Posted on 07/12/2023 12:46:01 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
The day after the federal court in Missouri v. Biden granted our request for a preliminary injunction against the government’s censorship regime, law professors Leah Litman and Laurence Tribe published an article in Slate slamming the court’s ruling. Framing the case in entirely partisan terms, Litman and Tribe’s analysis betrayed an inadequate understanding of the First Amendment free speech guarantees and established limits on government power.
The next day, the Biden administration requested a stay against the injunction (which was denied by the district court judge) and appealed the decision to the Fifth Circuit.
As one of the plaintiffs in this case, I can clearly see errors of fact and legal reasoning in their diatribe against the decision. In the opening paragraph, the authors baldly assert, “The impetus behind the case is the now thoroughly debunked conspiracy theory that the government is somehow strong-arming Big Tech into censoring conservative speech and speakers in violation of the First Amendment.” The incantation “thoroughly debunked conspiracy theory” is meant here to function as a hypnotic device, absolving readers from actually examining the reams of evidence we present in the case.
In another unintelligible rhetorical flourish, they assert in the closing paragraph that the court’s ruling is “trying to make the infamous ‘Twitter Files’ into constitutional law.” Anyone who has read the “Twitter Files” reports will have trouble understanding what that sentence even means. The court did not rely on the “Twitter Files” but rather on information in the case unearthed in preliminary discovery. Between these beguiling bookends, Litman and Tribe ignore the evidence and sidestep the relevant legal questions.
(Excerpt) Read more at thefederalist.com ...
They know this is ludicrous but meant for public consumption to inure the masses to their totally ignoring the ruling and law.
ENJOY THE SHOW:DIRECTOR’S CUT:
HOW WE’VE BEEN LIED TO. (2 HOURS)
Suggest you watch it NOW just in case it suddenly vanishes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FSX7ESKLdTM
-PJ
Lawrence Tribe? Too bad that old hack isn’t a federal judge.
Ooohhh that's good...
Applies to the election fraud too.
Dunno anything about Litman, but Larry Tribe is a nut. The truth is usually the opposite of what be says on just about any issue.
Bkmk
Bttt
My Guess: Litman and Tribemare two Bolshevik Jews like Schumer, Schiff and NAdler.
Its amazing how a whole class of Bolsheviks have arisen in America who want t o destroy America just like their immediate forefathers helped Stalin to destroy Russia.
I do not regard these Bolsheviks as Jews, for they have substituted God with KArl Marx. THey also plague Benjamin Nethanyahu in Israel.
We need to de-elect and ridicule the lot of them.
Send that to Kamala!
With a record like that you’d think he would be a “journalist”.
Communists lie; they never tell the truth.
Looks interesting so far. Thanks for posting.
Litman and Tribe, why doesn’t it surprise me that these two would be in favor of the warped power grab of the Biden regime? The smell of power and money attracts people like this like the smell of carrion attracts vultures.
HT GSC.. .LAWRENCE TRIBE IS A GRADE A POS.
https://www.thecrimson.com/article/1990/6/7/allegations-of-racism-ignite-citywide-debate/
He was amongst a cluster of NIMBY liberals who successfully destroyed a minority-focused daycare center in Cambridge.
Small wonder that he’s a jack wagon in this situation, too. Tribe can gargle with razor blades.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.