Big Science Tells Biden What to Do

Creation Evolution Headlines ^ | 11-10-2020 | David F. Coppedge

[fishtank]

Big Science Tells Biden What to Do

November 10, 2020 | David F. Coppedge

There is perhaps no institution more globalist in outlook than Big Science, except perhaps the United Nations. Scientific sharing and collaboration is desirable, of course, unless it includes dual-use technologies: discoveries with civilian and military applications. China has long been guilty of stealing US technology secrets. Trump was strong against that, but China sees Biden as their friend who will let them have anything they want. Republicans point to how the Biden family could be severely compromised over prior deals with China for the Biden’s personal enrichment, making him potentially weak against their international excursions.

[fishtank]

..."The editors of Nature, the exemplars of Big Science, care little about such things.

They forget that the President of the United States is elected by US citizens for their security and prestige, to protect and secure individual liberties from all enemies foreign and domestic.

Nature‘s editors were absolutely aghast the day after the election to learn that so many citizens rejected the Democrat “blue wave” that the pollsters had wrongly predicted (4 Nov 2020).

They seem to think the US Presidency is their property."

[teeman8r]

not in our house.

there are four lights.

there are two sexes

[gw-ington]

Anti-Trump, pro-Biden Big Science is just as bad as Pro-Biden, Anti-Trump Big Tech.

[grey_whiskers]

[Eccl 10:2]

“Big Science Tells Biden What to Do”

###################

Big Scientism Tell Biden What To Do

FIFY

[chopperk]

The Chicoms are telling all of them what to do. They put up the Billions of dollars and Toe Headed Hunter took the first 1.8 billion and the Chicoms funded the rest of Joe’s campaign in order to open the doors for control of the World Reserve Currency to replace the American dollar. They must do this in order to recover economically. Joe will be history shortly, that is why Jill is keeping her day job.

[Seruzawa]

Yep. Big Science wants to spend even more billions on an even bigger particle accelerator, even though there is nothing that theory says could be gained from it. But, hey. Bigger is better right?

[rfp1234]

Big Science will tell Joke Bidet that U.S. energy independence is bad. Look at all the energy jobs in foreign countries that could be created, if we go back to kneeling before OPEC.

[Boogieman]

The market’s already flooded with accelerators, that’s a sucker’s game. I’m going to write up my own grant application for a trillion dollar particle deccelerator!

[DoodleBob]

This is a response to a Harvard Social Scences faculty member related to a Charles Murray presentation, but the core point is valid in this thread:

Science is not mathematics. Newtonian physics was wrong.
And social science is a further three rungs down in certainty from science.

Your level of certainty and arrogance about what can be said, and probably thought, smacks of religion, and not science. This is a political religion that permeates academia at the moment. And which I am fairly sure you will swear does not infect you, while the rest of us can see the symptoms quite plainly.

Only religions ban heretics from speaking because of the wrong-think they might cause. Real science loves a good heretic. In fact, honestly, the entire goal of science is to be a heretic. To have an idea that no other person ever had. Science is the pretty much the antithesis of your thought-police approach.

And most of academia used to be the antithesis of your thought police approach as well, until the religion of leftism took it over, with the direct help of people like you.

[pfflier]

Institutional science is ALWAYS right...Ask Galileo.

In the 1800's, train speed limits in England were regulated to below 60 MPH because any faster and the air would be sucked out of the passenger's lungs.

The Smithsonian Institution stated after Langley's failures, that man would not learn to fly for 1 million years. They said that months before the Wright brother's first flight in 1903.

In our time, we were told the sound barrier was impenetrable. Resistance to supersonic flight would reach an infinite value at the speed of sound and smash the plane to pieces.

Then they said it would be impossible to fly a manned mission to the moon because of the Van Allen belts.

Feel free to add to this list of scientific "truths".

[palmer]

Science is amoral. Ask any scientist if the human population should be reduced by 90% to save the earth. The Nazis were wrong, it turns out the master race is scientists.