p
One can only guess what is next.
Looks like the premies are going to get involved in the 2024 Presidential election. Another steal by the communist far left.
Let’s hope wisdom, common sense, and the US Constitution prevails.
Smith must think he has a solid case but this sounds like a Hail Mary to me.
WTF. The SC won’t lift a finger to intervene on massive election fraud because of _court precedent_ but they’ll bypass precedent and appellate court judgements to facilitate election fraud.
A lot of people are claiming that a decision will hurt Trump. Maybe so, but if the Justices have been following these cases, maybe they were waiting for an opportunity to stop all this nonsense as soon as possible.
If so, Jack handed them the perfect opportunity to so. No one can complain if SCOTUS rules in favor of Trump because Smith asked for a ruling.
Ah - from zero hedge…
“This is *not* the Court agreeing to take up the case now. It is just the Court agreeing to move *very* quickly in deciding *whether* to take up the case at this juncture...”
They have given Trump til the 20th to reply to Jack Smiths motion.
If they grant Smiths motion, then there will be an appropriate tie for Trump's legal team to draft a proper response.
It just occurred to me that the rats might be setting up a legal case to protect the biden, clinton, and obama crime families, especially once Obiden has been kick to the curb.
Now SUDDENLY, Jerkoff is in a BIG HURRY to put Trump in prison.
FUJS!
David Weiss waits MORE THAN 3 YEARS to indict Hunter over his many crimes..
Now SUDDENLY, mere days after the House subpoenas Hunter to testify behind closed doors, Weiss is SUDDENLY in a BIG HURRY to indict Hunter.
FUDW
100% LAWFARE AGAINST TRUMP
100% PROTECTING HUNTER!
Here’s where we get the final numbers on the makeup of the SCOTUS...
My guess:
Communists: 3
Americans: 3
Weak-kneed yellow-bellied: 3
Kavenaugh will vote as ordered. The feds, DOJ, and US Marshall’s all let him know they are not going to stop assassins. Only two will vote to protect the constitution in this case.
According to the AP, the Supreme Court is scheduled to meet next on January 5, 2024?
What an obfuscator that Smith is!
Is there a difference between immune and absolutely immune? --No, not in reality, but only as emotionally-driven, partisan propaganda.
Smith wants his question answered for the presumed "crimes committed" when there has yet to be a crime clearly pointed to in the law that and secondly, an enumeration of evidence that would show that PDJT has met all dispassionate, necessary elements to show he transgressed such law(s). Thus, SCOTUS' answer to Smith's question would not necessarily apply to his J6 indictment of PJDT as Smith has yet to prove before the court that PDJT has committed any crime.
As the embodiment of the Executive Branch in early January of 2021, PDJT was privy to many classified facts, observations and activities to which neither Smith nor any other person in the world was "read in." I don't think the Constitutional Framers intended that unelected prosecutors such as Smith should rightfully be allowed to play Monday morning quarterback for a US president's actions when, for example, PDJT has fresh intel from his DNI that there was foreign interference in the 2020 election. Other than dropping flashbangs on innocent, docile protesters, it's impossible for me to imagine that PDJT was committing crimes through peaceable rhetoric and a request that protesters disperse and go home.
Smith, the J6 Committee, the media and Dems have imputed that PDJT committed crimes without showing evidence that clearly demonstrates such. Almost all the evidence they claim to have had the J6 committee (Cheney?) illegally choose to destroy. The coordination of so many on the left, particularly as wielded by Pelosi over the Capitol Police and keeping the National Guard at bay for most of the day, is RICO-style coordination that was is of the same type as their evidenced and realized overthrow of the US Government in the November 3rd election. The Left's activities on J6, as clearly shown by the fact that there were so many deceptively dressed while on the FBI or three-letter agency payrolls, has come into ever-sharper focus as the true crime of an election coup.
While PDJT has been charged for J6 riots, there are many on the Left who should be charged, convicted and sentenced for what was seen on Capitol Hill that day.
Could it be that Jack is losing so he wants an excuse to end the game but still have the narrative that Trump is guilty but couldn’t be prosecuted. The media and crowd can keep this story going through the elections.
My fear is that the Deep State will use any immunity decision to further destroy America while lapping up all of the graft for themselves. The larger and much more important issue is whether or not an “insurrection” occurred. However, as we have seen in the past few weeks, the Cabal has destroyed evidence that could have been used in the defense of President Trump and every single one of the political prisoners. THAT is maddening.
Smkith has three radical Justices in his corner Sotomayor, Kagan and the radical Katanji Brown Jackson. This has been prearranged.
The problem is that this motion may NOT have to be heard by the full banc of Justices, like a regular appeal becuase it is an interlocutory matter.
The TRump team has to make sure that the entire banc hears this motion, not just the three skanks including the leaker of the Roe v Wade distinction case.
Generally such an unusual interlocutory motion would be refused by the court.But there are three radicals who might sign on to it.I think it only takes 2 and if there are only three justices hearing it...could be bad.
the president is the executive branch and one can say in charge of the federal laws execution... impeachment is the consequence for breaking federal laws as president.
the moron meathead thinks the SCOTUS ruled against trump.
The fix is in. They want Trump tried and convicted before the election