but there will still be an $XXX clerical handling fee to process the paperwork for your "FREE" license to exercise the right you were given by God...
Posted on 04/12/2021 9:08:03 AM PDT by skimbell
...The USSC also found, "A State may not impose a charge for the enjoyment of a right granted by the Federal Constitution." This means the entire Bill of Rights...
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
This might encourage some States to go with Constitutional Carry.
Possible push States that have considered it before at least.
The slippery slope of gay marriage - that ‘moderate Republicans promised was a fallacy - turns out to be slipperier than initially feared.
Everything is up to the states from now on. Who gives a crap what the supreme kangaroo court says.
REPARATIONS!
Did they really say this? Because the 'Federal Constitution' does not 'grant' anything.
Yeah, do go showing off and reading cursive or anything. That’d be for white peoples.
Filthynois...license (FOID) needed to purchase, possess or even handle firearms and ammunition. Needed BEFORE even applying for concealed carry!
Just give him time. He will find a way to bow to his handlers whoever they are.
So the lic to own a machine gun is gone
If the SCOTUS does not protect the olbillorights then, we have to do it with our guns or die trying.
Hell yeah, the tyrants want our guns!
It becomes us or them.
That is war.
but there will still be an $XXX clerical handling fee to process the paperwork for your "FREE" license to exercise the right you were given by God...
I noticed the “grant” issue as well, but in reading the article I believe that the author used “grant” in the context of the SC was “in agreement with”.
Could be wrong but the author also refers to “...this fundamental right guaranteed by the constitution...”
Any word yet on if Amendments to the US Constitution is really suggestions that can be abolished by Executive Order?
>>Easy. He’ll call it a “tax.”<<
I just read the article (I going weird sometimes). The ruling specifically is based on taxes.
It is just unexpected SCOTUS should rule pro-freedom with that turncoat commie Roberts at the helm.
>>Like a poll tax?<<
Read the article. Poll tax is specifically referenced.
>>The Federal Constitution DOES NOT GRANT RIGHTS, IT GUARANTEES THE RIGHTS GIVEN TO MAN BY GOD.<<
It instantiates a specific set of rights and uses God as the framework.
There is no legal construct of “natural rights.” That is up there with “driving” vs. “travelling.”
Hi.
I gotta idea. Charge Nanzi Pelosi for every word she speaks and writes.
5.56mm
Yup, the thieving bastards get us twice that way. I had to pay for both.
BTW I am so stealing Filthynois. Gawd that’s great!
LMAO!
The lower court struck down the entire 1934 National Firearms act as unconstitutional.
Generally, the federal government. courts included, is hostile to the right to keep and bear arms. It is treated as a privilege to be regulated and denied with slim justification.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.