Posted on 09/07/2022 7:09:49 AM PDT by libstripper
MIAMI — In her just over 20 months as a federal judge, Aileen M. Cannon worked mostly in obscurity, becoming nominated and appointed to her position during the height of the coronavirus pandemic and at the end of a turbulent presidency.
Then, last month, she was assigned the most prominent case of her short judicial career, involving the very person who put her on the bench: former President Donald J. Trump.
On Monday, Judge Cannon granted Mr. Trump’s request to appoint an independent arbiter known as a special master to review materials seized last month from his private Florida club. The extraordinary and unusually broad decision, which could delay the criminal investigation into Mr. Trump, drew scrutiny from experts who questioned her legal reasoning and criticized some of the language in her opinion about what rights a former president is entitled to.
(Excerpt) Read more at msn.com ...
Do the liberals oppose proper legal procedures, such as verifying the documents seized are the ones covered by the secret search warrant???
********
Only if it’s a liberal Democrat that’s under investigation.
“What is so controversial, about the special master, who will review the documentation?”
Nothing at all. Lefties say “oh this sets a precedent and everyone who is being investigated will demand this and it will slow prosecutions”. But of course, not everyone is the former President of the United States. And most criminal suspects are not subject to an overly broad, invalid on its face search warrant that is designed for a politically-motivated fishing expedition. Criminal prosecutors are usually very careful about search warrants because if they are not, they destroy their own ability to make a successful prosecution.
Then there is the fact that the special master must be approved by both parties. So even the lefties complaining that the Trump-appointed judge might be biased can’t make the same argument about the special master. If the master is biased, then that will be the DOJ’s fault for approving them.
The real complaint, that the left won’t say out loud, is that the appointment ensures that there is no chance of a Trump indictment weeks before the November election. That’s what has their panties in a knot.
Indeed. Without the ability to mold, shape, distort, fabricate and selectively leak information to sway the public AND any Grand Jurors, pre-empaneled, these biased partisan FBI and DOJ jackboots cannot ‘create new evidence.’
If they don’t like it, then they can escalate it. Let’s escalate it to the USSC for a ruling and then they, MSM, Democrat sycophant politicians and operatives can then just STFU.
“The extraordinary and unusually broad...”
Funny, I don’t recall the NYT saying that about the search warrant that “authorized” the FBI to seize everything, including Trump’s medical records, tax records, thousands of photographs, some of his clothes, and attorney-client materials.
such as the judge who signed the order to raid his home?
From the article. “The extraordinary and unusually broad decision,...” That pretty much describes the warrant.
“.. The extraordinary and unusually broad decision, ..”
The only extraordinary and unusually broad decision was for a judge or magistrate to issue a search warrant against a former president of the US. That judge should go down in infamy.
Partisan Media Shills and Stooges alert.
It was also an extraordinary and unusually broad decision to rifle a former First Lady's undies drawer.
I wonder if the NYT ever does profiles of Democratic appointed judges. Or maybe the Republican appointed judges are the only ones that, in the opinion of the NYT, aren’t qualified to practice law . . .
More experts.
The distinction between what is admitted “at trial” and what is taken by the FBI “during the investigation” seems to be completely irrelevant once it was determined that PRIVILEGED material (attorney-client, for example) was taken from the residence during the search.
I hate that stupid media phrase “raises eyebrows.”
The warrant was “unusually broad” if you ask me.
It was a “search and seizure” totally UNCONSTITUTIONAL.
Judge Robert’s chief of staff recently resigned. Was he the leaker?
Whether this judge or another down the road, the question of equal treatment has to be raised. Has NARA and the DOJ also done a raid and inventory of the homes of Carter, Bush, Clinton, Obama?
So true. Especially clinton
I see that gAG Barr has an opinion on a case he learned about from MSM? How about the yeomans work you did burying the Franklin Scandal, where Boystown orphans were used in DC to be parking devices for those in power in DC, even the White House with GHWBoooosh. Or how his “best friend”Robert Muller was a fine man with a great mind, until we learn he is in a class with one other great mind...Joe Bai din.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.