Posted on 06/12/2022 10:49:08 AM PDT by ChicagoConservative27
Fox News analysts Karl Rove said on this week’s broadcast of “Fox News Sunday” that unless protesters were arrested outside the houses of Supreme Court Justices, it is “open season on judges.”
Discussing the arrest of an armed man outside Justice Brett Kavanaugh’s home, Rove said, “The American Civil Liberties Union says this statue, we interpret at the following way, we point to a Supreme Court Case that suggests that as long as they keep moving in front of the house, If they are stationary, they should be arrested but if they are moving in front of the house have a right to try and influence a Supreme Court Justice. That is ridiculous.”
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
They didn’t arrest BLM rioters and it became ‘open season on civilization.’ Why is porpoise-head jumping in, now.
Karl Rove hasn’t heard about the First Amendment I guess.
Protests should be OK unless they harm life or property for starters.
Rove’s real motive is legislation to prevent patriots from protesting outside the homes of RINO’s like him when they take away our Second Amendment rights as they are slowly doing under the pressure of emotional events.
It wouldn't be "open season" on judges. It would be by direct order from the left on certain judges only.
-PJ
Did Karl’s whiteboard tell him to say that??
"Williams said, “You have a right to protest anywhere in America. Now clearly, these people should not be violent, and they shouldn’t threaten. But the idea that they’re influencing. I don’t think it’s about the influence. I think it’s about a Supreme Court that’s become radical, and extremist, and activist and is going to put out a decision that’s going to — believe me — polarize this country. Undo 50 years of law.”"
That being said, I think it's against the law to protest in front of judges houses.
Abortion is murder ... why would anyone think these infanticide loving dogs wouldn’t get violent?
If they dox'd the wise latina or that ex-law professor I must have missed it. They might have went after Breyer had he not 'decided' to step down.
That’s exactly why they’re not being arrested.
Anyone who agrees with Juan Williams on anything is automatically in the wrong.
Williams is right to say non-violent protests are First Amendment protected. I can go that far with him.
People protested in Idaho back in 2020 outside the homes of the health board officials voting for mask orders and nobody got arrested for it because the First Amendment protects it.
The Idaho Republican Party denounced the protests as extremist and racist they were even linked to Ant-Semitism but the Patriots-Trump Supporters-Medical Freedom activists did it back there in December of 2020.
They protested COVID tyranny in front of health board officials homes to the hoots and howls of government officials, the mainstream media and as mentioned earlier the Idaho Karl Rove-type GOP.
So, Juan, you would agree that the desegregation cases were wrongly decided?
As things get worse due to climate policy in this country you will want the right to protest in front of government officials homes like the farmers did in the Netherlands this weekend.
They will have to kill off their livestock to comply with the climate policy restrictions on them.
The linked story comes with translation prompt to read it in English
A local radio host had a caller who said he was a unitarian. Every time the guy would call in, his first line was: “I disagree with you completely.” That is Juan Williams; he is paid to be the token opposition to conservatism. Could he possibly be stupid enough to believe everything he says? Yes.
Karl finally pretends to get it.
He has no idea what is really going on.
The statute applies to judges and jurors, not everyone. Its purpose is to prevent undue influence being exercised on judges or jurors, something that does not apply in the case of ordinary people. Further, the mere presence of a crowd in front of a judge’s or juror’s home carries an inherent threat because anyone in that crowd could be carrying a gun or other weapon. In this case we saw exactly that happen when a particular thug, dressed in Antifa black and equipped with a full arsenal of murder and kidnapping weapons, appeared in front of Justice Kavanaugh’s house. That was a profound threat of violence designed for one purpose: to terrorize Kavanaugh into into changing his potential vote on the abortion issue. After all, how would you feel if you were a litigant in a case and your opponent was able to intimidate the judge into ruling against you when the law and facts were on your side? Karl Rove made an excellent point.
The First Amendment threatened by RINO’s as well as the Second as evidenced in this gun control deal being cut in Washington DC this weekend.
The Constitution is First and the right to protest is threatened.
If something bad happens with this abortion ruling the RINO’s will line up to restrict protest and this will haunt people wanting to protest evils like mask orders, vaccine orders and climate change restrictions in the future.
As strange as it may sound and seem, I agree with you.
Anyone who believes things will get better has not read the Bible.
When I first travelled to China and saw the Forbidden City, I couldn’t imagine what kind of government and society built such a thing to hide away its leaders and central government officials.
Now I understand exactly why empires build such things.
A protest is by definition an act to influence others. If they say they are protesting and not trying to influence, then they are doing something else....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.