Posted on 01/08/2023 9:09:04 AM PST by fireman15
COVID Boosters Trigger Metastasis
Patient after patient in stable remission are now suddenly experiencing an explosive relapse
Oncology doctors are sounding the alarm – the COVID boosters appear to be triggering metastasis. Patient after patient in stable remission are now suddenly experiencing an explosive relapse, triggering the appearance of new tumors just days or weeks after being forced to have a booster.
STORY AT-A-GLANCE Cancer rates have increased since the introduction of the COVID shots and is now one of the top three leading causes of premature death among younger adults — a trend that in turn is driving down U.S. life expectancy.
The leading causes of death in 2021 were heart disease and cancer, both of which are potential side effects of the COVID jabs.
Dr. Angus Dalgleish, professor of oncology at St. George’s University of London, warns that COVID boosters may be causing aggressive metastatic cancers.
Research shows SARS-CoV-2 spike protein obliterates 90% of the DNA repair mechanism in lymphocytes, a type of white blood cell that helps your body fight infection and chronic disease, including cancer.
The COVID jab is less effective in lymphoma patients. Emory University researchers found only 68% of non-Hodgkin lymphoma and chronic lymphocytic leukemia developed neutralizing antibodies after the second dose, compared to 100% of healthy controls.
Cancer rates have increased since the introduction of the COVID shots and is one of the top three leading causes of premature death among younger adults — a trend that in turn is driving down U.S. life expectancy.
(Excerpt) Read more at theepochtimes.com ...
My sisters and brother all took the jab. Not sure if they took the second or third. Said I was crazy for opposing the poison shots. So far they seem to be fine, so I suspect they just took the first jab. Also they trusted the local news affiliates because they were “local” and that was why they took the jabs. I pointed out the locals went to the same journalism schools as the national media and reported the stories that were fed to them.
I generally agree with your take. If there had never been any “vaccines” I think deaths might be about the same and immunity would be strong and almost universal by now.
(From the article) :”Oncology doctors are sounding the alarm – the COVID boosters appear to be triggering metastasis.
Patient after patient in stable remission are now suddenly experiencing an explosive relapse,
triggering the appearance of new tumors just days or weeks after being forced to have a booster.
(From Post #1) : The crux of the issue is nailed down in the last paragraph of post #1, especially in the very last sentence :
“ Disturbingly, as detailed in “How Cancer Deaths From the COVID Jabs Are Being Hidden,”
analysis of U.S. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR) data suggests the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has been filtering out and redesignating cancer deaths as COVID deaths
since April 2021 to eliminate the cancer signal.
The signal is being hidden by swapping the underlying cause of death with main cause of death. “(Emphasis Mine)
(Title) : "Safety signals for 770 different serious adverse events in VAERS were ignored by the CDC "
FReeper Source : https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/4121598/posts
Original News Source: https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/safety-signals-for-770-different
Are we seeing a pattern of behavior from the CDC ?
What's so "unbelievable" about it? They're paid shills, that's all.
Although I suppose a few are probably just vaxxed folks who fear that they may have effed themselves and are lashing out at anyone and anything that puts that fear in their hearts. I imagine that there's some of that going on as well.
At some point “anecdotal” becomes “data”.
Ignoring patterns of anecdotal reports is foolhardy.
IIRC, when Viagara was being tested for heart conditions, it didn’t work as expected so they were stopping the study. However, it was the anecdotal evidence that resulted in them finding a new use for it.
Who said they were wrong?
If they want population reduction, who easier to kill off than someone with a history of cancer? Of course they’d advise those with a history of cancer to get vaxed.
I did miss it. Thanks for the link.
Demonic evil is at the helm in our government. The same policies of their master, to kill, steal, and destroy.
They’re busy fibbing, er, fighting, er, $hilling, on other threads.
—> Ignoring patterns of anecdotal reports is foolhardy.
VIOXX passed the “golden standard” of testing and went on to kill ~ +140,000 patients when prescribed by doctors.
Anyone who ignores the patterns of observable data sets is a fool - simple as that.
People are much more likely to get flu and Covid in winter when people lack exposure to sun, and become more deficient in Vitamin D. So why isn’t CDC or some other agency urging people to take Vitamin D3 or get their blood tested, since recent studies have shown people who are hospitalized for any number of diseases are almost always insufficient or deficient in Vitmin D. A recent study I read of 9 different common cancers found all cancerous tissue was deficient in Zinc, even when surrounding healthy tissue had adequate or even plenty of Zinc.
Love your style ;-)
Is there a vitamin or mineral that would facilitate Zinc uptake into the cell ?
"You need more zinc.""But, Doc, your serum testing showed I had "even plenty of zinc". Your biopsy showed I had "even plenty of zinc".
"Don't you read FreeZincpublic?? YOU NEED MORE ZINC. I'm prescribing you 6 years in a zinc mine in Gamsburg. You speak fluent Ndebele, don't you? DON'T YOU? See, this is what happens when you let your ZINC LEVELS FLUX."
LOFLZZZINC,INC.
Or they are lying...
Yup.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.