John Roberts: An Enemy of the Rule of Law

Frontpage Mag ^ | 7-5-2022 | Matthew Vadum

[servo1969]

[Caipirabob]

One word: Obamacare.

[nikos1121]

Gutless. The SC could have ruled 9-0 and it would have done more to unite this country than anything else, but instead the dissenters put up an argument that makes no sense....

[tennmountainman]

Robert’s is no Conservative, but a Bushite.
Shame on Bush for appointing him.

[Tupelo]

Judicial opinions written with public opinion in mind is like laws drawn up and passed immediately after a tragedy are usually bad. Think back to the antiterrorism laws passed after 9/11.
Now think of Dred Scott, Plessy v Ferguson and Roe v Wade. ALL written by a Supreme Court thinking more of public opinion than The Constitution and subsequently overturned.
I really believe Obamacare will suffer the same fate someday.

[LibertyWoman]

.

[newfreep]

Robert’s is no Conservative, but a Bushite.

Bush almost gave us Harriet Miers, another leftist like Dread Pirate Roberts.

[JonPreston]

Grinnin’ John!

[Still Thinking]

I might buy the blackmail theory but not the emotional stress theory from the SOTU. If Ebola said that about my court when it wasn’t true, I’d make it my mission in life that his policies never won another fight if I had anything to say about it. Show him what it was like when it really was true (plus give him what he deserved).

[ronnie raygun]

How twisted is Chief Justice John Roberts?
Just ask Obama. An illegal adoption has its consequences extortion has its rewards

[MachIV]

Has any of the Bushes weighed in on the Supreme Court’s ruling?

[Nateman]

Sadly, no Supreme Court Justice has ever been removed. The closest thing I can think of is William Matthew Merrick who had his court dissolved by Congress to get rid of him. He was a United States Circuit Judge of the United States Circuit Court of the District of Columbia.

[Ken522]

The Roberts opinion, on the other hand, reflects the disordered mind of a troubled man desperate for attention and approval.

This statement describing Roberts provides a clear summary of the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court ...

[lgjhn23]

“..How twisted is Chief Justice John Roberts?
Just ask Obama. An illegal adoption has its consequences extortion has its rewards...”

^THIS^
And that’s not even mentioning a romp or two on Epstein’s Island.
He is completely compromised on any decision....and it shows like a bright light.

[cranked]

RobertsIdiot was blue pilled a long time ago.

[JonPreston]

The number of personality disorders among our political class is probably 100%

[mewzilla]

Roberts is Deep State.

And Deep State now controls the SCOTUS.

[fortes fortuna juvat]

How abortion will be regulated will be left, as it should be, to small-D democratic processes in the 50 states.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
WRONG! The Dobbs majority opinion is wrong for the same fundamental reason that Roe was wrong. Abortion is an egregious violation of the U.S. Constitution for the simple reason that human life begins at conception, and therefore every such life should be guaranteed exactly the same Constitutional protection that Chief Justice John Roberts enjoys.

[Elsie]

...every such life should be guaranteed exactly the same Constitutional protection ...

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal,

 that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights,

 that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--

 

That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men,

 deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --

 

That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends,

 it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government,

 laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form,

 as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.

[Reddy]

Also Obergfell. What a case of judicial overreach when even the state of California had voted to ban same sex “marriage” in 2008. Zero and Brandon had even campaigned they were also against homosexual marriage at that time.

Suddenly, by 2015, zero was all on board and a 5-4 USSC pulled the right to homosexual “marriage” out of their orifices, with Kennedy writing, “Their (homosexuals) hope is not to be condemned to live in loneliness, excluded from one of civilization’s oldest institutions.” What? That’s why you are voting for this? It’s a popularity contest?