I’ll step up and just say it. Flying aint for everyone. And 2 year olds who cant follow the rules and their parents shouldnt fly commercial. And Im a strong believer who thinks the entire mask thing is b. S. I think afew people shouldnt fly. Like that woman who opens a gatl6ic salad on the plane and starts chowing down, or the perd6on with all their luggage who drags a huge back pack, a carry on and a shoulder bag and proceefs to clog ip the islr, trying to shove all that into thr overhead. .
15 Dec: Conservative Woman UK: Covid testing: We have a right to the facts on PCR
by Richard Tice
(Richard Tice is chairman of Reform UK, formerly known as the Brexit Party)
The Government’s whole Covid strategy since the summer has been centred around, and reliant upon, the mass testing regime; the much-heralded PCR swab tests and their network of Lighthouse laboratories. The test’s accuracy is essential and has driven all our leaders’ decisions across the four nations.
Now evidence is emerging that this test, when processed in these ‘gold standard’ labs, may have led us to the wrong location. In Italy, legal actions are under way against PCR testing companies. A Portuguese court has ruled the PCR test unreliable, whilst Norway double checks positive PCR results with a second test; is that one of the reasons why their cases are lower than ours? In the UK, reasons for doubt grow by the week. More and more results from the new lateral flow test (LFT) show sharp reductions in cases compared to PCR positives.
First it was Liverpool, where the LFT produced only 0.7 per cent positives, just one in five of the PCR positive results in the same community taken over the same period. Liverpool City Council said they would double-check all the LFT positives but have so far refused to produce the results...
The universities of Bristol, Birmingham and St Andrews have done more than 8,000 LFTs between them with just four positives, a rate of 0.05 per cent. Meanwhile at Cambridge University, in the week to December 6, their PCR results showed 11 positives, after being processed in their very own Cambridge Lighthouse laboratory, a rate of 0.5 per cent. But when these positives were double-checked with a second PCR test, all 11 were found to be false positive. That is 100 per cent false positives...
Meanwhile hospitals and ICU departments are no busier than expected every winter, indeed some are quieter, with fewer operations. All this while many thousands of excess deaths are occurring at home involving non-Covid issues, many of whom would surely have gone to hospital...
If the Government refuse to do the treble-check test, we have to ask why? If they are so confident in their PCR regime, why not prove it? What are they scared of? Surely key individuals will be keen to prove their accuracy to protect their reputations. The PCR mass testing regime is the bedrock foundation of this Government’s Covid strategy; it must be right to confirm its validity.
Of course, if mass PCR testing is proven to be unreliable, everything changes. Resignations would follow, the taxpayer can stop forking out large sums for inaccurate data and the incidence of the virus will be proven to be lower. We may then be able to get back to normal faster. We have the right to the facts.
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/covid-testing-we-have-a-right-to-the-facts-on-pcr/
Apparently typing clear posts on FR ain’t for everyone, either ... but I agree with you! :-P
I agree 100% with every word you typed.
I think...
Later in 1967 when he went with his company to Vietnam, he had volunteered for the tour as he figured he would have to go eventually anyway, so he might as well go anyway ans get it behind him. They traveled overland to Stockton, CA and from there by ship to Nam.
What’s a gatl6ic salad?
what? you barely make sense.
Yuo ne6ed an edi6tor.