Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Who Is Ketanji Brown Jackson, President Biden’s Supreme Court Nominee? Let's Look at her Judicial Track Record.
Epoch Times ^ | 02/26/2022 | Matthew Vadum

Posted on 02/26/2022 9:03:16 PM PST by SeekAndFind

News analysis

If she is confirmed by the U.S. Senate and becomes the first black woman to serve on the Supreme Court, and if her judicial track record so far is any guide, Ketanji Brown Jackson will probably be a reliable member of the high court’s three-member liberal bloc.

Jackson’s arrival would maintain the current ideological alignment of the court, which now consists of six conservatives–three of whom were appointed by then-President Donald Trump–and three liberals.

Born Ketanji Onyika Brown, Jackson turns 52 this Sept. 14. She would replace retiring Justice Stephen Breyer, who will be 84 on Aug. 15. Jackson previously clerked at the Supreme Court for Breyer, who sings her praises. She is related by marriage to former Speaker of the House Paul Ryan (R-Wisc.), who ran for vice president in 2012 opposing the incumbent at the time, Biden. After hearing of the nomination, Ryan said in a Tweet: “Our politics may differ, but my praise for Ketanji’s intellect, for her character, and for her integrity, is unequivocal.”

Born in the nation’s capital, Jackson moved with her family to Florida when she was young. Her father was chief attorney for the Miami-Dade County School Board. Her mother was principal at a public magnet school. She attended the same high school as Amazon founder Jeff Bezos and U.S. Surgeon General Vivek Murthy, where she was student body president and excelled in debating. She graduated from Harvard College and Harvard Law School. She was a reporter and researcher at Time magazine, worked at four elite law firms, and served in three federal judicial clerkships, as well as a lawyer and commissioner on the U.S. Sentencing Commission as it moved to reduce sentences for drug crimes. In an experience not typical for Supreme Court justices, Jackson worked for two years as a public defender, reports Amy Howe at SCOTUSblog.

When the Washington Post reviewed cases Jackson handled as a federal defender, it reported “she won uncommon victories against the government that shortened or erased lengthy prison terms.”

Her experience as a public defender is a selling point for Democrats. “Before Biden became president, only about 1 percent of federal appellate judges had previously done the kind of work Jackson has done,” reports Joel Mathis at The Week.

Jackson was one of the lawyers on a 2001 friend-of-the-court brief arguing in favor of a Massachusetts law that formed a floating “buffer zone” around pedestrians and automobiles nearing abortion clinics. A federal appeals court allowed the law to stand.

Jackson is now a judge on the influential U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, which has served as a kind of farm team for the high court. Eight other judges from the D.C Circuit have gone on to the Supreme Court, among them the late Antonin Scalia and Ruth Bader Ginsburg. The current Supreme Court justices to come from that court are Clarence Thomas, John Roberts, and Brett Kavanaugh, Ballotpedia reports.

Biden nominated Jackson to the D.C. appellate court on April 19, 2021, and the U.S. Senate confirmed her the following June 14 on a 53-44 vote. She replaced Merrick Garland, who went on to become Biden’s attorney general.

Before that, Jackson was nominated by then-President Barack Obama to be a judge of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. She was confirmed by senators on a voice vote. She served in that post from March 2013 to June 2021.

While a district court judge, Jackson found that parts of three of then-President Donald Trump’s executive orders were in conflict with federal employees’ rights to collective bargaining. Her decision was unanimously reversed by the D.C. Circuit.

In 2019, Jackson rejected Trump White House arguments that executive privilege shielded White House Counsel Don McGahn from a congressional subpoena in connection with special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation of alleged Russian interference in the 2016 election. Jackson wrote in a court opinion that “Presidents are not kings” and that for a president’s senior aides “absolute immunity from compelled congressional process simply does not exist.” Trump’s assertion that he could prevent top advisers from testifying “is a proposition that cannot be squared with core constitutional values, and for this reason alone, it cannot be sustained.” Later, congressional investigators and McGahn’s lawyers cut a deal and he agreed to be questioned in a closed-door session, according to a media outlet’s analysis.

On the same court, the same year, Jackson temporarily prevented the Trump administration’s moving forward with plans to enlarge a program that expedited deportation of illegal aliens. Previously, the program had primarily been used to speed up removals of those who were detained shortly after illegally entering the country from Mexico. It bothered Jackson that the government seemed not to be factoring in how the expanded program would affect illegals and their families who had been residing in the country for as long as two years.

“There is no question in this Court’s mind that an agency cannot possibly conduct reasoned, non-arbitrary decision making concerning policies that might impact real people and not take such real life circumstances into account,” Jackson wrote. The D.C. appeals court, that she would later be elevated to, overturned her decision, finding that the Homeland Security secretary had a free hand to ramp up the program.

Also in 2019, Jackson sided with the Trump administration, turning away environmentalists’ arguments that the administration, in its zeal to expand the border wall with Mexico, had failed to follow environmental laws before moving forward with construction.

Soon after arriving on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, Jackson ruled in favor of government employee unions who were fighting a Trump-era regulation that gave government agencies a freer hand to make changes in the workplace.

It is unclear when the Senate will take up Jackson’s nomination.

Breyer, who was appointed by then-President Bill Clinton in 1994, has said he will retire at the end of the court’s current term, which is expected to end in May or June.



TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; Philosophy; US: District of Columbia; US: Wisconsin
KEYWORDS: bidenvoters; blacksupremacy; districtofcolumbia; jeffbezos; ketanji; ketanjibrownjackson; paulryan; scotus; someblacklady; supremecourt; washingtoncompost; washingtonpost; wisconsin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

1 posted on 02/26/2022 9:03:16 PM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

It’s a good thing we are heading into an election year. The Republicans will have to pretend to Republic in order to win their seats.

She may not get seated. It’s possible.


2 posted on 02/26/2022 9:06:45 PM PST by Jonty30 (How can you claim to help me with my healthcare costs when you can't pay for your own?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

For the sarcasm-deficient, he is dealing out payback for Christine Blasey Ford claiming Bret Kavanaugh raped her.

3 posted on 02/26/2022 9:08:29 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum ("Communism is not love. Communism is a hammer which we use to crush the enemy." ― Mao Zedong [FJB])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

She has a name that sounds like a principle of Kwanzaa, melanin, and estrogen.

Did anything else matter?


4 posted on 02/26/2022 9:13:48 PM PST by lightman (I am a binary Trinitarian. Deal with it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lightman
"Ketanji Brown Jackson"

Sounds like a name of someone who is a virtual signaling affirmative action, politically correct melanin skin with a vagina quota hire.

5 posted on 02/26/2022 9:19:25 PM PST by Enterprise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

A total bum. The dim crat base may whittle down to black women and white suburban Karens in their gated communities. And maybe white neckbeards in urban areas.


6 posted on 02/26/2022 9:19:25 PM PST by KC_Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

all we have to know is that she is a flaming liberal and will never rule objectively-


7 posted on 02/26/2022 9:25:46 PM PST by Bob434
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I don’t care who she is or what she did. The republicans must destroy her and subject her to ever nasty dirty trick and lie the democrats pull on republican nominees. Time to play by their rules


8 posted on 02/26/2022 9:41:23 PM PST by Organic Panic (Democrats. Memories as short as Joe Biden's eyes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

“Ryan said in a Tweet: “Our politics may differ, but my praise for Ketanji’s intellect, for her character, and for her integrity, is unequivocal.””

A liberal with integrity? BWAHAHA! My tagline.


9 posted on 02/26/2022 9:42:59 PM PST by Blood of Tyrants (Inside every liberal is a blood-thirsty fascist yearning to be free of current societal constraints.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

If she had integrity, she wouldn’t be a liberal. All the liberals have their minds made up long before a case gets to their courts.


10 posted on 02/26/2022 9:44:36 PM PST by Blood of Tyrants (Inside every liberal is a blood-thirsty fascist yearning to be free of current societal constraints.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Yousers—she should be stopped on this statement and decision alone:

“There is no question in this Court’s mind that an agency cannot possibly conduct reasoned, non-arbitrary decision making concerning policies that might impact real people and not take such real life circumstances into account,”

She’s talking about the government’s right re: booting illegals here.


11 posted on 02/26/2022 9:47:03 PM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lightman

She doesn’t know it, but Ketanji is Japanese 化炭寺 and means something along the lines of “Charcoal Temple,” which fits in more ways than one


12 posted on 02/26/2022 9:50:49 PM PST by chajin ("There is no other name under heaven given among people by which we must be saved." Acts 4:12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30

“She may not get seated. It’s possible.”

Not a chance she won’t. She’ll get 80 to 90 votes.

There’s nothing our spineless senators fear more than being called racists or sexists.


13 posted on 02/26/2022 9:53:38 PM PST by aquila48 (Do not let them make you "care" ! Guilting you is how they control you. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

She was selected by Biden because she is a black female. Her qualifications do not matter to Biden who is a solid agenda driven demented buffoon.


14 posted on 02/26/2022 10:22:29 PM PST by Dapper 26
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
In the circles I hang with, the big question is where is she on the IRKBA.

She's ruled in two cases that touch the Second:

The first was a case where someone who'd been convicted of a non-violent felony sued claiming that a lifetime prohibition infringed upon the Second. She ruled he lacked standing.

The second was a retired FBI agent who'd not been issued a retired law enforcement national carry ID, because the background check revealed an old criminal conviction. He then had his record expunged, reapplied, received his ID, then sued for damages because of the delay.

Neither of this opinions reveal any deep-seated animosity towards the Second, in my eyes. Her record simply doesn't reveal much.

15 posted on 02/26/2022 10:49:59 PM PST by jdege
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dapper 26

China Joe didn’t select her….the Obama cult selected her….China Joe was eating his ice cream and shitting his pant….he don’t have time for real work…


16 posted on 02/26/2022 11:11:44 PM PST by Hogblog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

The bar is so low at this point. Is she dumber or more partisan than Sotomayor?


17 posted on 02/26/2022 11:24:41 PM PST by KC_Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Kavanaugh has been a real let down. I don’t know how these a-holes sleep at night.


18 posted on 02/27/2022 2:52:10 AM PST by albie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: albie

Kavanaugh was NOT worth the fight we had to seat him HUGE disappointment, he has his nose so far up Roberts ass it is disgusting!!


19 posted on 02/27/2022 2:58:49 AM PST by Trump Girl Kit Cat (Yosemite Sam raising hell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

If they want her we don’t! period


20 posted on 02/27/2022 3:41:04 AM PST by ronnie raygun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson