Posted on 12/16/2022 5:16:38 AM PST by Red Badger
Tucker Carlson generally deals with topics that are pertinent to news today. When he dives into historical events, you know it’s because it’s a bombshell and tonight’s episode of Tucker Carlson Tonight delivered.
The assassination of President John F. Kennedy marked the launch of the modern conspiracy theory movement. Six decades later, we’re still getting new information and it doesn’t look good for the CIA. They were clearly involved in multiple ways, from the use of a “mind-control expert” to gaslight the world about Jack Ruby to the ongoing coverup that ties the CIA directly to the assassination. Even former CIA Director Mike Pompeo, who pressured Donald Trump to keep information hidden, declined an invitation to talk about it.
Trump had promised to release all the JFK files as scheduled for 2017. But Pompeo pressured him to hold back much of the release, assumably the most important parts that would implicate the CIA then and now. In doing so, he compelled President Trump to have one of his few broken promises of his first term.
That move alone should preclude any Republicans from even considering Pompeo for the GOP nomination for president in 2024.
According to the Gateway Pundit:
As reported earlier today – On Thursday the National Archives released thousands of the JFK documents.
But the FBI-CIA would not allow the release of all of the documents. Around 3% of the JFK documents are still being withheld from release to the public — more than 50 years after the assassination. What are they hiding?
Carlson spoke to someone with direct knowledge of the assassination and asked if the CIA was involved. The reply: “The answer is yes. I believe they were involved.”
Many of us have suspected this for a long time. It makes sense when we consider that they were the ones who started demonizing the idea of “conspiracy theories” in the first place. Today’s stigma against “conspiracy theorists” is a direct result of the CIA’s propaganda and control agenda with the initial sole purpose of covering up their involvement in the assassination.
What does all this mean? According to Carlson, the implications extend from before the assassination all they way to now because of what it means about our system of government.
“It means that within the U.S. government there are forces wholly beyond democratic control,” he said. “These forces are more powerful than the elected officials that supposedly oversee them. These forces can affect election outcomes. They can even hide their complicity in the murder of an American president. In other words, they can do pretty much whatever they want. They constitute a government within a government mocking by their very existence the idea of democracy.”
Watch:
VIDEO AT LINK................
At this point it would be more shocking to find out the CIA wasn’t involved than proving that they were. It prompts the question of what else they’ve done to America over the decades to maintain their power at the detriment of the people.
JFK gave a speech a week before his death where he said he was going to reveal deep secrets that he had learned as president
I was 10 and even I knew it was a setup...................
JFK fired Director Allen Dulles after Bay of Pigs. That would be a start.
I was just adding to the list of possible motives
The more one thinks, or remembers, about those times, the longer that list becomes.
Perhaps to make him look like a communist since was an outspoken anti communist
This quote by Ayn Rand, from over a half-century ago, is prophetic about the state of the U.S. government.
“The great oak tree had stood on a hill over the Hudson, in a lonely spot on the Taggart estate. Eddie Willers, aged seven, liked to come and look at that tree. It had stood there for hundreds of years, and he thought it would always stand there. Its roots clutched the hill like a fist with fingers sunk into the soil, and he thought that if a giant were to seize it by the top, he would not be able to uproot it, but would swing the hill and the whole of the earth with it, like a ball at the end of a string. He felt safe in the oak tree's presence; it was a thing that nothing could change or threaten; it was his greatest symbol of strength.
One night, lightning struck the oak tree. Eddie saw it next morning. It lay broken in half, and he looked into its trunk as into the mouth of a black tunnel. The trunk was only an empty shell; its heart had rotted away long ago; there was nothing inside-just a thin gray dust that was being dispersed by the whim of the faintest wind. The living power had gone, and the shape it left had not been able to stand without it.”
― Ayn Rand, Atlas Shrugged
Walker lived in Highland Park, a very upscale section of Dallas. The shot was fired at night, from the alley behind the house. Seems pretty risky.
JFK had expressed a desire to break up the CIA
Yeah, but (ex CIA agent) William F. Buckley once said "you could tell it was a CIA operation because everyone in the room was killed, except the target."
I believe that line was in one of his Blackford Oakes stories.
Conspiracy: CIA Killed Monroe, Mafia Killed JFK in retaliation.
Fun Fact: JFK won his election through fraud too. I seen historic films of people jumping up and clapping over his assignation. He was not the glorified hero of today.
Thank you all who answered my motive question.
> Both JFK and Jackie were the targets. Connolly was hit by accident..................
this is the first time that i have heard that jackie was also a target. source (if you happen to have handy)?
Certainly, the CIA and FBI knew Oswald and were monitoring him on an occasional basis. A former Marine does not move to Russia, marry a Russian woman and live there for a year without their keeping tabs on the guy.
Oswald had more than one connection with CIA assets: Clay Shaw in New Orleans and George De Morenscheilds (sp?) in Dallas. The CIA also knew he went to the Russian Embassy in Mexico City and had pictures of him there that their people took.
Oswald kills JFK. When the CIA connection is made the CIA knew they would be called on the carpet. That was when the CIA went full out to make sure Oswald was to be charged as a lone gunman. Their invovlment was to protect themselves to avoid any blame.
For sure, I was raised in The South, and he was not liked by a lot of Southern DEMOCRATS. That's why he was in Texas in the first place. Having just come from Miami, IIRC, he was on a campaign swing through The South to shore up his sagging support there.
When I was a paperboy in 1968-1972, I had a customer that refused to take a Kennedy Half Dollar from me as change for paying his bill. Kennedy was hated by a lot of people and they celebrated his death. But the MSM will never show or tell about such things....................
> Open questions: Earlier that year Oswald attempted to kill General Walker and almost succeeded. Did the CIA put him up to that as well?
IIRC the LHO-patsy theory goes along the lines that LHO had nothing to do with any of the shootings including Walker.
IIRC LHO was never formally charged with shooting Walker and so never got a chance to defend himself in court from this (never-formalized, not to mention never convicted) accusation.
Due to the amount of obfuscation surrounding the jfk assassination, oswald’s widow’s testimony should be discounted as possibly tainted. she was alone with a kid and financially vulnerable to being bribed to say whatever she was paid to say. and in any case, it is hearsay since she was not a firsthand witness to any shooting.
The fact that some people seem to take it as a fact that LHO shot Walker is just an indicator of how deep the USA public has been brainwashed into believing the LHOLN theory and discredited all competing theories as “conspiracy theory.”
“Conspiracy theory” as a pejorative has its origin in the aftermath of the JFK assassination.
I was 12, and had just received dispensation to obtain my Eagle Scout Rank, instead of waiting until 13, and was presented my rank in a ceremony on Nov 22, 1963.
My Eagle card — which I still carry laminated — is dated and signed by JFK (Honorary BSA President) on Nov 20th, 1963.
I knew something wasn’t “right”, but had no idea of “what”, until years later.
They are probably withholding the documents naming George Herbert Walker Bush. 😐
B-13. If you don’t know what that means look up the TV show “Scandal”. It ran on ABC a few years back. Starred Kelly Washington as a high-end PR insider who was also romantically connected with the president.
The show was mostly a soap opera, but it did have some interesting takes on DC politics, stealing elections (”The Defiance smart card worked. We won”) and the DS which seemed like pure screen writer fiction at the time. Not so sure anymore.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.