Skip to comments.
Granholm launches 'Earthshot' goal of reducing hydrogen energy cost to $1
TheHill ^
| 06/07/2021
| Rachel Frazin
Posted on 06/07/2021 10:17:10 AM PDT by ChicagoConservative27
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 next last
Another demented idea.
To: ChicagoConservative27
Oh The Humanity!
2
posted on
06/07/2021 10:21:03 AM PDT
by
left that other site
(If you do not stand firm in your faith, you will not stand at all. (Isaiah 7:9))
To: left that other site
3
posted on
06/07/2021 10:23:28 AM PDT
by
shanover
(...To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them.-S.Adams)
To: ChicagoConservative27
It costs more than that to pressurize it and store it.
She’s just stupid.
4
posted on
06/07/2021 10:24:21 AM PDT
by
Mariner
(War Criminal #18)
To: ChicagoConservative27
“The Energy Earthshots are an all-hands-on-deck call for innovation, collaboration and acceleration of our clean energy economy by tackling the toughest remaining barriers to quickly deploy emerging clean energy technologies at scale,” “
these morons think that if they string together enough buzzwords, snap their fingers and carpet bomb with billions, that the laws of physics are just “remaining barriers” to be “tackled” ...
5
posted on
06/07/2021 10:27:33 AM PDT
by
catnipman
(Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!)
To: ChicagoConservative27
I can top that. The sun is mostly hydrogen. We can just go there and get all the hydrogen we can carry and bring it back. There’s enough there for centuries of free hydrogen!
6
posted on
06/07/2021 10:28:14 AM PDT
by
BipolarBob
(I wish I was 14 again so I could ruin my life in a completely different way. I've got ideas.)
To: ChicagoConservative27
In 1971 - fifty years ago - an environmental professor told his class windmills should be used to generate hydrogen that could then be piped, or otherwise collected, for use.
Seemed far fetched to those that heard it at the time. It would address the problem of storing wind energy for later use, but at what cost?
To: ChicagoConservative27
The Energy Earthshots are an all-hands-on-deck call for innovation, collaboration and acceleration of our clean energy economy by tackling the toughest remaining barriers to quickly deploy emerging clean energy technologies at scale,” Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm said in a statement.The Energy Earthshots are an all-hands-on-deck call for innovation, collaboration and acceleration of our clean energy economy by taking money from the middle class to pay for attempting to create our idea of a communist utopia.
8
posted on
06/07/2021 10:29:03 AM PDT
by
Pollard
To: ChicagoConservative27
The oceans are full of hydrogen......................
9
posted on
06/07/2021 10:33:04 AM PDT
by
Red Badger
(Jesus said there is no marriage in Heaven. That's why they call it Heaven.....................)
To: Mariner
First they need to figure out a way to even store it. Given that hydrogen escapes everything. Lol.
10
posted on
06/07/2021 10:33:51 AM PDT
by
Seruzawa
(The political Left is the Garden of Eden of Incompetence - Marx the Smarter (Groucho))
To: Mariner
Not to mention the fact that it’s relatively low on BTUs, unless burned in pure oxygen.
11
posted on
06/07/2021 10:36:35 AM PDT
by
LIConFem
(Don't drain the swamp. Just fill it with hungry gat)
To: BipolarBob
The sun is mostly hydrogen. We can just go there and get all the hydrogen we can carry and bring it back. She can just go there....
Soon.
I suffered every day of her being governor of Michigan and I don't owe it to anybody to suffer with Whitmer or with the Pelosi House since 2018, the scams by Barr and Durham, or the stolen election since November. All of you bums get off my lawn.
12
posted on
06/07/2021 10:38:49 AM PDT
by
frank ballenger
(You have summoned up a thundercloud. You're gonna hear from me. Anthem by Leonard Cohen)
To: ChicagoConservative27
The biggest problem with H2 is leaks!
The molecule is so small, leaks are common, hard to find and maintain.
Probably not something you want in an car with all the vibration.
13
posted on
06/07/2021 10:40:41 AM PDT
by
Zathras
To: ChicagoConservative27
I’ll take hydrogen embrittlement for $100 please.
To: ChicagoConservative27
Gonna take a lot more coal plants to get hydrogen that cheap. We can do it!!!
To: ChicagoConservative27
—and most of the commentary after the article displays just how ignorance is extremely widespread—
16
posted on
06/07/2021 10:55:38 AM PDT
by
rellimpank
(--don't believe anything the media or government says about firearms or explosives--)
To: left that other site
"The Energy Earthshots Initiative will seek to, within a decade, speed up breakthroughs in affordable and reliable clean energy"
Define "affordable".
To: ChicagoConservative27
Is there some way of making a compound with hydrogen and carbon, that would have high energy density, be safe to store and transport and economical? I know if sounds far fetched, but it might be worth considering.
When my great-grandkids ask me what we did for lighting before candles, I can say “electricity”.
To: ChicagoConservative27
Everybody knows that they do not make a seal that can completely contain hydrogen, right?
19
posted on
06/07/2021 11:01:48 AM PDT
by
D Rider
( )
To: ChicagoConservative27
the DOE, that hasn’t produced one single unit of energy since it’s inception...
20
posted on
06/07/2021 11:04:30 AM PDT
by
Chode
(there is no fall back position, there's no rally point, there is no LZ... we're on our own. P144:1)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson