Skip to comments.
Supreme Court Considers Case Seeking to Overturn 2020 Presidential Election
Republic Brief ^
| 14/12/22
| Kari Donovan
Posted on 12/14/2022 11:39:26 AM PST by Eleutheria5
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-39 last
To: Eleutheria5
21
posted on
12/14/2022 3:45:31 PM PST
by
philman_36
(Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
To: SFConservative
The voter rolls haven’t been accurate for a very long time.
To: Wayne07
Amen to that. Isn’t this the case that is only to be considered for acceptance? The is like a 1 in a thousand chance that the USSC would take it up. Ridiculous overhyped clickbait.
23
posted on
12/14/2022 5:08:59 PM PST
by
Seruzawa
("The Political left is the Garden of Eden of incompetence" - Marx the Smarter (Groucho))
To: Eleutheria5
Yep. It will take a miracle for the SC to hear it. They have refused to even consider a hearing before now.
Overturning the election would invalidate every EO and piece of legislation that Biden has signed.
24
posted on
12/14/2022 6:42:58 PM PST
by
Blood of Tyrants
(Inside every leftist is a blood-thirsty fascist yearning to be free of current societal constraints.)
To: Eleutheria5
An ice cubes chance in hell of this going anywhere.
To: lewislynn
“This is John Roberts/Bush/Obama/Biden/McConnell/Murdoch(I repeat myself) chance to shove it to Trump once again.”
Supported by Bushites Kavanaugh and Barrett
To: Jewbacca
Unfortunately this is the most likely outcome.
To: Eleutheria5
Everyone knows they are not going to do JACK, because it would reveal their own complicitness in the steal!
28
posted on
12/14/2022 10:41:37 PM PST
by
Safrguns
To: Safrguns
Complicity, not “complicitness”. And they might do something regardless. Remember Mr. Smith Goes to Washington? In the end, the crooked senior senator confessed and helped. Art does imitate life, but usually life imitates art in surprising ways, which is why jokes told by Rush became Dem policy so often.
29
posted on
12/15/2022 2:44:43 AM PST
by
Eleutheria5
(Free country? Good morning, Rip. )
To: Eleutheria5
I knew there was something wrong with that, but got lazy
30
posted on
12/15/2022 6:22:52 AM PST
by
Safrguns
To: Eleutheria5
This is so misleading. The case has been conferenced with hundreds of others. It is unlikely to be discussed by the Justices and will be put on the deny list that gets released after the conference.
To: SoConPubbie
well, maybe it’s people who don’t read and only post?
32
posted on
12/16/2022 8:13:29 AM PST
by
Segovia
To: PatriotarchyQ
This is so misleading. The case has been conferenced with hundreds of others. It is unlikely to be discussed by the Justices and will be put on the deny list that gets released after the conference.
SCOTUS gets thousands of pro se cases each year. Most don't make it this far as they get rejected by clerk for some reason. In this case, the clerk appears to have favored the petitioner and allowed amendment of the submission. This is a unique argument, i.e., that Congress had a duty to investigate election fraud, although, the venue in Utah is likely wrong for most respondents.
33
posted on
12/16/2022 9:22:42 AM PST
by
Dr. Franklin
("A republic, if you can keep it." )
To: Dr. Franklin
Every petition is set for conference whether pro se or not. It is fairly rare for a petition to be so screwed up as needing amendment.
To: PatriotarchyQ
Every petition is set for conference whether pro se or not. It is fairly rare for a petition to be so screwed up as needing amendment.
No, many get "bounced" for not being timely filed, not following the court rules, etc. I haven't seen the stats in recent years, but 20 years ago, only about 30% of petitions to SCOTUS made it to conference.
35
posted on
12/16/2022 9:13:32 PM PST
by
Dr. Franklin
("A republic, if you can keep it." )
To: Eleutheria5
To: Senator Goldwater
Judicial Watch or one of these type of activist Conservative lawyer groups ought to get something in front of the high court demonstrating that things like mail-in month long balloting cannot be verified by election boards, and as such, are prone to fraud. If this could happen we would have Colorado back.
37
posted on
12/17/2022 7:46:27 PM PST
by
MileHi
((Liberalism is an ideology of parasites, hypocrites, grievance mongers, victims, and control freaks.)
To: Yo-Yo
That’s OK, this is important.
38
posted on
12/20/2022 5:11:27 PM PST
by
Shady
(The #JihadJunta: "We are now a nation of Men, Not of Laws. You are not as equal as we are...")
To: ClearCase_guy
The point is that depending on the tossup states, either judges or secretaries of state usurped legislative laws that establish the appointment of electors.
If the court rules that such usurpation exists, then it could and should toss that state’s electors.
39
posted on
12/23/2022 7:58:09 AM PST
by
Jacquerie
(ArticleVBlog.com)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-39 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson