Democrats To Explore Impeachment Options For Conservative Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas

Political Insider ^ | April 27, 2022 | RUSTY WEISS

[Bon of Babble]

Impeachment-happy Democrats are expected to hold a hearing to explore the possibility of impeachment for Supreme Court justices in the wake of controversial messages surfacing from the wife of conservative Justice Clarence Thomas.

[Bon of Babble]

TOMORROW: At 2PM EDT, House Judiciary will consider the impact of the Supreme Court’s lack of a clearly applicable code of ethics and will examine other reforms that could promote transparency and accountability.

[Bon of Babble]

How many Republicans will help with this?

[CivilWarBrewing]

The DemonRats are concerned about ETHICS?

ROFL!!!!!

[ClearCase_guy]

Like they impeached Scalia?

[Eagles6]

At least 2, directly.

A number of others by 🙈🙉🙊

[JonPreston]

I hate Ds, but they sure push their anti-American agenda leaving the Rs dazed and confused.

[Mr Ramsbotham]

“It was all Mrs. Bumble. She would do it,” urged Mr. Bumble; first looking round to ascertain that his partner had left the room.

“That is no excuse,” replied Mr. Brownlow. “You were present on the occasion of the destruction of these trinkets, and indeed are the more guilty of the two, in the eye of the law; for the law supposes that your wife acts under your direction.”

“If the law supposes that,” said Mr. Bumble, squeezing his hat emphatically in both hands, “the law is a ass—a idiot. If that’s the eye of the law, the law is a bachelor; and the worst I wish the law is, that his eye may be opened by experience—by experience.”

[frnewsjunkie]

Steve Bannon is doing the only thing that will fix this nation from lying scum!

Bannon is on a mission..
DESTROYING THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY

[irishjuggler]

The ‘Rats are absurd. Impeachment is for “high crimes and misdemeanors.” It’s a fundamental principle of Anglo-Saxon jurisprudence that every person is responsible for his or her own crimes. The crimes of one spouse are not automatically imputed to the other spouse. If your wife murders someone, they can’t imprison you unless you helped. Even if Mrs Thomas did something wrong (and she didn’t), how is that a crime of Clarence Thomas?

[stratboy]

I have to agree. They do fight.

We had a fighter (Trump), but the GOPe wouldn’t support him.

Pelosi has more balls than any of the GOPe.

[Wonder Warthog]

Sorry Democrats and RINOS...you cannot impeach someone over his wife’s opinions.

[wny]

there’s nothing they won’t try to distract from their own shitshow

[JonPreston]

We had a fighter (Trump), but the GOPe wouldn’t support him

Exactly right.

[stars & stripes forever]

Join with fellow Freepers to declare GOD'S Promise on behalf of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas and his wife, Ginni.

[bert]

They are exploring the writing of their own death warrants.

Impeaching Thomas cries out for the deaths of the impeachers

[crz]

As if they care.

[LIConFem]

I don't see how any of this ends without internecine war. People talk about a
divide, which would be preferable to war, but I don't think the
leftists/globalists would be satisfied with that. It's a global, all-or-nothing game for them.

[MeneMeneTekelUpharsin]

Wow. When does the war start? Are we just going to sit by and let them incrementally kill us? People who would do such as this will kill you when given the opportunity.

[Karliner]

Well he’s obviously not black enough like Shaun King.

[EEGator]

It is legitimately difficult to tell satire from news.