Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Nextrush

The statute applies to judges and jurors, not everyone. Its purpose is to prevent undue influence being exercised on judges or jurors, something that does not apply in the case of ordinary people. Further, the mere presence of a crowd in front of a judge’s or juror’s home carries an inherent threat because anyone in that crowd could be carrying a gun or other weapon. In this case we saw exactly that happen when a particular thug, dressed in Antifa black and equipped with a full arsenal of murder and kidnapping weapons, appeared in front of Justice Kavanaugh’s house. That was a profound threat of violence designed for one purpose: to terrorize Kavanaugh into into changing his potential vote on the abortion issue. After all, how would you feel if you were a litigant in a case and your opponent was able to intimidate the judge into ruling against you when the law and facts were on your side? Karl Rove made an excellent point.


16 posted on 06/12/2022 11:18:58 AM PDT by libstripper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: libstripper

The First Amendment threatened by RINO’s as well as the Second as evidenced in this gun control deal being cut in Washington DC this weekend.

The Constitution is First and the right to protest is threatened.

If something bad happens with this abortion ruling the RINO’s will line up to restrict protest and this will haunt people wanting to protest evils like mask orders, vaccine orders and climate change restrictions in the future.


17 posted on 06/12/2022 11:23:48 AM PDT by Nextrush (FREEDOM IS EVERBODY'S BUSINESS-REMEMBER PASTOR NIEMOLLER)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson