Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Justice Dept.: Missouri governor can't void federal gun laws
AP via SF Gate ^ | 06 17 2021 | MICHAEL BALSAMO

Posted on 06/17/2021 12:38:31 PM PDT by yesthatjallen

The Justice Department is warning Missouri officials that the state can’t ignore federal law, after the governor signed a bill last week that bans police from enforcing federal gun rules.

In a letter sent Wednesday night and obtained by The Associated Press, Justice officials said the U.S. Constitution's Supremacy Clause outweighs the measure that Gov. Mike Parson signed into law Saturday. The new rules penalize local police departments if their officers enforce federal gun laws.

SNIP

President Joe Biden has made gun control laws a priority of his administration, and the House has passed two bills requiring background checks on firearms sales and an expanded review for gun purchases, though they face a tough road in the Senate. But states, including Missouri, have increasingly worked to loosen gun laws, including abandoning requirements that people get training and pass background checks to carry concealed handguns.

Missouri’s law would subject law enforcement agencies with officers who knowingly enforce any federal laws to a fine of about $50,000 per violating officer.

(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: banglist; doj; federal; gunlaws; justice; merrickgarland; missouri
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 next last

1 posted on 06/17/2021 12:38:31 PM PDT by yesthatjallen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

The lines are being drawn. Who is going to blink first?


2 posted on 06/17/2021 12:40:00 PM PDT by Magnum44 (...against all enemies, foreign and domestic...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

Uhh what about immigration and marajuana laws??


3 posted on 06/17/2021 12:40:00 PM PDT by Husker24 (Pp)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

Sounds like upcoming fun.

The Feds don’t enforce their own immigration laws.


4 posted on 06/17/2021 12:40:09 PM PDT by Paladin2 (Critical Marx Theory is The SOLUTION....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

Really?

Where were these clowns when states and municipalities were “voiding” immigration laws?


5 posted on 06/17/2021 12:40:34 PM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion, or satire. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

It’s a start...
Even if symbolic...


6 posted on 06/17/2021 12:40:34 PM PDT by SuperLuminal (Where is another Sam Adams now that we desperately need him?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Husker24

> Uhh what about immigration and marajuana laws??

No, it’s fine to have “sanctuary” locales for those, because they support the DESTRUCTION of the U.S.


7 posted on 06/17/2021 12:40:56 PM PDT by Westbrook
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

What about all these places which have declared themselves “sanctuary cities” and refuse to enforce federal immigration laws?

If the issue is federal law vs. state/local laws on a certain subject, why is it ok to refuse to enforce federal immigration law, but not ok to refuse to enforce federal gun laws?


8 posted on 06/17/2021 12:40:58 PM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

Garland stepped into the trap. Now he has to answer for ignoring the sanctuary cities and states that brag about ignoring federal law.


9 posted on 06/17/2021 12:41:24 PM PDT by jmaroneps37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

haven’t numerous governors and mayors voided federal immigration laws with absolutely no penalty or even a peep from the so-called Dept of Justice?


10 posted on 06/17/2021 12:41:58 PM PDT by euram
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

KMA Democrats!!!


11 posted on 06/17/2021 12:42:26 PM PDT by MercyFlush (A wise man once said nothing. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

I think he just did. 😆


12 posted on 06/17/2021 12:42:28 PM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmaroneps37

This goes right to the top court immediately.


13 posted on 06/17/2021 12:43:02 PM PDT by frogjerk (I will not do business with fascists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

Void no, ignore yes.

Enforce what you can ATF, and see what sticks.

5.56mm


14 posted on 06/17/2021 12:43:02 PM PDT by M Kehoe (Quid Pro Joe and the Ho need to go.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

“Missouri governor can’t void federal gun laws”

Since the Constitution is the supreme law of the land, yes he can.


15 posted on 06/17/2021 12:43:19 PM PDT by ScottfromNJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen
But states, including Missouri, have increasingly worked to loosen gun laws

No, it's a preventative measure for any new fedgov gun laws. MO gun laws are currently the same as fedgov.

16 posted on 06/17/2021 12:45:54 PM PDT by Pollard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
Where were these clowns when states and municipalities were “voiding” immigration laws?

Bingo!

17 posted on 06/17/2021 12:46:08 PM PDT by FatherofFive (We support Trump. Not the GOP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ScottfromNJ

Cities, counties & states have voided constitutional federal immigration laws for the last 20+ years so why not unconstitutional federal gun laws?


18 posted on 06/17/2021 12:46:47 PM PDT by Reily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

That horse is already out of the barn. States and cities have unilaterally exempted themselves from Fed laws for years.

In the case of firearms laws, the Feds are trying to ignore the 2nd Amendment, in which case the states can play hard ball in response.


19 posted on 06/17/2021 12:48:20 PM PDT by lurk ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Magnum44
"The lines are being drawn. Who is going to blink first?"

We've been down this road before. THIS time the Constitution is clear on the subject. We can't own people but we CAN own guns.

20 posted on 06/17/2021 12:48:49 PM PDT by Psalm 73 ("You'll never hear surf music again" - J. Hendrix)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson