Posted on 12/15/2020 4:20:23 AM PST by Kaslin
The first time I wore a mask I had trouble breathing. It is also hard for me to understand what people are saying when they talk to me, as it sounds like they are mumbling.
The same thing happens when they wear those shields
Look United doesn’t care, they never did before Covid. I have never had a good experience with United Airlines. I never fly United anymore. In fact I will deliberately pay for any other carrier that will get me there.
Why? Because United doesn’t care.
My daughter was planning a trip to visit family this month with her 2 year old.
She called American Airlines and asked them about their policy. They said kids over 2 should wear a mask, but was told “ we understand it can be difficult. All we ask is that you try to get a mask on the child, and that the parents are masked.”
I guess she will need to get that in writing before she flies.
There seems to be a racial component here and possibly a sexual one too.
My autistic son is 4 years old and they don’t make him wear one all day in preschool. Chester County, Pennsylvania.
The voice muffling is a real issue to me as well.
The author of this piece should get his head on straight and stop assuming that “freedom” means having the right to dictate to someone else how to run their business.
I’ll step up and just say it. Flying aint for everyone. And 2 year olds who cant follow the rules and their parents shouldnt fly commercial. And Im a strong believer who thinks the entire mask thing is b. S. I think afew people shouldnt fly. Like that woman who opens a gatl6ic salad on the plane and starts chowing down, or the perd6on with all their luggage who drags a huge back pack, a carry on and a shoulder bag and proceefs to clog ip the islr, trying to shove all that into thr overhead. .
15 Dec: Conservative Woman UK: Covid testing: We have a right to the facts on PCR
by Richard Tice
(Richard Tice is chairman of Reform UK, formerly known as the Brexit Party)
The Government’s whole Covid strategy since the summer has been centred around, and reliant upon, the mass testing regime; the much-heralded PCR swab tests and their network of Lighthouse laboratories. The test’s accuracy is essential and has driven all our leaders’ decisions across the four nations.
Now evidence is emerging that this test, when processed in these ‘gold standard’ labs, may have led us to the wrong location. In Italy, legal actions are under way against PCR testing companies. A Portuguese court has ruled the PCR test unreliable, whilst Norway double checks positive PCR results with a second test; is that one of the reasons why their cases are lower than ours? In the UK, reasons for doubt grow by the week. More and more results from the new lateral flow test (LFT) show sharp reductions in cases compared to PCR positives.
First it was Liverpool, where the LFT produced only 0.7 per cent positives, just one in five of the PCR positive results in the same community taken over the same period. Liverpool City Council said they would double-check all the LFT positives but have so far refused to produce the results...
The universities of Bristol, Birmingham and St Andrews have done more than 8,000 LFTs between them with just four positives, a rate of 0.05 per cent. Meanwhile at Cambridge University, in the week to December 6, their PCR results showed 11 positives, after being processed in their very own Cambridge Lighthouse laboratory, a rate of 0.5 per cent. But when these positives were double-checked with a second PCR test, all 11 were found to be false positive. That is 100 per cent false positives...
Meanwhile hospitals and ICU departments are no busier than expected every winter, indeed some are quieter, with fewer operations. All this while many thousands of excess deaths are occurring at home involving non-Covid issues, many of whom would surely have gone to hospital...
If the Government refuse to do the treble-check test, we have to ask why? If they are so confident in their PCR regime, why not prove it? What are they scared of? Surely key individuals will be keen to prove their accuracy to protect their reputations. The PCR mass testing regime is the bedrock foundation of this Government’s Covid strategy; it must be right to confirm its validity.
Of course, if mass PCR testing is proven to be unreliable, everything changes. Resignations would follow, the taxpayer can stop forking out large sums for inaccurate data and the incidence of the virus will be proven to be lower. We may then be able to get back to normal faster. We have the right to the facts.
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/covid-testing-we-have-a-right-to-the-facts-on-pcr/
We will find that wearing masks is a health risk
I would guess this is more about politics and persecution than virus.
The steward and his ilk are the sort of people Solzhenitsyn said to go after. Petty tyrants who further the master’s cause. Don’t ignore the masters though.
Apparently typing clear posts on FR ain’t for everyone, either ... but I agree with you! :-P
It’s been years since I flew. What about keeping small children under a blanket if they won’t wear a mask?
No airlines are transportation utilities not private businesses. They serve the public.
Masks are fomites. Of course they’re a health risk.
Your attitude is exactly why the airline industry operates the way it does. It is forced to cater to the whims of government bureaucrats and various assorted misfits who represent “the public” in some official capacity.
Plenty of businesses do not serve the public.
Ten to one a chinese operative is embedded within the company in a position to make these rules.
Like Air BNB and Uber, people need to make an app to set up charter flights on smaller airplanes.
Shooting babies in the head, virtually, by weaponizing money, speech and now travel.
This is communism.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.