[CincyRichieRich]

We need to defeat them and keep PDJT, not write useless articles about events that aren’t going to happen. Nancy, we want to a revote. Ok, sure thing!!

[right way right]

Our so-called representatives need to be violently purged and the corruption machine of DC torn down...then we can have a real revote.

[lowbridge]

True. But it aint happening. As long as they have anything to do with it, democrats arent about to let it happen.

[BigEdLB]

Our masters in the house, senate and SCOTUS are taking orders from Beijing, and will never allow it.

[E. Pluribus Unum]

The harm with an honest election is the Democrats won’t win, so they will never agree to it.

[MeneMeneTekelUpharsin]

Agreed.

[ml/nj]

in the states in which such evidence was found

Hey!

I'd like a new, honest, in-person vote with paper ballots in my State too.

ML/NJ

[Lurkinanloomin]

The Big Steal was bipartisan, neither party wants or will allow a re-vote.

They BOTH wanted Trump gone.

[Cen-Tejas]

.............as Jack Nicholson famously said from the witness stand............”you can’t handle the truth”................!!!!

In this case, he would be referring to the UNI Party!

[Wally_Kalbacken]

There is no judicial precedent for it, there is no statutory provision for it. the federal constitutional provisions are clear and well known, but only apply when no candidate has 270 EV.

The only “re-run” of an election I am aware of was a congressional race in North Carolina in 2018 in which the incumbent 1 term Republican had hired a consultant who manipulated absentee ballots illegally, to a degree such that the NC state election commission ordered a special election.

[jigsaw]

Revote or Revolt.

[eeriegeno]

One side would agree to a revote in those states but, unfortunately, the other side would not. That side knows full well that fraud was rampant and that they would lose in an honest revote. The honest side would agree to it but the dishonest side would not. Maybe they will change their minds when CW2 is well underway? Maybe they don’t realize that it is either a revote or a revolt? Maybe!

[mo]

Fed.gov has EVERYTHING to lose in the event of a “re-vote” ...and more importantly...Fed.gov’s Beijing masters won’t permit it

[DannyTN]

I'd support a revote, but you have to stop the nonsense first.

• How long for states to buy new equipment?
• How long to get election laws changed.
• Get some teeth in the laws, some serious penalties for anyone excluding observers.
• Maybe get some Federal leo observing the trouble spots.
• Get cameras on every election office and counting room and ballot storage area.
• Bar codes on every ballot and software modified to count and track them, to prevent duplicates and ensure validity.
• Signature verfication standards with penalties for not adhering to them.
• Voter ID.
• Clean up the voter rolls. In addition to providing names that can be fraudulently voted. Excess names on the registrations provide cover for overvotes making them less obvious.

  Manual totalling process providing a check on machine totals.

  Nobody stays behind when observers leave. Security cameras in place to ensure compliance.

[Texas Hostage in a Blue State]

https://youtu.be/buvSIrFi0Hw

[silent majority rising]

Great idea. Only people who are alive, who are US Citizens and of age should vote.

[Nateman]

We need the Purple finger that Iraq voters had.

[ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas]

Not only did they cheat to drag biden in. Now 10s of millions of legal voters know that yes, in the USA, it’s not the real votes that count. It’s the system that pretends to “count the votes..” Will real voters even bother to vote in the future?

[AFreeBird]

Yea? Tell that to the Commies.

[Gay State Conservative]

impossible...for a million different reasons.What is possible...and is specifically spelled out in the Constitution...is to allow the House of Representatives to vote.Each state will be heard and there won't be a single computer...or water main break...involved.