I give you an "F".
Posted on 12/05/2022 5:24:08 PM PST by Nextrush
What Trump meant .....It is the massive election fraud that has terminated rule of laws and constitution
Democrats are twisting to mean that Trump wants to terminate constitution to remedy election fraud,
President Trump was elected president not once but twice by a landslide both times. The STEAL 2.0 in 2020 is so transparent and if not rectified with retribution and restorations all is lost. 44 and 46 are both illegitimate.
One is supposed to be gone and it is time for the second with corrupt company including aformentioned to be expunged.
He needs to start suing these lying cretins. Notice, I refuse to call them reporters, because they aren't.
I give you an "F".
He expressed himself badly...
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
He says incredibly stupidly worded things,....
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I totally disagree... the longer this has gone on, the more brilliant this statement has proved to be.
There isn’t a constitutional means of correcting a fraudulent election, and Trump is correct that nothing has been done to fix it so it won’t happen again.
With Democrats and do nothing Republicans, there is no solution to this particular one of election manipulation. That would be my question to Trump. What do you propose to solve this, Mr. Trump, because those of us who believe the election was not fair or free have no political power to fix it.
1913. But I’m a Radical.
Why, a Red Wave in 2024!! Hold our noses again for the Republicans!
Totally being facetious here
Give us a break. Your going to get carpel tunnel syndrome from clutching your pearls so hard.
2A. That’s the last avenue for correcting this.
Anyone who thinks otherwise is fooling themselves.
The problem is that the Constitution expects honest elections to be held by each state, thus the Constitution has no method for addressing the problem. Thus far, the parties that “should” be addressing the problem (state legislatures) have refused to do so.
—
I’ve been thinking about this issue. It seems it is pretty much a given from instructions you might get with a new appliance, to the rules for a game like chess, to the laws for running a government; they can all describe how something is to be operated in a proper way, or how the game is to be played, but once people decide to willfully violate the rules there are too many possibilities to cover to try and contain their behavior. And by the very nature of what they are doing, they’re willfully violating the rules of the game.
Ultimately laws or rules will only work if it’s mutually agreed by all parties to follow the rules. Once that contract is broken, everything falls. The trust is broken. All that is left is barbarism.
Much the same happened in Ancient Rome. There was a set of laws which governed the Republic. Then laws were subverted. Then the rule of laws was replaced by the rule of man and a succession of emperors with numerous intervening civil wars to grab control. A reversion to a more primitive tribal form of rule by might.
“Trump’s actual post on Truthsocial:
“A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution.””
____
I read it as Trump saying that the massive fraud itself was the termination of all rules, regulations, articles, and even those found in the Constitution. Not that HE should be allowed to violate the Constitution.
It made sense to me what he was saying. The corporate media is the one who twisted it and said he said otherwise. And then the never-Trumper GOPe just ran with it, as did many conservatives.
“He had to have known it would be spun this way, so...?”
Everything he ever says is twisted by the media.
How is the FBI covering up criminal activity and lying about the veracity of documented evidence “Constitutional”? This is what happened. This is the problem. Not President Trump.
We? How?
He was channeling John Adams’s words to the Massachusetts Militia.
It never seems to stop. He does not choose to learn.
I'll support, and vote for Trump if he does get the nom. Unlikely event that he makes it to be.
And what exactly are those that steps that must be immediately taken that are also authorized by the Constitution?
Oh, right. There aren't any. That's why he said “A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution. He had to say that because the Constitution itself doesn't authorize any "immediate steps" to remove a sitting President and replace him with the guy who claims he should have been declared the winner. So, he argued that the fraud wiped out the normal Constitutional limits.
And that's why so many people have a problem with his statement. Now that he's getting backlash, he's trying to claim he didn't say what he very clearly did.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.