Posted on 02/12/2022 11:44:21 AM PST by ChicagoConservative27
Hillary Clinton's spokesman knocked The New York Times for not including her statement in a report on the controversy surrounding former President Trump's handling of government records.
The Times ran a report Thursday pointing out how Republicans have so far been "quiet" about the 45th president allegedly keeping classified documents at his residence in Mar-a-Lago in violation of the National Archives and Records Administration policy.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
Hillary wants us all to believe what a trump supposedly did equates in ANY way with what she is known to have done.
Okay violating a policy, allegedly. Compare this to a direct violation of federal law for maintaining a private server containing classified documents. And Hillary did it to run a bribery/money laundering scam with the Clinton Foundation. I mean, when you are deep in a hole, quit digging...
They were probably quiet in order to protect her from people asking her about wiping down servers with bleach.
vs destroying documents as well as EVIDENCE???
Hillary who? She’s irrelevant. Nobody cares what she says.
She’s still obsessed with Trump and hating him. It looks like she wants to be president, so we’re condemned to look at her face and hear her voice for the next 2.6 years.
This whole tempest in a teapot is just another lame attempt by children who have this fixation fantasy of seeing Trump arrested for daring to have been elected president. Presidents leave office at the end of their terms and for many presidents (at least since Clinton for certain), they spirit their ugliest secrets and proof of their scandals away with them. It just so happens that some of those children work for the National Archives and while they didn't have a problem with the Clintons or Obamas walking out with their dirty laundry, Trump's papers have to be held to the highest evidentiary standard because every piece of paper generated during his four years of office could be evidence of an as yet discovered crime.
I have tried to find any real reporting on what was found at Mar-El-Lago and it is “not much”. At worst it appears about 15 totes were mistakenly taken to Florida and were returned when asked for.
Always remember that if Confidential Info. was taken to Mar-El_Lago it must be proven that Trump has criminal intent when he had it moved there. James Comey said so.
bttt
She is talking about the FBI files she stole right?
Or the paperwork explaining her sale of our Uranium to the Russians
Time for science. Most toilets won’t flush a meatloaf dump in 1 flush. Think about trying to flush regular paper down the toilet. Now why would he flush anything down when there are shredders and fireplaces. How did they get an eyewitness to go into the john with Trump? The story smells like a meatloaf dump!
Hillary is relevant.
After all, she’s an expert on “mishandling” classified documents. /s
Hillary Clinton spokesman hits NY Times for omitting statement from report on Trump's records controversyNo problem.
Apparently Fox News, pretending to knock Hillary and the NY Times, is more than willing to bring Trump's records controversy to everyone's attention.
if only Trump had been smart enough to do all his correspondence on a private server inaccessible to government oversight.
Very good point.
and then wiped it clean (like with a cloth) when subpoenaed for its contents.
It was letters from world leaders and mementos. That’s what President Trump possessed.
It’s not like he had 900+ secret FBI files or smashed his blackberries, as was done by drunken Hitlery Rotten Criminal.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.