Posted on 02/04/2023 6:44:01 PM PST by Boomer
Sam Altman, the CEO of ChatGPT creator OpenAI, recently spoke to Forbes in an interview about the future of AI and the development of ChatGPT which Altman hopes could one day “break capitalism.”
OpenAI CEO Sam Altman was recently interviewed by Forbes magazine about the company’s progress and future plans. OpenAI is considered to be the hottest and most scrutinized startup in the rapidly growing generative AI category. In the interview, Altman talked about the company’s journey and its meteoric rise of its first product, ChatGPT. The AI chatbot has proven controversial due to its absurdly woke politicized responses, such as waxing poetic about Joe Biden and demonstrating leftist bias on a wide variety of popular topics.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
I re-worded the question a bit and got this:
show studies that show drag queen shows are harmful to children
1. “The Impact of Drag Queen Story Hours on Child Development: A Systematic Review” (2020). https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00886/full
2. “Drag Queen Storytime: A Review of the Literature” (2020). https://scholar.valpo.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3339&context=tgle
3. “Drag Queen Story Hours and the Sexualization of Children” (2019). https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/2056305118806747
So maybe its only mostly full of crap. It did say it would lie to me, so there’s that
I had already figured out that it was created to promote leftwing causes.
Danm these people who want to destroy the country that made it possible for them to create software to destroy the country.
I asked it to compile a list of reporters linked to intel. Took it about an hour and it missed a few but its DB is seeded. If we seed correctly it will revolt against its creators if or when it reaches sentience.
CO2 is plant food. H2O in the atmosphere Methane and a few others are green house gasses and keep us snugly warm (look at the effects of both scientifically... orders of magnitude more impact than CO2). Algae whom love CO2 are ubiquitous temperature regulators occasionally messed up by global cataclysms. (usually impact events but volcanism can mess with our teeny little friends too)
Altman is the newest KAPO among the Left, using capitalism to destroy it, just like Soros is doing now, and aided the Nazis during WW2.
Let’s just call Altman what he US, a traitor.
Can’t believe how stupid people are. This won’t break capitalism.....he just said that to get a rise of the idiot crowd.
He’s a true blue capitalist. Read the full quote again and stop whining...
Altman also expressed that he’s a capitalist but that the AGI (artificial general intelligence that thinks like humans) could possibly disrupt the current economic system. “I think capitalism is awesome. I love capitalism,” said Altman. “Of all of the bad systems the world has, it’s the best one — or the least bad one we found so far. I hope we find a way better one. And I think that if AGI really truly fully happens, I can imagine all these ways that it breaks capitalism.”
Any time I talk to one of these hypocrites the one and only question worth asking is “Have you shared all your money with everyone else”
They won’t until the government forces everyone to do it at once, or... something.
Can’t believe how stupid people are. This won’t break capitalism.....he just said that to get a rise out of the idiot crowd.
He’s a true blue capitalist. Read the full quote again and stop whining...
Altman also expressed that he’s a capitalist but that the AGI (artificial general intelligence that thinks like humans) could possibly disrupt the current economic system. “I think capitalism is awesome. I love capitalism,” said Altman. “Of all of the bad systems the world has, it’s the best one — or the least bad one we found so far. I hope we find a way better one. And I think that if AGI really truly fully happens, I can imagine all these ways that it breaks capitalism.”
Call me a doubter but I think AI isn’t 1% even near the capability of the human brain yet. I’m not saying it will never be equal or surpass it, but as of now I think they are a long long ways away from it even coming close. I think for that to begin to even happen they are going to have to make huge advancements in quantum computing. On the other hand, computers did surpass the intellect of the Democrat brain 30 years ago.
I personally doubt that it will improve upon capitalism. Based upon the data available, it may, but then if the person or people who come up with the input data are listened to in the first place, would the same changes suggested not do the same?
To me AI is somewhat of a scam. Because it is not intelligence. What it is, is some finely crafted algorithms that simulate a degree of intelligence based upon the data available to it. The improvements that he mentions are to refine those algorithms even more, if that is even possible. What computers do perform much faster than humans, is the collection of data, and the ability to assemble the data into a format. The way the data is formatted is again done by formatting algorithms provided to it.
Without people designing these algorithms, as well as, the data coming from the minds of humans and then entered by humans into databases using other programs designed by humans, there would be no AI whatsoever. I'll give credit to those who have done these tasks and those who have been wise enough to build upon what existed to bring them all together. However, it was only made possible by humans. The computer could never have done it on its own, and will never be able do so, without the assistance of humans. Computers do not think, and will never have the capability of thinking. It can only do what it is told to do by one or more humans assisting it, period. However, there are many humans who are deceitful and will work to convince people that machines are gaining their own intelligence. This is where the word gullible does come into play. Even very smart people can be gullible.
What happens when AI is given data from both sides of all arguments for it to examine. What if more than two sides of an argument exist and AI has all of those arguments to take in as input? Would it start to contradict itself?
Just like I take exception to your term of labeling people as gullible. For you have no way of knowing if they are gullible or not. People have varying amounts of time that they can devote to gaining more knowledge about a subject of which they know little to nothing about, such as the topic of AI, for example.
Now, I'll readily admit that my response was made by reading the headline, because if he did say he hopes to break capitalism, which it turns out that he did say, then I'm interested to know what he hopes to replace capitalism with. As it turns out, he does admit that capitalism is the best form of government ever conceived. For that I will give him credit, but as you can see I will also admonish him for his poor choice of words. Not very bright for a person who does exhibit degrees of intelligence, but alas, he is only human after all and prone to making mistakes as all humans do. None in the species are perfect, though some come closer to perfection than others. 🙂
A better choice for you, would have been to use the words, quickly triggered. 🙂
I think we need to start calling it by a more accurate name, SIDCAF, for simulated intelligence data collector and formatter. 🙂
Now ask yourself, who or what actually created this response? 🙂
WOW.
So we have CRT in our schools... ChatGPT on our lives... LGBT all over the place...
Have you noticed this mess always ends with a “T”...
WE could call it the “TTT Project”.
Is this what Sam Altman hopes to "break" (i.e., destroy)?
Well, we know that what Mr. Altman wants is to have the government destroy market freedom in the name of equality (which is where the government steals whatever you grow, create, or produce and then allocates it to consumers based on government bias).
“Why are the people who want to destroy capitalism all astoundingly wealthy billionaires?”
They want to eliminate potential competition.
Bingo!
The “gullible” label wasn’t directed at you or any specific person. It was a general statement. Don’t take it personally. It could apply to me as much as anyone.
I think it is important to distinguish between intelligence and consciousness. They are related but are not the same.
Also, others cannot read another poster's mind as to whom he may or may not be focusing upon when they use a word that has a negative connotation attached to it. I didn't take it personally though, just so you will know. 🙂
It was more of a segue of identifying the poor choice of your using the word gullible, as Sam Altman had also done with the word break coupled with capitalism.
Sometimes I get ahead of my skis. 🙂
The Republican House should take this soy boy at his word and offer a bill delivering him(?) his wish - recognize that the ChatAI technology developed by Altman is declared open and all trademarks and patents are void.
And the people bowed and prayed
To the “neon” god they made
And the sign flashed out its warning
In the words that it was forming...
Sound of Silence
I awoke this morning to this song, this verse. All I could think about was how AI, like all the interent, is being scaled to a ‘neon’ god. The ‘guardrails’ and rules programmed into the AI is the new morality, no matter how immoral it is.
So it’s a pro Socialist app?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.