Climate scientists baffled as to why Antarctica has not warmed in 70 years despite rising CO2 levels

lifesite news ^ | 1/31/2023 | Chris Morrison

[SaxxonWoods]

"Scientists are scrambling to explain why the continent of Antarctica has shown Net Zero warming for the last seven decades and almost certainly much longer. The lack of warming over a significant portion of the Earth undermines the unproven hypothesis that the carbon dioxide humans add to the atmosphere is the main determinant of global climate.

Under “settled” science requirements, the significant debate over the inconvenient Antarctica data is of necessity being conducted well away from prying eyes in the mainstream media..."

[SaxxonWoods]

How can people who ARE the Science be baffled? How far is it from "baffled" to "wrong"?

Maybe one is "baffled" while fighting to come to grips with being "wrong". Those fat grants are going bye-bye if they don't get this straightened out to Uncle Sugar's satisfaction.

[ClearCase_guy]

Conclusion first.

Evidence second.

And if the evidence doesn’t match the conclusion, tell people you are “baffled” until you can conjure up more suitable evidence. That’s science.

[WKUHilltopper]

Because your wishful thinking and your bullshit isn’t science?

[RetiredTexasVet]

Must be something in their fentanyl ... Died Suddenly, Doctors Baffled have the same condition.

[NWFree]

How much more government grant money do they need to figure out this baffling question? 😏

[teeman8r]

because it is a crock.

[SGCOS]

cuz heat rises to the north pole and the cold air sinks to antartica?

[E. Pluribus Unum]

The solubility of CO₂ in water is inversely proportional to temperature

Since CO₂ is soluble in water and the oceans cover a majority of the Earth's surface, the oceans sequester more CO₂ than any other CO₂ sink.

Because of the inverse solubility of CO₂ with temperature, the colder the oceans get, the more CO₂ they can absorb.

Conversely, when the oceans get warmer, they expel CO_2.

Atmospheric CO₂ therefore follows global temperatures, it does not cause them.

You can see the yearly global atmospheric CO₂ fluctuation as the oceans warm and cool with the seasons in the NOAA graph below.

The "settled science" that CO₂ causes "climate change" is therefore criminal sophistry.

[GingisK]

I don’t think there is a better way of saying it than your explanation.

[Graybeard58]

Penguins have solved the problem.

[G Larry]

"scientists" already know that CO2 levels TRAIL warming trends by decades!

CO2 levels ARE NOT A CAUSE OF GLOBAL WARMING!!!

[Hojczyk]

It is volcanoes that cause global warming or cooling…they have cycles also

[Reno89519]

Maybe because global warming is a scam and unsupported by the facts?

[airborne]

They spelled "$cienti$t$" wrong!

[Bulwyf]

Someone left the stove on at a research station.

The only solution is to colonize Antarctica. It’s the only way to be sure.

[dennisw]

Baffled is becoming a key word for searching vaxxxxx deaths and injuries.

Now it seems the twin fraudsters called climate change scientists... They are also baffled. Sherlock Holmes was only temporally baffled. Then he solved the crime, with Watson.

[Vermont Lt]

I guess that’s good. A melting North Pole won’t have a massive impact on sea levels. A melting South Pole would be huge. All that ice is sitting on land, not pressing down on a sea. Perhaps the frozen land under the ice keeps it cooler than floating on sea water.

[bk1000]

Man made climate change is a hoax. Follow the money.

[SaxxonWoods]

Why, it’s like a free climate control system built right into the Earth.

Maybe we should tell the “Science”.

[dennisw]

Baffled! Flummoxed!