--
The Criswell strategy?
Posted on 11/21/2020 11:48:55 AM PST by Texas Fossil
The Trump campaign is bringing "legitimate accusations" to court through affidavits of credible witnesses and other evidence used in its challenges to electoral outcomes in various states, Federal Election Commission Chairman Trey Trainor said.
Trainor said his review of evidence, including numerous affidavits claiming voter fraud and a sworn statement by a prominent mathematician flagging up to 100,000 Pennsylvania ballots, met first level of legal scrutiny under what's known as motion to dismiss or "Rule 12(b)(6)" of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, which would dismiss less credible claims.
Noting subsequent legal threshold beyond a "motion to dismiss" is the "summary judgment phase," Trainor said that under this phase, the credibility of witnesses is presumed to be accurate, especially given the caliber of the testimonies Trainor has observed to date.
"When considering a motion for summary judgment, a judge will view all evidence in light most favorable to the movant's opponent," explains Cornell University Law School's Legal Information Institute website.
"What I would be concerned with, if I were on other side of these election contests that are going on around the country, is that if you look at level of evidence that has been provided by these affidavits — hundreds of affidavits that corroborate events that have happened on the ground — in a summary judgment phase of these cases, you have to take evidence of plaintiff as being true," Trainor told "Just the News AM" television show Friday morning.
"The court has to take the evidence of the plaintiff as being true and see whether or not the other side can make a case against it," added Trainor. "So, the massive amounts of affidavits that we see in these cases show that there was in-fact fraud that took place. And the other side really needs to answer these questions."
(Excerpt) Read more at justthenews.com ...
----
There you have it, it is massive!
I appreciate his voice on this, but can he DO anything? Is it just a ceremonial position?
According to some schmuck on RedState, sworn affidavits do not count as evidence.....I guess nothing less than a bloody knife with fingerprints counts as evidence in our new post 11/3/20 world
Right now google news headlines are that republican lawmakers are fed up with Trump and a zoom in of Rudy’s sweat...saying it’s not hair dye
i HATE these #$@#$@#$@#$@#$@#$ @#$@#$@#$@$@#$ @#$@#$@#$@# @#$@#$@#$$s
and YES, I said those out loud in Italian.
This way the neighbors can’t understand
“you have to take evidence of plaintiff as being true,”
I expect a lot of lower courts to find ways to disregard the evidence.
Trump has never brought an illegitimate claim.
Lord Fauci The Micro has.
The POS generals have.
Everyone on the left has, except for... wait, no, sorry.
John Kerry has, his pet Pierre Delecto has.
Trump has this in the bag oh ye of little faith.
One single person saying something doesn’t mean much but once you have 2, 3, 4 people who don’t know each other all saying the same thing, it’s evidence.
The Federal Election Commission (FEC) is an independent regulatory agency of the United States whose purpose is to enforce campaign finance law in United States federal elections. Created in 1974 through amendments to the Federal Election Campaign Act,[4] the commission describes its duties as “to disclose campaign finance information, to enforce the provisions of the law such as the limits and prohibitions on contributions, and to oversee the public funding of Presidential elections.”
The commission has not functioned since late August 2019, with an exception for the period of May 2020 to July 2020, due to lack of a quorum.[5][6] In the absence of a quorum, the commission cannot vote on complaints or give guidance through advisory opinions. As of May 19, 2020, there were 350 outstanding matters on the agency’s enforcement docket and 227 items waiting for action.
Not sure of the outcome, bit I do know this:
NEVER BET AGAINST DONALD TRUMP!!!
The very fact that there is legit evidence of fraud and if it is indeed massive...we may not be able to prove extent enough to overturn the election.
But if the saying is true about telling ‘big lies,’ then as a nation we know the Biden Regime is illegitimated.
In some manner I am OK with that for 2 years. Hold the Senate and reject all Executive Orders. We can do that. The next real question though is...can we secure the midterm election process? Trump knows there’s a major act of treason happening. He knows if things get overturned in his favor he will have a civil war on his hands. If he doesn’t win this battle I do not think he will be fading into the background anytime soon. I could see him picking up the mantle to insure valid and legal election process. This is where the battle truly rests. Yes, him in office and able to pursue this would be helpful, but I don’t think it necessary. We need him in office for other reasons as well. But with a civil war on his hands...how much of the agenda will get done?
even a glove that fits is not enough for some...
As I understand it, a sworn affidavit is DIRECT EVIDENCE.
There is in the public domain also CIRCUMSTANCIAL EVIDENCE, such as the fact that several states stopped reporting results within a few minutes of each other, when Trump was leading by a large margin, then started reporting results which now had Biden leading.
They also have FORENSIC EVIDENCE, for example, deviations from Benford's Law. Examples of this can be found on the internet, i.e., in plain view.
Sydney Powell called these sworn statements, “confessions.”
Lin Wood’s next step is in Federal Court.
Yes. Affidavits are certainly evidence.
They don’t yet realize the trap they are in.
This will not play out like they think.
YES
Smile. Good advice.
Ask yourself...Why was there a lack of Quorum?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.