So he's telling Biden there's a chance ........... YEA!
Posted on 12/09/2020 9:04:17 AM PST by Red Badger
I'm no math wiz, but that's a whole lot of zeroes..........
Joe Biden’s “victory” that was manufactured in the early morning hours following Election Day was improbable. We knew that. But when we put the numbers to the test based on known data and reliable prediction models, it turns from improbable to outright impossible according to a professor named in the lawsuit filed with the Supreme Court by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton.
Rutgers Professor Charles J. Cicchetti, Ph.D., worked out the numbers based on the lead President Trump had before vote counting was suddenly and inexplicably halted in the late hours on Election Day, only to be resumed in some cases without observers present. His calculations were based on historical data, most prevalently voting patterns in the 2016 election, and concluded that it is essentially impossible. According to the lawsuit:
9. Expert analysis using a commonly accepted statistical test further raises serious questions as to the integrity of this election.
10. The probability of former Vice President Biden winning the popular vote in the four Defendant States—Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin—independently given President Trump’s early lead in those States as of 3 a.m. on November 4, 2020, is less than one in a quadrillion, or 1 in 1,000,000,000,000,000. For former Vice President Biden to win these four States collectively, the odds of that event happening decrease to less than one in a quadrillion to the fourth power (i.e., 1 in 1,000,000,000,000,0004). See Decl. of Charles J. Cicchetti, Ph.D. (“Cicchetti Decl.”) at ¶¶ 14-21, 30-31. See App. 4a-7a, 9a.
11. The same less than one in a quadrillion statistical improbability of Mr. Biden winning the popular vote in the four Defendant States—Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin—independently exists when Mr. Biden’s performance in each of those Defendant States is compared to former Secretary of State Hilary Clinton’s performance in the 2016 general election and President Trump’s performance in the 2016 and 2020 general elections. Again, the statistical improbability of Mr. Biden winning the popular vote in these four States collectively is 1 in 1,000,000,000,000,0005. Id. 10-13, 17-21, 30-31.
12. Put simply, there is substantial reason to doubt the voting results in the Defendant States.
Put another way, that puts Joe Biden’s odds at 1 in 1060. Anything beyond 1051 is considered absolutely impossible by quantum physicists. There are somewhere between 1078 to 1082 atoms in the known universe. In other words, Joe Biden did not miraculously win Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin the morning after the election. Either he cheated or someone orchestrated massive cheating on his behalf.
The Texas lawsuit is a much-needed reprise following yesterday’s news that the Supreme Court has turned away an emergency petition for injunction filed by Republicans in the state. Though I gave the suit zero chance of being successful, there was still a sliver of hope when it seemed just about everyone else in MAGA world thought I was wrong. And perhaps I was, in a way. As I covered in the latest episode of NOQ Report, maybe the merits of the case were strong but the Supreme Court is looking to the Texas case as the real winner to push forward.
Even if you shave off one, two, or ten zeroes, it’s still an impossibility that Joe Biden pulled off a last second miracle without cheating massively. The Texas lawsuit may be the real miracle to make things right in this awful election.
Apparently this jack~wagon wasnt watching when The Cankle won 7 coin tosses in a row against The Bern.(?)
People have been convicted of murder based on DNA tests that have a lower probability than that
A quadrillion here, a quadrillion there, pretty soon you’re talking about some serious zeroes.
My gut told me that the prior report of 1 chance in a quadrillion was W-A-A-Y too low.
Heh, I was thinking of a pithy response along those lines, but you beat me to it!
Sigh.
We are dealing with two worlds.
In the old world that many think we are still in, rules matter. Standard of proof, laws, evidence, Election rules, etc., they all matter. In that world Joe Biden isn’t the president of the shuffleboard league in the nursing home he’s headed to. In that world, the Texas lawsuit and the others would receive a hearing, consideration of evidence and a reasoned judgement that, admittedly, might not always come out as we wished. But at least we would get a day in Court or rules and laws that had to be followed even if it meant a Trump win.
In the New World the left and the establishment are just in charge. They saw Donald Trump killing their privilege and payola. They saw masses supporting that. They simply decided to kick over the table and declare the game over. The old rules don’t apply. Now, democracy is a show trial for the result they are telling you is the result.
File a case under the new rules? Ha, case dismissed under the new rules of “in your face a-hole!!” You have no case because agal labal flabble gazabble babble. Ruling first, trial later which will be never under our ruling. You can’t prove it and we won’t let you so you can’t prove it.
So...there IS a chance.
Sounds vaguely familiar but my brain is old; please remind me.
Maybe even a googol! (1 with 100 zeroes. Don’t let Zuckerburg / Suckerburg get wind of it!) :-)
So he's telling Biden there's a chance ........... YEA!
In my basketball analogy, team Trump is leading 65-50 with 5 minutes to play. The crowd is kicked out. After that, officials say the game ends on a 30-5 run for team Biden to make the final score 80-70. And this happens 4 games in a row!!!
Should read 1 in 10 to the 60th power. The superscripts are just showing up as extra digits.
I think that’s all true.
And the big concern is that the Supreme Court may be part of that “new world” you describe.
For me, if decent people want to preserve the republic and the Constitution they need to play the game according to the new rules — the heck with legal niceties, precedent, and rules of evidence. Play the game the new way: “We think Biden cheated, cheaters must not be allowed to win, the election is set aside, delegations from the states (1 vote each) will decide the matter.”
I’m not holding my breath, but I would like to see 5 people on the Supreme Court just issue that ruling and be done in 5 minutes.
Only if there are true Patriots there, who are willing to buck the media who are making Biden the "President SELECT"
and not the condescending, spineless RINO crap that we are used to seeing.
It was all the leftist media that selected Biden, along with IT folks in Silicone Valley.
Ooops it says 6 here. Damn fact checkers!
https://dailystormer.su/lolwut-hillary-wins-six-coin-tosses-in-a-row-against-bernie/
Exactly, we’ll said!
In other words not a chance in }{€££.
The author wrote one quadrillion and four, not one quadrillion to the fourth power.
Math was my worst subject for my whole life and even I know that.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.