Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Key GOP senators fear Biden to bypass Constitution to force U.S. corporations to pay global tax
https://justthenews.com ^ | By Bethany Blankley Updated: October 11, 2021 - 11:04pm

Posted on 10/12/2021 11:45:53 AM PDT by Red Badger

Under pact, 20% of profits above 10% margin would be siphoned off by tax authorities in participating countries where corporations operate.

=============================================================================

President Joe Biden and U.S. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen are urging Congress to approve an international agreement for a global corporate tax of 15%, raising alarm among key GOP senators of an administration plan to circumvent the Senate's treaty power under the U.S. Constitution.

Some Republicans argue the global tax — on top of other tax hikes proposed by the Biden administration — would destroy American businesses and worsen the U.S. economy.

The global tax is necessary to respond to an "increasingly globalized and digital global economy," its proponents, the Paris-based Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, an intergovernmental economic organization, argues.

On Friday, 136 countries agreed to implement the plan, which would impact the largest and most profitable multinational companies operating in their countries and around the world. On Saturday, G7 finance ministers met in London and also approved the plan.

The U.K. Treasury has explained the tax proposal, which has two "pillars." Pillar one requires the largest and most profitable multinationals to pay tax in the countries where they operate — not just where their headquarters are located. It applies "to global firms with at least a 10% profit margin — and would see 20% of any profit above the 10% margin subjected to tax in the countries in which they operate. Pillar two creates a minimum 15% global minimum corporation tax operated on a country-by-country basis.

Yellen told ABC News on Sunday that the global tax could be added to the $3.5 trillion budget reconciliation bill currently before Congress.

"I am confident that what we need to do to come into compliance with the minimum tax will be included in a reconciliation package," she said, adding her hope "that it will be passed and we will be able to reassure the world that the United States will do its part."

Requiring the U.S. to participate in a global tax, Republicans argue, would require the U.S. to sign an international tax treaty, which it hasn't done. The Constitution stipulates that only the U.S. Senate can ratify treaties, requiring a two-thirds majority, or 67 votes, to pass.

Following the constitutional process would require all Democrats to vote for it, in addition to 17 Republicans. Because these votes appear to be unlikely, the ranking Republican members of three Senate committees — Finance, Foreign Relations, and Banking — have expressed concerns that the Biden administration would bypass the Constitution, thus usurping Senate powers and compromising the political sustainability of any agreement.

"As described, the nature of changes required to implement Pillar One necessitates the conclusion of a treaty, not a congressional-executive agreement or other legislative override," Senators Mike Crapo (R-Idaho), Jim Risch (R-Idaho) and Pat Toomey (R-Pa.) wrote to Yellen Friday, citing her Banking Committee testimony last week that while a Senate-ratified treaty "would be one way" to gain congressional approval of the tax scheme there were "a number of ways" available to achieve that end.

"We are especially concerned given Treasury has failed to meaningfully consult our members on the potential treaty or legislative action that would be necessary to fully carry out the Pillar One agreement. the senators wrote. "In particular, the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, which has jurisdiction over treaty matters, has received no engagement from Treasury on this issue to date."

The lawmakers concluded: "The lack of consultation, in addition to these latest statements calls into question how serious Treasury is in achieving bipartisan consensus on any Pillar One agreement. Further, Treasury’s continued use of the negotiations to advance the Administration’s tax agenda on Pillar Two, at the expense of ceding substantial U.S. taxing rights to a global rulemaking body without seeking constitutionally mandated approval, puts the durability of any agreement at significant risk."

Using the World Economic Forum and United Nations language of "building back better," repeated by heads of state worldwide over the last year, Biden said Friday the agreement "is proof that the rest of the world agrees that corporations can and should do more to ensure that we build back better."

Yellen said the "global minimum tax would end the race-to-the-bottom in corporate taxation, and ensure fairness for the middle class and working people in the U.S. and around the world."

"The fairer system will mean the UK will raise more tax revenue from large multinationals and help pay for public services here in the UK," the U.K. Treasury declared.

In a joint statement on Friday, Senate Finance Committee ranking member Sen. Mike Crapo (R-Idaho) and House Committee on Ways and Means ranking member Rep. Kevin Brady (R-Texas) lambasted the Biden administration.

"Rather than securing an agreement that would provide certainty and immediately eliminate digital services taxes, the Administration has instead used this global forum to advance its short-sighted domestic tax agenda," they said. "By doing so, the Biden Administration is putting politics over progress and surrendering the fate of the U.S. economy to our foreign competitors."

Claiming the tax would put "America at a serious disadvantage" and make it "better to be a foreign company or worker than an American one," the lawmakers said, "As other countries delay implementation and secure side agreements and carveouts to protect their own companies, U.S. businesses will be hit by tax increases ultimately borne by American workers, savers and consumers."

The OECD plan would make American companies "less competitive, ultimately resulting in fewer jobs, growth, and U.S. investment," they maintain.

The multicountry deal was reached on Friday after India, Ireland, Estonia, and Hungary dropped their opposition. Kenya, Nigeria, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka remain opposed.

The tax would impact 90% of the global economy, OECD estimates, with the minimum 15% tax rate bringing countries an additional $150 billion in new revenue annually. It remains unclear how the global tax would be enforced.

After the G7 meeting on Saturday, a G20 finance committee is expected to formally endorse the global tax at a meeting in Washington, D.C., on Oct. 13. Then leaders meeting at a G20 summit in Rome at the end of October are expected to seal the deal. All agreeing countries worldwide would then be required to pass legislation to comply.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: crapo; janetyellen; risch; toomey
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last
To: cdcdawg
All the RINOs deplored the Birchers in the same way they deplore President Trump. Some things never change.

John Morrison Birch, the first casualty of the Cold War, killed by the ChiComs 1945.

41 posted on 10/12/2021 1:24:51 PM PDT by Governor Dinwiddie (LORD, grant thy people grace to withstand the temptations of the world, the flesh, and the devil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Governor Dinwiddie

Bah! Eisenhower was a communist? It wasn’t just Rino’s who had no use for that talk.


42 posted on 10/12/2021 1:28:46 PM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
This actually would be a rather tricky constitutional issue. The Constitution says that all bills for the raising of revenue must be initiated in the House of Representatives. I don't believe it would be constitutional to raise taxes via a treaty that is ratified only by the Senate.

I think the way you would have to do it is with implementing legislation, which would mean a normal legislative bill initiated in the House, passed by the Senate, and signed by the President.

43 posted on 10/12/2021 1:31:10 PM PDT by Bruce Campbells Chin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Brandon laughs at the Supreme Court.


44 posted on 10/12/2021 1:38:03 PM PDT by wardamneagle (c)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
The global tax is necessary to respond to an "increasingly globalized and digital global economy,"...

The global tax is UNNECESSARY. If the 136 countries want to compete, then let them work it out. What kind of foolishness requires a global tax?

45 posted on 10/12/2021 1:50:27 PM PDT by olezip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bruce Campbells Chin

Treaties are kind of on the same level as the Constitution, so it can be done by treaty.


46 posted on 10/12/2021 1:54:15 PM PDT by Half_Retired
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

If corporations are dodging taxes by moving to Bermuda or Ireland, I don’t see that as a liberal-conservative issue. They should pay taxes where they operate.


47 posted on 10/12/2021 1:56:31 PM PDT by Half_Retired
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

The reason why Democrats are lawless and ignore the Constitution stems from the fact that the Democrats have no respect for, or fear of, the gutless Republicans. The GOP is a door mat that the Dems step on everyday.

Decades of GOP weakness and appeasement allowed the Dems to become lawless bullies. If we had a real party that retaliated against the Dems they wouldn’t be so aggressive.


48 posted on 10/12/2021 2:02:19 PM PDT by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel

“TAXATION WITHOUT REPRESENTATION!”

From the article, “Yellen told ABC News on Sunday that the global tax could be added to the $3.5 trillion budget reconciliation bill currently before Congress.” If Congress approves the legislation containing the tax, then your elected representatives have imposed a tax acting on your behalf. Congress critters are the people’s representatives.


49 posted on 10/12/2021 2:16:15 PM PDT by Soul of the South (The past is gone and cannot be changed. Tomorrow can be a better day if we work on it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Facist Joe Biden.


50 posted on 10/12/2021 2:17:52 PM PDT by Yulee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Iirc, taxing authority lies solely in congress.


51 posted on 10/12/2021 2:23:04 PM PDT by xzins (Retired US Army chaplain. Support our troops by praying for their victory. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

A Voluntary Tax that only the US will pay ?


52 posted on 10/12/2021 2:27:11 PM PDT by butlerweave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
Classic GOP senators fear but will do nothing about it.
53 posted on 10/12/2021 2:33:51 PM PDT by pfflier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel
Congress can pass a tax bill that meets the requirements of the global tax without the tax being enforceable under international law.

It's all a matter of semantics. The U.S. corporate tax rate is already much higher than the minimum established in this agreement.

54 posted on 10/12/2021 2:40:38 PM PDT by Alberta's Child ("All lies and jest, ‘til a man hears what he wants to hear and disregards the rest.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Would Senators be one group with standing to challenge this, as it intrudes on Senatorial power?


55 posted on 10/12/2021 2:52:29 PM PDT by PghBaldy (12/14 - 930am -rampage begins... 12/15 - 1030am - Obama's advance team scouts photo-op locations.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rurudyne

A Federal Constitution with federalism.


56 posted on 10/12/2021 2:54:08 PM PDT by Jacquerie (ArticleVBlog.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas

sheep’s clothing...


57 posted on 10/12/2021 3:02:46 PM PDT by Chode (there is no fall back position, there's no rally point, there is no LZ... we're on our own. P144:1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Half_Retired
Treaties aren't in the same level as the Constitution - they are on the same level as laws. You couldn't ratify a treaty that eliminated freedom of religion, for example.

Not at all sure you can evade the explicit constitutional requirement for revenue raising via treaty.

58 posted on 10/12/2021 3:08:25 PM PDT by Bruce Campbells Chin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie

The 10th Amendment needs to be obeyed.


59 posted on 10/12/2021 3:12:04 PM PDT by Rurudyne (Standup Philosopher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg
Never survive the court challenges.

I agree. I bet even Amazon and Farcebook would go to court to avoid paying.

60 posted on 10/12/2021 3:22:30 PM PDT by T Ruth (Mohammedanism shall be destroyed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson