‘More likely than not’ is not a legal finding. This judge speaks nonsense.
More likely than not = Preponderance of the evidence.
It absolutely is a legal standard.
It’s also what was at issue regarding the crime-fraud exception to the attorney-client privilege at issue here with the e-mails.
It’s fine to disagree with the ruling, but making up nonsense like “’more likely than not’ is not a legal finding” isn’t helpful.
What happened to “Beyond a reasonable doubt?”