Posted on 01/27/2021 10:27:47 AM PST by Responsibility2nd
The reason why is that now they personally are scared of and feel threatened by half the country calling BS on their entire scam. Government worker hypocrites.
They don't give a rat's behind about you and me. They proved that by letting Antifa and BLM riot.
I’m not here to “infect” people with my politics as you suggested. I joined FR many years ago, because it was a place that I thought I could speak my mind without being attacked, or have my motives questioned for saying the things I said. I thought this was still a free country, at least until the Nazis fully take over. Unfortunately, it seems the Nazis are alive and well on FR now too.
I DO want to infect them!!
‘Specially the ones who’ve not built up an immunity to Conservative principles; or been bought by ‘government’ largess, or seduced by promises of a free lunch in other ways.
Knock yourself out.
It appears that the Biden administration and Congress IS trying to outlaw political opposition.
The terror is squarely from the global socialist left.
Some conservative pacs need to pay to have billboards and adds placed across the country, advertising a reward to anyone who has witnessed, recorded, and otherwise caught DOJ and FBI officials involved in unconstitutional, unlawful, fraudulent, and treasonous activities, and involved in violations of the US Constitution.
Elsie, why did you use the word "infected" in that post? I am hoping you were being sarcastic.
Zeitgeist explains it all.
I want to INFECT and that it be highly contagious; too!
This country has already built up antibodies against feeling sorrow over all of our national sins <Homer_Stokes_voice> "I don't think I have to name them."</Homer_Stokes_voice> ; so only a Pandemic of rePentance; Perpetrated among Panicky, lukewarm Patriots that might Possibly reignite the Private; nearly dead Passion; once felt Publicly.
I hope I've piqued your interest by this hastily penned; purposively prickly reply.
Shorter answer.
If we’ve been here on FR for 23 years; I’d surely hope we have gotten our ‘message’ out to the needy world (think flashmob at a food court) instead of merely having the Bass section of the choir complain about the Sopranos all the time during practice.
what beautiful music...
Yup!
April 19 may be a good date to watch.
Funny they mention the el Paso shooting when in fact the el Paso shooter Crusius [sp?] was both an ecoterrorist and anti-Trump...
El Paso Shooter Promoted Population Control: “Get Rid of Enough People” Planet Will be “Sustainable”
8/5/2019, 7:25:57 PM · by detective · 153 replies
Life News ^ | Aug 5, 201 | Jason Hopkins
Shortened title. Full title: El Paso Shooter Promoted Population Control: “If We Can Get Rid of Enough People” Planet Will be “Sustainable” The man who police say committed the deadly shooting spree in El Paso, Texas, is believed to have published an anti-immigrant manifesto minutes before the attack. Law enforcement officials said they were confident that an anti-immigrant screed posted online belongs to Patrick Wood Crusius, 21, who they said is responsible for Saturday’s mass shooting at a Walmart in El Paso—leaving at least 20 dead and 26 wounded or injured. The nearly 2,400-word manifesto outlines reasons for launching the...
Echo Chamber: NYT, WaPo Print 11 Similar Talking Points on Same Day to Blame Trump for El Paso Terr
Breitbart ^ | 8/9/2019 | aaron klein
Posted on 8/9/2019, 10:40:33 PM by bitt
NEW YORK — In separate articles on the same day, the New York Times and Washington Post each seemingly parroted the same talking points 11 times in respective articles in their zest to baselessly connect President Trump’s rhetoric and policies to an unhinged manifesto attributed to the 21-year-old accused of murdering 22 people in cold blood and injuring dozens when he opened fire in a Walmart in El Paso.
The manifesto is clearly the work of a demented mind and expressed views that are all over the map, yet both newspapers selectively cited the document to divine the El Paso shooter’s alleged motives and link the mass murder to Trump.
Earlier this week, this reporter documented the manifesto attributed to shooting suspect Patrick Wood Crusius actually shows that the author did not have a coherent political viewpoint. While the text contains racist language targeting the Hispanic community, it also evidences hatred toward what the writer labeled “average Americans” and calls for a decrease in the general American population.
Missing from much of the news media coverage is that the manifesto promotes far-left policy prescriptions including universal healthcare and a socialist-style “universal income.” Perhaps the two main themes of the document are actually anti-corporatist and eco-extremist sentiment and the shooter repeatedly labeled both Republicans and Democrats as sellouts to corporations on a host of issues.
Still, two widely cited front-page articles, both published on August 4, were printed by the New York Times and Washington Post respectively in an attempt to link Trump’s rhetoric to the shooting.
The Times’ piece is titled, “El Paso Shooting Suspect’s Manifesto Echoes Trump’s Language.”
The Post’s article is similarly titled, “‘How do you stop these people?’: Trump’s anti-immigrant rhetoric looms over El Paso massacre.”
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
What is interesting is, if the criteria used to designated a Domestic Terrorist is:
White......Male......Conservative.....Gun Owner.....Patriotic
Then that includes a very large portion of DHS. Say what you want about the FBI and other federal law enforcement agencies being what they are, I agree they’re scum, but there are a lot of folks in there that aren’t. If they’re going to start purging the military for this, they may as well do it to themselves.
These idiots sling so much crap against the wall it’s sometimes hard to imagine.
I see what you did there.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.