[where's_the_Outrage?]

Any lawsuit bitch-slapping these 3 letter agencies for overreach sounds good to me.

[Jonty30]

They wouldn’t have to have that concern, if they were led by science.

[glennaro]

A lawsuit isn’t going to “undermine” the credibility of these “professional medical ‘experts’” ... they did that all by themselves.

[E. Pluribus Unum]

A lawsuit attempting to punish the FDA for ILLEGALLY denouncing ivermectin as a COVID cure could have dangerous consequences

Fixed it.

[Pollard]

Experts Fear

As it should be

[Openurmind]

As it SHOULD!

[Jan_Sobieski]

An Ivermectin Lawsuit Could Undermine Socialized US Public Health, Experts Fear

Fixed it!

[Carriage Hill]

Sue the FDA, CDC and NIH out of existence!

[AndyTheBear]

A lawsuit attempting to punish the FDA for denouncing ivermectin as a COVID cure could have dangerous consequences

Mistrust is high precisely because of this kind of cover up the truth attitude.

[ConservativeMind]

The FDA needs to be neutered.

[Navy Patriot]

Screw the FDA, MSN and the Messenger, the harder the better, put all the Liars out of business.

[joesbucks]

Hmmm. It says ivermectin began to appear as a cure in 2021. But it was 2020.

[READINABLUESTATE]

...could Undermine US pharmaceutical profits is more like it.

[Blood of Tyrants]

they don’t care. None of them will be personally or professionally held liable.

[econjack]

Ivermectin is an FDA-approved drug, meaning doctors are allowed to prescribe it as they see fit. While it is meant to treat parasitic diseases, many doctors — some hoping to cash it on the ivermectin craze — began to prescribe it off-label for COVID.

I would like to see proof of this assertion. There were plenty of controlled studies at the time, mainly in India and Australia, to show that ivermectin was an effective treatment and is why some doctors prescribed it. I have seen no evidence to suggest this was a profit-making move.

If the case against the FDA ultimately prevails, the agency’s ability to protect the public and support evidence-based medicine could be eroded.”

And that is exactly what should happen. Dr. Fauci and others caused the death of thousands of patients who might have lived had they received the drug. Instead, the FDA crawled into bed with Big Pharma for their own vaccines.

As Milton Friedman once said, the FDA has killed more people than it's saved by preventing drugs from coming on the market in a timely fashion, a knee jerk reaction to their Thalidomide debacle.

[nagant]

I’m becoming convinced that my onset of gout came from my clot shots. Anyone else experience this?

[Ancesthntr]

“ Some experts fear that punishment the FDA could face for refuting false information about the drug could undermine public health messaging in America.”
——————
First, trusting experts to be objective and to follow *ACTUAL* science is what caused so many to die from THE CHINA VIRUS or completely misguided treatments for it, or from the so-called v”vaccine” that has turned much of the U.S. population into either guinea pigs or streams of cash flow to those regulators and their Big Pharma co-conspirators.

Second, if ANYONE is responsible for “undermining health messaging in America “ it is the aforementioned regulators at the FDA and their choir in Big Pharma.

Let the chips fall where they may, as such will expose the corruption and the totalitarian tendencies of much of our government. F’em!

[metmom]

Like the FDA and CDC have done anything good for public health?

[Jane Long]

…. New England Journal of Medicine that “If the case against the FDA ultimately prevails, the agency’s ability to protect the public and support evidence-based medicine could be eroded.” …..

---

Hilarious, that they even attempt to claim this is what FDA has even tried to do.

Just the opposite, of course.

Shut. It. Down.

[antidemoncrat]

“A lawsuit attempting to punish the FDA for denouncing ivermectin as a COVID cure could have dangerous consequences”

Yeah, for the FDA ... like maybe defunding them

[fuzzylogic]

In other words, “those in government that engaged in overreach don’t want to be held accountable for their actions”. Got it.

They assumed authority that they don’t have and threatened doctors with having their license revoked as punishment for going against their narrative. So much for the “not being in between you and your doctor” - used by the left every time there’s a discussion on abortion.