Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Chief Justice John Roberts launches investigation into REAL Roe v. Wade leak and insists it is NOT the Supreme Court's final decision
UK Daily Mail ^ | 5/3/2022 | Morgan Phillips

Posted on 05/03/2022 9:20:48 AM PDT by fruser1

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last
To: fruser1

It’s an integrity tax.


41 posted on 05/03/2022 9:35:36 AM PDT by blackdog (Today's "disinformation" most often turns out to be tomorrow's facts. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurker

He will get back to us in about 700 years.


42 posted on 05/03/2022 9:35:37 AM PDT by rdl6989 ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Does Smilin’ John still collect little Irish babies?


43 posted on 05/03/2022 9:36:09 AM PDT by JonPreston (Q: Never have so many, been so wrong, so often)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Lurker
Oh boy. Another Investigation

Point with pride, view with alarm, investigate to infinity. The Washington DC code.

I forgot get the cash up front!

44 posted on 05/03/2022 9:36:24 AM PDT by Don Corleone (leave the gun, take the canolis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: fruser1
Once he empties and changes his Depends, he'll be quick to ensure the ruling in Roe v. Wade is confirmed. Toberts is as firm and steadfast as a flag waving in a breeze!
45 posted on 05/03/2022 9:42:44 AM PDT by A Formerly Proud Canadian ( Ceterum autem censeo Justinius True-dope-us esse delendam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino

“Dirt not needed on Roberts. He’s a progressions all on his own. He did pro-bono work early in the cause for homo marriage in Colorado. He doesn’t need to be blackmailed to support the cause.”

I have often said the same yet some insist it must be some sort of blackmail conspiracy thing. :-)


46 posted on 05/03/2022 9:43:12 AM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: A Formerly Proud Canadian

Fat fingers on a cell phone. To erase should be ROBERTS!


47 posted on 05/03/2022 9:45:03 AM PDT by A Formerly Proud Canadian ( Ceterum autem censeo Justinius True-dope-us esse delendam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: fruser1

The fbi will get right on it.


48 posted on 05/03/2022 9:49:15 AM PDT by bray (The Vax is fake and deadly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fruser1

Consider.

Leaked o dark thirty.

Within

minutes

fence went up around s.c. building.
( as if someone knew leak was coming ? )

Protesters show up at o dark thirty with professional made signs
( as if protesters knew leak was coming and already had signs made ?)

Yesterday court installed brand new Marshal for s.c. security

( as if a politically reliable marshal was going to be needed ?)

White House has detailed statement ready to roll

( as if TalyBiden knew leak was coming ?)

KJB , who has no position on natural rights , is in the batters box

waiting to replace a right or left s.c. judge.

Who always pulls shiftycrap at I dark thirty ?


49 posted on 05/03/2022 9:52:03 AM PDT by cuz1961 (USCGR Veteran )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fruser1

My money is on the just added radical BLM sympathizer.


50 posted on 05/03/2022 9:52:27 AM PDT by genxer ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fruser1

You can bet he is conferencing with the Justices now yelling “DON’T YOU SEE WHAT IS HAPPENING? WAAAAAHHHAHHHH!!!!” YOU CAN’T OVERRIDE!! YOU JUST CAN’T WAHHHHAHHHAHH!!!”


51 posted on 05/03/2022 9:59:36 AM PDT by Shady (The #JihadJunta: "We are now a nation of Men, Not of Laws. You are not as equal as we are...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chauncey Gardiner

I think you are right.


52 posted on 05/03/2022 10:00:15 AM PDT by Shady (The #JihadJunta: "We are now a nation of Men, Not of Laws. You are not as equal as we are...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: fruser1
Well of course it isn't the final decision. It's a draft.
53 posted on 05/03/2022 10:07:13 AM PDT by Bruce Campbells Chin (Sounds like a lot of malarkey to be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bruce Campbells Chin

But is the draft based on the votes of the Justices, or do they change their votes as other opinions are added? I always thought they took a vote, then assigned one of each side to write their opinion.


54 posted on 05/03/2022 10:19:36 AM PDT by Betty Jane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Alas Babylon!

This is a nothing burger. If the wimpy judges, chief of whom is Roberts, were too scared to do anything about election fraud and the Constitutional issues involved in the Pennsylvania case, they certainly won’t do anything about Roe v Wade. Roberts will have another one of his screaming fits as he did with the election challenges. He’ll tell the junior justices to sit down and shut up. They’ll comply because they don’t want their houses fire bombed.

Roe v Wade will stand. Count on it.


55 posted on 05/03/2022 10:21:45 AM PDT by PA Presbyterian (Never Surrender!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: fruser1

I heard he’s hiring OJ to find the leaker—as soon as he’s done finding the real killer.


56 posted on 05/03/2022 10:22:33 AM PDT by Antoninus (Republicans are all honorable men.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chauncey Gardiner

Roberts will find the leaker about the same time OJ finds the “real killer”.


57 posted on 05/03/2022 10:29:42 AM PDT by Tell It Right (1st Thessalonians 5:21 -- Put everything to the test, hold fast to that which is true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: fruser1

It’s tantamount to an insurrection, in my opinion.


58 posted on 05/03/2022 10:45:12 AM PDT by Hildy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fruser1

Leak will have its intended effect. Roe will be upheld 6-3 or 7-2. Only Thomas and Alito are sure votes...Gorsuch a maybe. Barret and Kavenaugh will vote with the Libs following the leak...maybe even Gorsuch.


59 posted on 05/03/2022 10:54:07 AM PDT by damper99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Betty Jane

Generally, the draft majority opinion means you have that many justices committed to that view, and it’s just a matter of refining the language. On rare occasions, a judge may flip their vote after seeing the draft. It also can impact whether concurring opinions are written, etc..


60 posted on 05/03/2022 10:59:17 AM PDT by Bruce Campbells Chin (Sounds like a lot of malarkey to be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson