"You just want to be left alone, but I won't leave you alone!"
Posted on 04/03/2021 4:43:29 AM PDT by Kaslin
By cancel culture, I mean the idea that people have rights and responsibilities and obligations and entitlements based on their skin color or their ethnic origin. A person’s identity is defined by the group they belong to. There are no individual rights. There are only group rights.
The cancel culture rejects the political view encapsulated in the Declaration of Independence. In particular, it rejects the idea that people have a right to pursue their own happiness. It also rejects the idea of basic rights guaranteed in the Constitution, including freedom of speech, freedom of religion and freedom of assembly.
Offensive speech can be seen as a “micro aggression” – and thus a form of force. There are no limits to what constitutes such aggression. For example, if you say you voted for Donald Trump, or you like capitalism, or you think free markets have lifted people out of poverty all over the world, you might be accused of offensive speech.
The cancel culture believes in persecuting people who have offensive ideas – by getting them fired, by silencing their writings and their speech, by silencing their access to the Internet and through social ostracism.
When you try to make a reasonable argument against any of this, you make the mistake of thinking reason is the arbiter. It isn’t. The cancel culture rejects the role the modern world has assigned to reason, logic and the scientific method. It sees the Age of Reason, The Enlightenment and indeed all of western civilization as enemies – rather than the path to the good life and the good society.
How did these ideas become so dominant, so quickly?
The answer: the world of ideas abhors a vacuum. What we might call “20th century liberalism” has been intellectually dead since the end of the Vietnam War. What we might call “20th century conservatism” has been dead for at least two decades. The cancel culture swept in and occupied the space that was otherwise abandoned.
Throughout most of the last century, the dominant intellectual viewpoint was called liberalism. It was the political philosophy that gave us the modern welfare state. But by the mid-1970s, liberals had run out of any useful ideas on how to solve economic problems. For the next 25 years, the political winds all over the world were anti-communist and anti-socialist. With leadership from Ronald Reagan and Margaret Thatcher, all the interesting ideas were suddenly coming from the right.
The flat tax, private social security accounts, school choice, deregulation, privatization – these solutions were debated everywhere and enacted to one degree or another in many countries.
The left generally opposed this trend. But they had few alternatives to offer. So, the arguments almost everywhere were over policy ideas coming from the right.
The liberal approach to economic problems was almost always more government – more regulation, more spending, more control. But in the area of civil liberties, 20th-century liberals kept faith with 19th-century classical liberalism. They believed government should be held at bay and staunchly defended the right of people to speak, write and demonstrate on almost any topic.
The problem is: the argument for government intervention in the economy can be used with equal force in the world of ideas. Trade between two people, liberals used to argue, might make both traders better off. But there can be negative “external effects” for others and that justifies a role for government. Unfortunately, the same can be said of speech. Indeed, some speech is designed to upset others and make them feel uncomfortable. Does that mean government should intervene? By the time this argument was made, liberalism was so intellectually bankrupt that it produced almost no resistance.
What about conservatism? When Bill Buckley established National Review in 1955, he announced that “It stands athwart history, yelling Stop.” Small wonder, then, that such ideas as the flat tax, Social Security privatization and school choice did not originate on the pages of his magazine. Buckley’s conservatism was not about reform, it was about stopping reform.
Where did the free enterprise reform ideas of the last quarter of the 20th-century come from? They mainly came from Milton Friedman, who called himself a “liberal,” meaning a 19th--century classical liberal. Just as the classical liberals were reformers, so was Friedman. And while the National Review crowd welcomed these ideas, it only weakly supported the idea of a free market and never made a moral case for it.
What about free speech and First Amendment rights? It may be an uncomfortable memory, but the conservatives of the 1950s had their own cancel culture. Buckley, for example, wrote a book defending Joe McCarthy. He seemed to approve of hauling people before congressional committees and asking them about their political beliefs. He didn’t seem to mind very much when they lost their jobs because of their politics. As for the First Amendment, some conservatives questioned whether it really belonged in the Constitution. (See the essay by Willmoore Kendall in What Is Conservatism?) National Review writers also advocated outlawing movies judged to be pornographic.
Milton Friedman was a libertarian. He believed in “free minds and free markets.” But as an intellectual force, this point of view attracts a very small percentage of the electorate. As we entered the 21st century, people who called themselves “conservative” became increasingly focused on the culture wars – taking positions that had little appeal to young people. As I wrote recently at National Review, they showed little interest in free market reforms that would be most beneficial to those at the bottom of the income ladder.
Liberals progressively abandoned virtually everything they once believed about civil liberties and about race relations as well. Very few of them today would agree with Martin Luther King’s idea that people should “not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character."
Into the vacuum stepped a cancel culture that is collectivist, racist, anti-capitalist and unapologetically irrational. It is dominating, because it has no real opposition.
Research: Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Criteria
Coordinated Oligarchy.
It started when the damn fool who was mouthing off to somebody, live, in person, and within range, did not get their nose punched, with a loud ‘shut up’ added.
"You just want to be left alone, but I won't leave you alone!"
My husband always says this.
I hope that when they start doing personal ESG scores, mine is as close to zero as possible.
Let’s see.
I don’t recycle. Check
I drive a pickup. Check
My lawn tools are gas. Check
Environment-Zero
(Actually I’m a strong conservationist so hopefully using God’s resources wisely gets me negative points.
Social
I’m a God-fearing born again evangelical Christian. Check
I’m pro-life under all circumstances. Check
I’m against legalizing drugs. Check
Government
Conservative. Check
Almost 20 year FReeper. Check
Not a member but support the Proud Boys and Oath Keepers. Check
Wear a Trump hat. Check
Attended January 6 protest. Check
Own firearms. Check
Believe in the Constitution as written. Check
Looks like I qualify. ESG Score -25
Why do so many morons vote Bolshekratic?
For the same reason we saw so many FREEPERS (of all people) hell-bent on shutting down their lives -- and even having the audacity to scold others here on FR for refusing to shut down own own lives -- when the COVID-19 fiasco began more than a year ago: Because people are morons and easily prone to latch onto any media-driven hysteria.
The UniParty.
Take the border debacle.......migrants pouring in, kids living in filth, held in cages, parents nowhere to be found.
Biden is seen on tape telling them all to "come....we'll take you in."
Yet, Biden has yet to visit the mess he made and neither has his VP.....predictably Biden blames the problem on Trump.
Because metaphorically it is easier to destroy than it is to create and build.
Several years back some politician referred to the escalating violence in the world by usually middle eastern persons saying “they use technology they cannot create to destroy things they cannot build”.
Leftists are like that ...
because people want to be polite. and they are scared when someone says “that’s racist!” to say STHU.
Or “so what?”
You just want to be left alone, but I won’t leave you alone!”
There’s a cure for that. 👊
It’s a set of college courses. Critical __________ Theory
The people liked Howard Beale. :)
Not exactly. The globalist “free market” liberaltarians elbowed out all the traditional Republicans from leadership because taking over the party apparatus is doable for a small committed contingent of zealots. These guys out-sourced like there was no tomorrow and they dragged the country into their utopian “citizen of the world” idealism. The country rebelled and Trump was elected.
Liberaltarians are Left. The Left took over the Democrats, and the Left libertarian-Republicans took over the Republicans. We’ve had a choice of Left or Left. Thats what happened. If the Left Democrats ala Clinton feed China all kinds of American jobs and tech the only redress the public had was to vote for Left Republicans ala Bushies, which will feed China more American jobs and tech. The globalist Left agenda continues to be pushed forward, uninterrupted. This author is part of the problem. You aren’t going to find solutions with “free market” reforms as long as there are communists in the world because I’m pretty sure the Soviet Communists are the architects of this trap.
Christians stopped being salt and light and hid their light under a bushel.
“He didn’t seem to mind very much when they lost their jobs because of their politics.”
I have no problem eliminating communists from our government. They have been the enemy my entire life. McCarthy was right.
What I see are people going about their business, making a living, raising families and getting ahead in life. And not paying the snobs and elites any attention at all.
A lot of this stuff is the purview of the urban centers and government, education and business elites and their propensity to be in the limelight all of the time.
Regular folks don't even know what cancel culture is or recognize it because it doesn't exist in most of the country. Just in the eyes of those who want it to be so.
Without reading about it on FR, I wouldn't know anything about it. And still don't.
Contrary to what the media tells us, most people just aren't interested in these cultural abnormalities.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.