Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Breaking: US Supreme Court Responds to Jack Smith’s Request For Ruling on Trump’s Immunity Argument (yes)
GATEWAYPUNDIT ^ | 12/11/2023 | cristina laila

Posted on 12/11/2023 8:15:32 PM PST by bitt

US Supreme Court justices on Monday afternoon responded to Special Counsel Jack Smith’s request to quickly rule on Trump’s immunity claims.

Jack Smith on Monday asked the US Supreme Court to weigh in on Trump’s immunity claims.

In September Trump was hit with 4 counts in Jack Smith’s January 6 case up in DC: Conspiracy to defraud the United States, conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding, obstruction of and attempt to obstruct an official proceeding, and conspiracy against rights.

Jack Smith is fighting to keep the March 4 trial date (one day before Super Tuesday) in his January 6 case against Trump in DC.

Trump’s lawyers argued that Trump is immune from federal prosecution for alleged ‘crimes’ committed while he served as US President.

Jack Smith skipped over the appellate court and went straight to the US Supreme Court on Trump’s immunity claims.

“This case presents a fundamental question at the heart of our democracy: whether a former President is absolutely immune from federal prosecution for crimes committed while in office,” Smith wrote in the Monday filing.

“The only reason for this petition is to seek to guarantee a trial of Trump (and possible conviction) before the election,” Constitutional expert Jonathan Turley said.

In a brief order, the Supreme Court signaled it would grant Jack Smith’s request for an expedited consideration.

“The court’s brief order did not signal what it ultimately would do.” – the AP reported.

The high court ordered Trump’s lawyers to respond by December 20.

According to the AP, the Supreme Court is scheduled to meet next on January 5, 2024.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; Extended News; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 00001furoberts; bloggers; deceptiveyes; jacksmith; noanswer; supremecourt; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last

1 posted on 12/11/2023 8:15:32 PM PST by bitt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: null and void; aragorn; EnigmaticAnomaly; kalee; Kale; AZ .44 MAG; Baynative; bgill; bitt; ...

p


2 posted on 12/11/2023 8:15:46 PM PST by bitt (<img src=' 'width=30%>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt
Well,there's,that!

One can only guess what is next.

3 posted on 12/11/2023 8:19:50 PM PST by djstex (All I Have to Say... President Trump was right about everything!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt

Looks like the premies are going to get involved in the 2024 Presidential election. Another steal by the communist far left.


4 posted on 12/11/2023 8:22:06 PM PST by FlingWingFlyer (The damage Biden and his freak show is doing to America is not reversable.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt

Let’s hope wisdom, common sense, and the US Constitution prevails.

Smith must think he has a solid case but this sounds like a Hail Mary to me.


5 posted on 12/11/2023 8:23:06 PM PST by Boomer (The Long Winter is coming...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt

WTF. The SC won’t lift a finger to intervene on massive election fraud because of _court precedent_ but they’ll bypass precedent and appellate court judgements to facilitate election fraud.


6 posted on 12/11/2023 8:23:33 PM PST by Skywise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt

A lot of people are claiming that a decision will hurt Trump. Maybe so, but if the Justices have been following these cases, maybe they were waiting for an opportunity to stop all this nonsense as soon as possible.

If so, Jack handed them the perfect opportunity to so. No one can complain if SCOTUS rules in favor of Trump because Smith asked for a ruling.


7 posted on 12/11/2023 8:24:27 PM PST by WASCWatch ( WASC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt

Ah - from zero hedge…

“This is *not* the Court agreeing to take up the case now. It is just the Court agreeing to move *very* quickly in deciding *whether* to take up the case at this juncture...”


8 posted on 12/11/2023 8:26:00 PM PST by Skywise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt
I don't think that the Supreme Court has agreed to hear an expidited appeal that circumvents the lower courts .

They have given Trump til the 20th to reply to Jack Smiths motion.

If they grant Smiths motion, then there will be an appropriate tie for Trump's legal team to draft a proper response.

9 posted on 12/11/2023 8:27:47 PM PST by rdcbn1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Skywise

My intuition is that the Supreme Court will listen to the arguments but decide that the appeals court should listen to the case first.


10 posted on 12/11/2023 8:30:25 PM PST by convoter2016
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: bitt

It just occurred to me that the rats might be setting up a legal case to protect the biden, clinton, and obama crime families, especially once Obiden has been kick to the curb.


11 posted on 12/11/2023 8:30:32 PM PST by Boomer (The Long Winter is coming...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Boomer

ABSOLUTELY AGREE!!!


12 posted on 12/11/2023 8:32:39 PM PST by Maris Crane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Skywise
It sounds like SCOTUS will hear arguments on why they should or should not expedite this case. They can still kick the can back down the road to the Appellate level. It does not mean they will hear the case until it has gone through the appeal process.

This signals Smith's case in Florida is not going to be heard before the election. He needs the DC case to get a conviction before the election. He does not care if it is tossed on appeal he wants to damage Trump. He knows the Marxist Judge has already convicted Trump.

13 posted on 12/11/2023 8:32:59 PM PST by OldGoatCPO (No Caitiff Choir of Angels will sing for me. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Boomer

The problem there is that Trump’s impeachment and ACQUITTAL for the same alleged “crimes” related to January 6th helps make his case under constitutional law. The rest of those losers can’t make that same argument.


14 posted on 12/11/2023 8:35:33 PM PST by Alberta's Child (If something in government doesn’t make sense, you can be sure it makes dollars.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Skywise

Read this article from tonight by Sundance at Conservative Treehouse. You’ll understand what’s going on here.

SUPREME Court: Trump must respond to special counsel’s presidential immunity petition BEFORE Christmas!

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2023/12/11/special-counsel-jack-smith-asks-supreme-court-to-decide-trump-immunity-highest-court-immediately-drops-all-business-to-comply-with-special-counsel-request/

Special Counsel Jack Smith Asks Supreme Court to Decide Trump Immunity – Highest Court Immediately Drops All Business to Comply With Special Counsel Request

After years of assembling datapoints around the potential for the Supreme Court to be compromised, it was the discovery of Mary McCord’s husband Sheldon Snook deep in the office of Chief Justice John Roberts that finally sealed the deal for me personally. Yes, the Supreme Court is compromised.

Quick Context. Mary McCord was the architect of all Trump targeting efforts. The FISA on Carter Page, the weaponization of the DOJ-NSD, the installation of Michael Atkinson as Intelligence Community Inspector General (ICIG), the companion to Sally Yates in the Flynn targeting, lead staff for the Schiff/Nadler impeachment effort, later appointment by FISA Presiding Judge Boasberg to be amicus to the FISC, in combination with Chief Justice John Roberts holding authority over the FISC, and the discovery that Sheldon Snook, McCord’s husband works in Robert’s office as “special assistant to Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr.’s counselor. The counselor’s office advises the chief justice not only on the management and budget of the Supreme Court but also on his interactions with the executive and legislative branches, along with numerous other public roles in which Roberts serves.” (link)

Mary McCord is the fulcrum point for all of the above issues. She connects all of the targeting operations. Mary McCord is the center of it, and John Robert’s office is compromised by the appointment of her husband Sheldon Snook. So, this story below does not surprise me.

Special Prosecutor Jack Smith jumped over the appeals court and asked the Supreme Court to decide on President Trump’s position of presidential immunity for his requests to secure the integrity of the 2020 election while in office. In the fastest turn around time in history, the Supreme Court [Robert’s office] said yes, they will hear the arguments.

Read more in the link plus the comments.


15 posted on 12/11/2023 8:35:41 PM PST by Macho MAGA Man (The last two weren't balloons. One was a cylindrical objects Trump is being given the Alex Jones tr)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Boomer

Protect them from who?


16 posted on 12/11/2023 8:38:09 PM PST by Macho MAGA Man (The last two weren't balloons. One was a cylindrical objects Trump is being given the Alex Jones tr)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: OldGoatCPO
This signals Smith's case in Florida is not going to be heard before the election.

Before Which election?

17 posted on 12/11/2023 8:38:50 PM PST by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas (Re-imagine the media!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: bitt
Jerkoff Smith waits almost 3 YEARS to prosecute Trump over Jan. 6th..

Now SUDDENLY, Jerkoff is in a BIG HURRY to put Trump in prison.

FUJS!

David Weiss waits MORE THAN 3 YEARS to indict Hunter over his many crimes..

Now SUDDENLY, mere days after the House subpoenas Hunter to testify behind closed doors, Weiss is SUDDENLY in a BIG HURRY to indict Hunter.

FUDW

100% LAWFARE AGAINST TRUMP

100% PROTECTING HUNTER!

18 posted on 12/11/2023 8:40:19 PM PST by CivilWarBrewing (Get off my back for my usage of CAPS, especially you snowflake males! MAN UP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Boomer

Interesting point. What can the President do that would cause him to be convicted of a crime…

In general, a President should have vast immunity - otherwise each successive Presidency can jail the predecessor.

Trumps case is even more unique, because he is also the leading Presidential candidate.


19 posted on 12/11/2023 8:40:43 PM PST by Pikachu_Dad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: bitt

Here’s where we get the final numbers on the makeup of the SCOTUS...
My guess:
Communists: 3
Americans: 3
Weak-kneed yellow-bellied: 3


20 posted on 12/11/2023 8:43:33 PM PST by SuperLuminal (Where is the next Sam Adams when we so desperately need him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson