Posted on 08/25/2023 6:04:01 PM PDT by justme4now
As Donald Trump was being booked and processed for a fourth time on a fourth indictment, this time in Georgia, old social media posts of DA Fani Willis emerged.
What they contained provided a view into the rabid partisan nature and hypocrisy of the prosecutor now trying to put the former president behind bars.
(Excerpt) Read more at redstate.com ...
It’s different when they do it.
Why hasn’t the Supreme Court gotten involved? They are in charge of the Judicial Branch and will lose it if they don’t do something. Are they just chickens hits, or is there some real reason?
Great!
As the man said: It ain’t over ‘til it’s over - the fat lady hasn’t sung yet.
Everyone likes to say that the SCOTUS can only hear what is brought before them.
I ask why do they have to set back and watch the country being torn apart with all of the injustice?🤬
This s#!+ is 3rd world tactics!🤨
“Going back to her 2020 posts, Willis agreed with false racist claims that only “white people” were voting, suggesting that they make up “116 percent” of the voting pool. “
Looks like fat-bottom Fani needs to go back to, ummm, fourth grade?
.
later
I don’t think SCOTUS can get involved until A LOWER COURT has rendered a verdict. As of today, Trump is presumed innocent until convicted in a court of law. No such trial has taken place, and no verdict has been rendered.
Indictment is not conviction.
Even though a large percentage of oblivious cell phone and social media addicted Americans are blind to it, we are in the middle of a battle with implications just as important as the October revolution in 1917. Question this at the peril of all of us. It’s that important.
What can anyone do about malicious prosecution then?😠
SCOTUS can take action on one aspect of this case. Meadows ( not sure if Trump has done the same yet) has made a motion to move the case to a federal court on the basis of a federal law that requires the removal of criminal proceedings brought in state court to the federal court system when someone is charged for actions they allegedly took as a federal official acting under color of law. If denied, I think they can petition Thomas, he is in charge of the 11th circuit which includes GA, to intervene.
..... Well then ..... By her own words ... She must be prossecuted ......
.
I think its cause it has to goto the appellate court first. It is funny between her tweets and Stacy Abrams literally suing the state of Georgia claiming machines where changing votes I don’t think this case even gets to trial and is just dismissed at the appellate level.
Typical Democratic Hypocrite!
“I don’t think SCOTUS can get involved until A LOWER COURT has rendered a verdict.”
Each circuit has a presiding SCOTUS Justice.
Once verdicts of any import are made against motions, the justice can quickly become involved if necessary, if the case is on their radar, which I imagine this case is.
The United States Constitution is the impediment here. For starters, procedural and substantive due process embodied in the 5th and 14th Amendments.
In the last day or so, I heard that she had opened up a
fundraising site. I bring it up because someone else may
have heard about that too.
That would have to be seen as a conflict of interest.
I guess a malicious prosecution can find a biased jury and indict anyone.
Democrats do it all the time. They have no sense of decency.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.