Posted on 07/31/2021 5:39:00 AM PDT by conservative98
Dr. Rochelle Walensky, director of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, issued a clarification statement Friday night after claiming on Fox News’ "Special Report" that the U.S. was "looking into" a possible nationwide vaccine mandate.
It was the latest reversal for the health agency, which has drawn criticism for murky communications regarding the coronavirus and policies and recommendations related to the outbreak.
"To clarify," Walensky wrote on Twitter, "There will be no nationwide mandate. I was referring to mandates by private institutions and portions of the federal government. There will be no federal mandate."
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
I highly doubt she got her position based on her intellect.
Yes we are. For a cold with a .037% of you being infected. Not dying. Just infected.
The medical-pharma-insurance-tech-legal-government-UN complex is massive.
Well, then, I guess we should walk back the plans for the International Crimes Against Humanity trials for the vaccine pushers....
;-)
I’ve always just considered these sorts of comments (e.g. considering national mandates) as “testing the waters”.
If we don’t push back, we may see it. But apparently enough of us pushed back. And that is what we need to do - let them know that if they do it there will be hell to pay.
Of course not. She was chosen because she’s a loyal apparatchik and female.
Bingo!
“But apparently enough of us pushed back.”
Pubic school boards are now experiencing push-back over CRT. And they don’t like it.
(That’s not a typo.)
So, when a vast majority of companies require the vaccines for employment, in essence we’ll have a mandate.
As it becomes more obvious that the vaccines are not as effective as they were made out to be, and have their own risks associated with them, I would say any employer that mandates these things is likely to be facing massive lawsuits well into the future over this.
“ There will be no nationwide mandate. I was referring to mandates by private institutions and portions of the federal government.”
_________
Fascists.
I spent two years in Mercer Island schools (my 7th and part of 8th grade). It is a very affluent community and the public schools were of such high quality that they might as well have been exclusive private schools. I did VERY well.
Then we moved to Kent schools (1968) and I was a full year ahead of the rest of the students. And the teachers were “mostly” awful, though I had a couple of good ones. But I completely lost interest in school and barely graduated from high school.
One comical one was my civics teacher (Civics was required to graduate) was going to flunk me in my senior year - even though I was doing B+ work - because I played hooky an average of 13 days per quarter.
Personally, my take on public schools is as follows:
Public schools are a 19th century paradigm that outlived its purpose in the early 21st century. Its primary function today is threefold:
1. Politically and socially indoctrinate the masses.
2. Provide employment to overeducated graduates of a bloated college system
3. Provide free daycare to parents who have sold themselves into indentured slavery.
Yet...
There will be no mandate, YET.
There, finished it.
No Vacci-Nazi trials? Awww, what a disappointment!
Idiots like Rochelle are going to get people killed , no slaughtered
For a narrative of why this is not a vaccine, the gain of function crowd’s stated objective, and medical facts about masks and social distancing, described as informative and “likely the most unvarnished truth that gets posted to these threads,” see reply 9 on this FR post.
bump
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.