There is currently no text in this page. You can search for this page title in other pages, or search the related logs, but you do not have permission to create this page.
Posted on 05/11/2023 10:53:02 AM PDT by Red Badger
Governments must introduce measures to reduce the public’s standard of living by a staggering 75 percent, using force if necessary, globalist corporate media outlets are now warning.
The public must take drastic measures to reduce individuals’ so-called “carbon footprint” to stop “global warming,” according to the BBC.
In its “Future World” series, the BBC warns viewers that choosing to live an “ultra-low carbon lifestyle” is no longer an option and calls for the standards to be mandated by governments.
The public-funded British media outlet insists that a dramatic reduction in living standards is now required if the planet is to be saved from allegedly man-made “climate change.”
According to the BBC, however, “climate change” is too important for “carbon footprint” reduction to be left to personal choice, and is calling on governments around the world to step in.
Right now, the “carbon footprint” of someone living in the developed world ranges anywhere from 4.46 metric tons per year in France, all the way up to 15.43 metric tons per year in Canada.
In the United States, the average person’s carbon footprint clocks in at 14.67 metric tons per year, according to Bomb Thrower.
Americans’ carbon footprint is nearly eight times higher than the two metric tons per year limit that’s required to meet the green agenda goals dictated by the World Economic Forum (WEF).
According to the BBC, two metric tons per year of carbon “waste” is about half the output of a single gas-powered car in the U.S. – and nothing more.
In order for an individual to lower their carbon “waste” below the WEF-friend limit, every individual would have to give up personal car use, energy usage, meat-eating, and other “wasteful” necessities.
The average person’s lifestyle would have to change dramatically in order to comply with an “ultra-low carbon green lifestyle.”
For most people, this “lifestyle” would mean abject poverty and misery and a prison-like life where there is very little travel allowed, and minimal, if any, freedoms.
While this may already sound extreme, others in the green cult believe that even a limit of two metric tons of carbon footprint per person per year is still too much.
Some alarmists are suggesting just 1.4 metric tons instead by the year 2040 with further reduction to just 0.7 metric tons per year per person by the year 2050.
For some reason, the BBC ignored Communist China in its reporting on the worst carbon-emitting countries.
China generates the most pollution and carbon “waste” of any other country, by far.
The United States is the second largest CO2 emitting nation, while Canada doesn’t even make the top ten.
However, China emits more pollution than the rest of the top five countries COMBINED.
Nevertheless, Communist China almost always gets a free pass in the media when it comes to things like energy usage, pollution, and other green-related issues.
The WEF and its members never call China out while rolling out plans to “save the planet” such as bug-eating or bans on public car ownership.
“We live in a world where many people believe many different things, but nowhere else do we find the kind of mandatory buy-in required as with the so-called climate crisis,” reports Mark E. Jeftovic.
“Fortunately we’re hearing from an increasing number of scientists that there is no crisis, and whose voices are getting louder even in the face of corporate media ‘fact checking’ and other headwinds of narrative control.”
Scripture tells us there will be a new heaven and a new earth to replace this one.
As to your first comment, we are still reduced to mind reading to fathom where you are coming from.
True, but they know those things won’t help anyone unless they are courageous enough to use them.
So far, they aren’t all that worried.
It is just a little more than an annoyance to them
Speaking of what The Book says.
Another evangelical willing to reject the book of James, while not understanding the need for works. Faith without works is dead. No one is promoting works as a means to salvation, but if you don’t understand the relationship, you don’t understand the gospel of Jesus Christ.
If the Children of Israel couldn’t get it done with all of the miracles they experienced while Moses led them, what makes you think this is so easy? I suggest it wise to contemplate their experience.
“Well, my family is certainly going there thanks to Burden and his economic team. Not willfully, I might add.”
Everyone I know is doing fine. Why is your situation bad?
“And by “public” they do not mean the rich and famous Lear jet leftists who expect to form the core of the global Inner Party.”
This also wouldn’t include Trump and his family.
Let’s give up most of the federal foobermunt instead of trashing our standard of living.
“Let’s give up most of the federal foobermunt instead of trashing our standard of living.”
I’m prepared for the Great Reset so my standard won’t change much.
WRONG!!! I know what the Book of James says. It says works are necessary AFTER you believe by Faith. As I said friend, Ephesians 2: vv. 8 and 9 CLEARLY cover it. Nothing else is there. You believe by faith, and after you believe you work for His kingdom. You believe He is whom He said He is and that He came to die on that wooden Cross for every sin ever committed on this earth. You believe what you believe that you have to work for your salvation first? That is WRONG. Not works then faith. Verse 9 says works comes last, after faith.
You and the mouse?
But our citizenship is in heaven, and from it we await a Savior, the Lord Jesus Christ,
Thanks for the hint. I’ll take a look, maybe it will help.
just select the blank area.
I have reached out, thru the Internet, and determined you have a WHITE background.
Speaking of backgrounds, you are obviously on a different wave length and so the hint was no help and your last two even less. Care to discuss reality? Christian confusion and numberless denominations beginning with the reformation? I didn’t think so.
Spare me the duplication of the numberless “offshoots of mormonism”. Their numbers are inconsequential and dead end is an adequate description for the majority.
Time’s getting short brother. The wheat and tares are still growing together, but there will be a harvest not a rapture.
To: Elsie Hint: Philippians 3:20 ESV
|
I wouldn't want to try to explain the boasting of the fella that held the church together with the fact of numerous offshoots either.
Leave that kind of logic for the folks at FAIR.
There is currently no text in this page. You can search for this page title in other pages, or search the related logs, but you do not have permission to create this page.
Modern revelation makes it clear that the saints will remain on the earth through the tribulation period until Christ's coming and those who are old or in the grave shall be changed to a resurrected state at that time. Younger saints will grow old and be changed in an instant at one hundred years of age (Isaiah 65:20; DC 101:30-31) to inherit a glorious resurrection with God and Christ.
Question: Do Mormons believe in the "rapture"? - FAIR (fairlatterdaysaints.org)
Modern revelation makes it clear that the saints will remain on the earth through the tribulation period until Christ’s coming and those who are old or in the grave shall be changed to a resurrected state at that time. Younger saints will grow old and be changed in an instant at one hundred years of age (Isaiah 65:20; DC 101:30-31) to inherit a glorious resurrection with God and Christ.
Not sure where that quote came from, although it isn’t in quotation marks. If you were to refer to the tenth Article of Faith you might find a more relative quote. Ultimately the Earth will be a celestial orb, but before that can happen where no unclean thing can dwell much less tolerate it must return to it’s original state when Adam and Eve were living in the Garden a state that man also needs to pass through in preparation for the celestial.
The three states are telestial, the one we now experience, Terrestrial, the one that existed for Adam and Eve before being removed from the Garden, and the final state Celestial. In the tenth Article of Faith it is referred to as paradisiacal glory. Your quote indicates happenings out of sequence. Man will still be subject to death both physical and spiritual during Christ’s thousand year reign on earth and I don’t believe the instant resurrection at his coming except for those already dead worthy of resurrection, and worthy of coming in the clouds with Him.
His coming is the beginning of the thousand years, life goes on.
If you would have clicked on the link at the bottom of #198; it would have been staring you in the face.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.