Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Federal Judge Blocks Biden’s COVID-19 Vaccine Mandate for Federal Contractors in 10 States
Epoch Times ^ | 12/20/2021 | Mimi Nguyen Ly

Posted on 12/20/2021 9:31:12 PM PST by SeekAndFind

A federal judge in Missouri has issued a temporary hold on the Biden administration’s COVID-19 vaccine mandate for federal contractors in 10 U.S. states while litigation plays out.

“We just beat the Biden Administration in court again,” Missouri Attorney General Eric Schmitt announced on Twitter late Monday. “This afternoon, we obtained a preliminary injunction against the vaccine mandate on federal contractors, halting enforcement of that mandate in Missouri and the other states in our coalition.”

The preliminary injunction, issued by U.S. Magistrate Judge David Noce, applies to Alaska, Arkansas, Iowa, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, New Hampshire, North Dakota, South Dakota, and Wyoming. Schmitt and Nebraska Attorney General Doug Peterson, both Republicans, on Oct. 29 co-led the 10 states in suing the Biden administration over the mandate, calling it “unconstitutional, unlawful, and unwise.”

“It will not harm the federal government to maintain the status quo while the courts decide the issues of the President’s authority and the implications for federalism. The Court concludes that, on balance, consideration of the harms and the public interest weigh in favor of a preliminary injunction,” reads the Monday preliminary injunction order from U.S. Magistrate Judge David Noce.

The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Mandate Currently Blocked Nationwide

A nationwide preliminary injunction is already in place blocking the Biden administration’s vaccine mandate for federal contractors, after a federal court in Georgia on Dec. 7 granted the injunction in a separate seven-state lawsuit led by Georgia.

The court had decided to block the mandate for the whole of the United States because a national trade organization—Associated Builders and Contractors (ABC)—was granted permission by the court to intervene in the case as a plaintiff. The states of Alabama, Georgia, Idaho, Kansas, South Carolina, Utah, and West Virginia were the other plaintiffs.

“[G]iven the breadth of ABC’s [nationwide] membership … limiting the relief to only those before the Court would prove unwieldy and would only cause more confusion. Thus, on the unique facts before it, the Court finds it necessary, in order to truly afford injunctive relief to the parties before it, to issue an injunction with nationwide applicability,” U.S. District Judge Stan Baker wrote in the order (pdf).

The COVID-19 vaccine mandate for federal employees and contractors was otherwise going to take effect on Jan. 4, 2022. The deadline was initially set for Dec. 8.

Under the vaccine mandate, issued via executive order by President Joe Biden on Sept. 9, regular COVID-19 testing wouldn’t be an option, but religious or medical exemptions from vaccination may be granted.

Federal contractors that don’t comply may lose out on government contracts.

Another separate ruling on Nov. 30 blocked Biden’s COVID-19 vaccine mandate for federal contractors in three states—Kentucky, Ohio, and Tennessee.



TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Front Page News; Government; US: Alabama; US: Alaska; US: Arkansas; US: Georgia; US: Idaho; US: Iowa; US: Kansas; US: Missouri; US: Montana; US: Nebraska; US: New Hampshire; US: North Dakota; US: South Carolina; US: South Dakota; US: Utah; US: West Virginia; US: Wyoming
KEYWORDS: alabama; alaska; anthonyfauci; arkansas; biden; contractors; covid; covidstooges; daviddnoce; davidnoce; edmissouri; epochtimes; georgia; idaho; iowa; jameshmeredith; jamesmeredith; kansas; kennedyjudge; magistratejudge; mandate; miminguyenly; missouri; montana; nebraska; newhampshire; northdakota; obamacare; osha; southcarolina; southdakota; stanbaker; utah; vaccinemandate; vaccinemandates; westvirginia; wyoming

1 posted on 12/20/2021 9:31:12 PM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Pedo Joe getting b-slapped by magistrate judges, now...

2 posted on 12/20/2021 9:34:39 PM PST by kiryandil (China Joe and Paycheck Hunter - the Chink in America's defenses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I don’t quite follow. It’s already blocked nationwide, but this blocks it in 10 states on top of that? If the nationwide block is shot down in court, this block will still apply in 10 states, is that the reasoning?


3 posted on 12/20/2021 9:35:19 PM PST by TheDandyMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Not even an Article III judge...

 face with tears of joy  face with tears of joy  face with tears of joy  face with tears of joy

4 posted on 12/20/2021 9:35:31 PM PST by kiryandil (China Joe and Paycheck Hunter - the Chink in America's defenses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I thought the bationwide stay was lifted by the Sixth Circuit.


5 posted on 12/21/2021 1:46:38 AM PST by coloradan (They're not the mainstream media, they're the gaslight media. It's what they do. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: coloradan

That’s the OSHA mandate.

But this judgment for Federal workers I thought already happened,not sure what happened again.


6 posted on 12/21/2021 1:59:30 AM PST by CommieCutter (LETS GO BRANDON! 🇺🇸)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
but religious or medical exemptions from vaccination may be granted.

It does not say "Will" it says "May" be granted.

#ComDem legal weasel words.

7 posted on 12/21/2021 2:49:34 AM PST by Texas Fossil ((Texas is not where you were born, but a Free State of Heart, Mind & Attitude!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texas Fossil

“religious or medical exemptions from vaccination may be granted.”

This is the problem for “them”.

How to they come up with justification to deny a medical exemption, provided it is based on a professional medical opinion?

How, and more importantly who decides, can a person’s religious beliefs and practices be questioned?

Romans 14:13 - Let us not therefore judge one another any more: but judge this rather, that no man put a stumbling block or an occasion to fall in his brother’s way.


8 posted on 12/21/2021 3:27:31 AM PST by WinMod70
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: WinMod70

“They” (#ComDem’s) Lie every breath. And they serve the wrong master. They serve the father of lies.

They have ever intention to destroy the USA, freedom in the world and to kill as much of humanity as possible.

At some point, they will be sent to hell with their master.


9 posted on 12/21/2021 3:40:29 AM PST by Texas Fossil ((Texas is not where you were born, but a Free State of Heart, Mind & Attitude!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: kiryandil

WHY is Indiana not in on this lawsuit? Because our AG and Holcomb suck eggs is why.


10 posted on 12/21/2021 5:32:19 AM PST by southernindymom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

You’d think that would be all 50, since it’s equal protection under the law, right?


11 posted on 12/21/2021 6:03:47 AM PST by ro_dreaming ("We seem to have gone from 'We the people' to 'Me, the president' in a scant 8 months." - Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: southernindymom

I’ve wondered the same thing. I was told by someone that Indiana filed its own lawsuit, but that just doesn’t make any sense. Why not join in on lawsuits like these where numbers count? I agree about Holcomb, he’s almost worthless as a governor.


12 posted on 12/21/2021 11:43:38 AM PST by ducttape45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Arthur Wildfire! March; Berosus; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; ...
Up yours, 'Doctor' Jill.

13 posted on 12/21/2021 8:41:16 PM PST by SunkenCiv (Imagine an imaginary menagerie manager imagining managing an imaginary menagerie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: CommieCutter

Sounds like a different case was ruled on, similar to how multiple cases were happening over the OSHA mandate.


14 posted on 12/21/2021 8:51:21 PM PST by matt04 ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson