Nasty Judge Lewis A. Kaplan
p
The dog ate my emails.....................
So she’s deleted evidence. How do we know she only deleted “death threats”? How do we know she didn’t delete emails with her friends, lawyers, Democrat political operatives, etc, planning a scheme to “get Trump” with a false story?
Deleting emails worked for ILLary...and it will work for this dame.This is,after all,the State of New York.
Deleting any Emails would upset her lawyers a lot more...
She should be given 72 hours to cough up the emails else the judge should throw out the conviction and everything, end this farce and dismiss it with prejudice.
Amazingly easy to “delete” something that never existed.
It is difficult to live with the fact we have to tolerate villains on earth and wait for them to get their punishment in the next world.
The original person who went to E. Jean was George Conway. Mizz uh...Carrol said he was the person who convinced her to sue Trump in the original lawsuit.
Such scum and villainy
The fix is in.
Let someone not on the left do that and watch how well that would be tolerated.
I thought deleted emails could be retrieved.
Doesn’t the efbeeeye have a way of doing this?
Trump DESTROYS E. Jean Carroll’s CREDIBILITY with Prior Statements on DAY 1 of Trial
https://youtu.be/VT9DNY1XxuA?si=jB2ypOfdYpJ5CKHL
Nasty Judge Lewis A. Kaplan
Bkmk
A Democrat Megadonor is bankrolling this travesty. Judge Kaplan has much to answer for. Disgusting.
The jury will consider that she had destroyed subpoenaed evidence.
“When a party alters, loses or destroys key evidence before it can be examined by the other party’s expert, the court should dismiss the pleadings of the party responsible for the spoliation” Squitieri v. City of New York, 248 A.D.2d 201, 202 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
What is spoliation of evidence?
Spoliation of evidence is the intentional or negligent alteration, hiding, withholding or destruction of pieces of evidence relevant to a trial by a party connected to the case. Manipulation or destruction can occur before or after filing or data preservation notices or at any other point. Any relevant parties – including targets, custodians, attorneys, analysts and/or investigators – can cause spoliation. It is not uncommon for custodians to engage in improper data collection efforts during self-collections that significantly impact the validity of evidence. Spoliation often afflicts metadata, a key piece of information embedded within data files that helps determine specific timestamps, ownership, file access history and more. Many times, when spoliation occurs, original data is permanently and negatively impacted; this can have significant impacts on an investigation and, ultimately, the entirety of a case.
Knowing what to do when crucial evidence is destroyed
Federal statutes criminalize the purposeful alteration or destruction of evidence to influence a trial. Preservation notices are crucial to alerting all parties of their obligation to properly maintain and protect applicable data. Failing to properly protect or preserve data can result in penalties such as imprisonment or the payment of legal fees to the injured/opposing party. It is critical that thought be given to where data may be stored and any secondary or tertiary locations where data may be duplicated, shared or referenced. Often, time is of the essence because of varying retention periods, security controls, backup schedules and automated deletions. Any action, even data hiding , can be considered spoliation and puts parties at risk of penalties from the court.
ping