Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Global Bodies Went Off the Rails When They Scrapped Ozone, Targeted Carbon Dioxide
Americanthinker.com ^ | 3/2/2021 | Brian Tomlinson

Posted on 03/02/2021 10:41:19 AM PST by rktman

Some of us old timers who grew up in Southern California recall the inversion layers of particles in the valleys that trapped smog.

We later learned that the haze we saw (which was then called 'smog') was ozone, created primarily from vehicle emissions. That was “bad” ozone. There also was naturally occurring (good) ozone, generated by the sun’s reactions with naturally emitted hydrocarbons (e.g. pine trees) that one sees over the Great Smoky Mountains. Ozone is important, since its layer in the stratosphere protects us from intense UV radiation that is associated with skin cancer. So, years ago, the world’s leaders got together to stop the degradation of the ozone layer by ending use of ozone-depleting chemicals. I wrote about that at American Thinker last October, in an article titled, “What’s the Endgame with Ozone.”

What I want to do now, is show that it's still the ozone-depleting chemicals, rather than the now-vaunted carbon dioxide, as what's most critical to what happens with climate.

Once upon a time, the global bodies had been on the right track.

On Sept. 16, 1987, 46 countries signed the Montreal Protocol to stop using ozone-depleting chemicals (ODCs). There are 200 countries that have eventually endorsed the Montreal Protocol. Developed countries were to lead the effort to roll back ODCs while developing countries were allowed a more relaxed period to stop their use. I believe that the Montreal Protocol was a trial balloon for the Kyoto Protocol, which was all about carbon dioxide emissions.

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: dumbassery
Sometimes science is right, sometimes science is wrong.
1 posted on 03/02/2021 10:41:19 AM PST by rktman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: rktman

Like Sloe Joe’s undergarments: depends.


2 posted on 03/02/2021 10:44:38 AM PST by lightman (I am a binary Trinitarian. Deal with it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lightman

Or ‘grampers’.


3 posted on 03/02/2021 10:48:08 AM PST by rktman (Destroy America from within? Check! WTH? Enlisted USN 1967 to end up with this?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rktman

I do not accept the premise that anything is “happening” with climate. Not with ozone. Not with CO2. Nature is nature and the sun is the sun, and we are bystanders.


4 posted on 03/02/2021 10:55:44 AM PST by ClearCase_guy ("I see you did something -- why you so racist?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

We are but mere specks in the grand scheme of things.


5 posted on 03/02/2021 11:15:05 AM PST by LastDayz (A blunt and brazen Texan. I will not be assimilated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy
We're bystanders with respect to being able to influence what happens in natural cycles. The grand solar minimum that we are entering is going to trash our ability to grow sufficient food. If we don't adapt, nature will deal with the excess population through famine.
6 posted on 03/02/2021 11:15:55 AM PST by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Myrddin

Sounds like greenhouses are going to make a strong comeback.


7 posted on 03/02/2021 11:17:39 AM PST by LastDayz (A blunt and brazen Texan. I will not be assimilated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: LastDayz

Yup. In 2525(?) muvver erf will shake our presence off like dead fleas.


8 posted on 03/02/2021 11:19:39 AM PST by rktman (Destroy America from within? Check! WTH? Enlisted USN 1967 to end up with this?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: rktman

“The Paris agreement a.k.a., the Paris accord is a legally binding international treaty on climate change. “

That sentence lowers my opinion of the author. Which of the three is it? Why not use the most accurate name throughout the article.

Also, carbon dioxide affects the earth’s temperature. Ozone is a gas that stops harmful ultraviolet rays from reaching the earth. Ozone is does not affect the earth’s temperature.

I’m done with that article.


9 posted on 03/02/2021 11:20:22 AM PST by cymbeline
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cymbeline

😂🙌🔬 but, science. Disclaimer: no science was injured while producing this article.


10 posted on 03/02/2021 11:22:52 AM PST by rktman (Destroy America from within? Check! WTH? Enlisted USN 1967 to end up with this?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: rktman

—as an aside to this—

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2021/02/25/nasa-vegetation-index-globe-continues-rapid-greening-trend-sahara-alone-shrinks-700000-sq-km/


11 posted on 03/02/2021 11:52:38 AM PST by rellimpank (--don't believe anything the media or government says about firearms or explosives--)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rellimpank

Funny thing:

https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3938908/posts


12 posted on 03/02/2021 11:58:43 AM PST by rktman (Destroy America from within? Check! WTH? Enlisted USN 1967 to end up with this?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: rktman
We later learned that the haze we saw (which was then called 'smog') was ozone, created primarily from vehicle emissions

And "Science" swore Up and Down through the 60's and 70's that this smog was causing a Terrible Ice Age. We were ALL Going to FREEZE to Death. In the early 1980's they came out with catalytic converters and fuel injection for cars, and the air cleaned u up real fast and remains clear today, as soon as the air became clear and breathable again they told us and still are telling us that we are causing Global Warming and the only answer is to go back to the Stone Age way of life. Basically a life of Serfdom with the Masters ruling over society.
13 posted on 03/02/2021 12:09:54 PM PST by eyeamok (founded in cynicism, wrapped in sarcasm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

[[I do not accept the premise that anything is “happening” with climate.

we are bystanders.]]

Exactly! The climate started off mild, then turned nastily cold all on it’s own- we had miles thick ice covering continents, then the climate changed again all on it’s own, and those miles of ice melted, thank goodness- and we’ve been really very steady ever since- some winters are bad, some are mild- just the way we like it- let’s hope the climate doesn’t change all on it’s own again and drop us into another deep freeze-

our man produced 0.00136% CO2 in the atmosphere is NOT going to change the climate-


14 posted on 03/02/2021 12:41:32 PM PST by Bob434
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: eyeamok

and the only answer is to ... do away with fuel injection and catalytic converters- which clearly were a mistake


15 posted on 03/02/2021 12:43:21 PM PST by Bob434
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: cymbeline

CO2 affects the climate about the same way a single tiny ant affects the undermining of the empire state building’s foundation


16 posted on 03/02/2021 12:45:54 PM PST by Bob434
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: cymbeline

The densest gasses that envelope the Earth are at the surface. earth’s atmosphere keeps getting thinner as altitude increases. If a gas could be an insulator, the best way to test it would be in your back yard, not pretending that ozone or CO2 can hold heat within the atmosphere. It can’t!


17 posted on 03/02/2021 12:59:10 PM PST by gr8eman (Elder Non-Binary Sibling is Watching You!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: rktman

“On Sept. 16, 1987, 46 countries signed the Montreal Protocol to stop using ozone-depleting chemicals (ODCs).”

Speaking of ODC’s. Does anyone know which classification of ODC’s wreak the most damage on the ozone layer? Hint..... it’s not CFC’s.


18 posted on 03/02/2021 3:34:16 PM PST by LastDayz (A blunt and brazen Texan. I will not be assimilated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

“Yup. In 2525(?) muvver erf will shake our presence off like dead fleas.”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=izQB2-Kmiic


19 posted on 03/02/2021 3:37:28 PM PST by LastDayz (A blunt and brazen Texan. I will not be assimilated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson