[ChicagoConservative27]

Judge was appointed by Clinton. All I need to know.

[rovenstinez]

I thought that Judges were to be impartial.

[Magnum44]

‘More likely than not’ is not a legal finding. This judge speaks nonsense.

[Lion Den Dan]

I thought judges were to rule based upon the law, not likelyhood. Oh, foolish me.

[blueunicorn6]

We are not a nation of laws.

We are a nation of lawyers.

[DarthVader]

Don’t be impressed by their veneer of respectability. They are traitors through and through.

[JoSixChip]

I can’t believe this will stand, but the msm will have something to talk about for the next couple of months while the appeal takes place.

[eyeamok]

This is the same Scumbag Lawyer in a Dress that did everything he could to STOP Orange County from dealing with the Homeless population.

[LouieFisk]

“more likely than not”
—
He could have ruled “Could be, who knows?”.

[fireman15]

Some of us didn’t realize that the determination of guilt in a court of law is now determined by a judge deciding that what the perpetrator “more likely than not” did the crime.

[wiseprince]

Unrealized gains and Unrealized crimes. Loving the direction of the Lieden administration.

[mikelets456]

I’m “okay” with this ruling IF (Only) they throw all Democrats and politicians in jail for insider trading. Throw all Democrats and certain Republicans in Jail for treason. Throw all Democrats and certain Republicans in jail for not upholding their oath to the Constitution. Throw them all in jail for illegal laws, etc......
Do that first, then maybe....just maybe, I will listen to you!

[M Kehoe]

Road apples.

President Trump could have had the 82nd and 101st “drop” into the “insurrection,” party but didn’t.

Too bad Liz Cheney. It would have been glorious.

5.56mm

[Chode]

“more likely than not”

are you friggin kiddin me???

[Terry L Smith]

i would never accept any jurist’s decision, based on ‘most likely’!!

[Stingray51]

Only a Leftist hack could find that the President exercising core First Amendment rights by speaking at a rally, wherein he did not call for breaking any laws, likely amounted to obstruction of Congress.

[1Old Pro]

Our judicial system is 90% political. There may be 10% honest judges.

[gunsequalfreedom]

What kind of a ruling is “more likely than not”?

[Road Warrior ‘04]

Judge was appointed by Clinton. All I need to know.

Yep!

[Freee-dame]

IIRC, Trump does not use email

[Macoozie]

Interestingly, the Judge’s Wikipedia page has already been update to list this decision.

Bet if it was the oposite, a resounding smack down, it wouldn’t find the light of day.