Posted on 03/28/2022 9:46:03 AM PDT by janetjanet998
A federal judge has found that former President Donald Trump "more likely than not" committed felony obstruction in the effort to overturn the 2020 presidential election. The judge said Trump's former lawyer John Eastman must turn over documents to the Jan. 6 House committee investigating the attack on the U.S Capitol.
(Excerpt) Read more at abcnews.go.com ...
Name the judge, AP.
Sorta, kinda, maybe, for sure.
Let me get this straight. Trump was asking for investigations and that is obstructing justice?
A just casts a verdict in a case where Trump is not even being tried directly.
How much more inappropriate can it get?
So a mugger beats you and if you try to take him to court, you obstruct justice. What a crock by this lawless regime. And I hate the Asspress more than I have words to describe.
Let me guess. An Obama appointee.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/former-trump-lawyer-john-eastman-155749344.html
“...U.S. District Judge David O. Carter, who is based in Santa Ana, broadly stated that Trump likely committed felony obstruction of Congress...”
Judge David Carter.
Trump was not trying to “overturn” the election. That is begging the question and works on the assumption that Biden’s vote was legitimate. Trump was trying to correct the fraud.
Probably that same guy that sat on the bench for Gen. Flynn.
Isn’t this prejudice an excuse to get a new judge. Might be intentional on the judge’s part to get out of a situation?
The Judge is David Carter. He was appointed by Clinton.
Regarding Carter:
“A U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals panel vacated an order issued by U.S. District Judge Judge David Carter in April that set out a swift timeline for the city and county to shelter people in Skid Row who were experiencing homelessness, as well as to put $1 billion into escrow to address homelessness and conduct audits.”
More Likely Than Not?:
More Likely Than Not!
“More likely than not”
Sounds conclusive.
They are desperate to nail him with some sort of “insurrection” charge. He can’t run in 2024 (or any other year) if they can ram through a verdict.
.
Is this the Wild, Activist Judge that has gone after Trump 20 times?
This guy loathes Trump and is a big DEM Activist:
Amit Mehta
I don’t know if it’s him, but it sounds like his work.
.
.
Not the standard for a crime, but for a civil case.
Thanks!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.