Skip to comments.
Supreme Court Says Segregate All Votes After 8 PM On Election Day In Pennsylvania.
Twitter ^
| 11/06/20
| Wayne Allyn Root
Posted on 11/06/2020 5:08:54 PM PST by Enlightened1
BREAKING NEWS. Supreme Court says segregate all votes after 8 PM on Election Day in Pennsylvania. This race is not over. By along shot. #BOOM
https://twitter.com/RealWayneRoot/status/1324877471934607360
(Excerpt) Read more at twitter.com ...
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Pennsylvania
KEYWORDS: 8pm; alito; dsj03; scotus; segregate; supremecourt; votes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 ... 181-196 next last
To: Enlightened1
"Justice Olito has made his decision. Now let him enforce it."
101
posted on
11/06/2020 5:34:12 PM PST
by
Bratch
(If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.)
To: mylife
One doofus opens a ballot and tosses it in a pile. Another doofus runs the ballots through the tabulating machine. Envelope with post mark discarded. What time stamp ( not being belligerent towards you)
To: Cold War Veteran - Submarines
Then have another election !!
103
posted on
11/06/2020 5:34:26 PM PST
by
libh8er
To: toddausauras
NO they will have to void all AND have the legislators place the electors good lesson for them to learn!!!
To: Danette
From those tweets...
Someone should hang a garage door pull where they are counting ballots the fbi would be all over there...
105
posted on
11/06/2020 5:35:27 PM PST
by
Pocketdoor
(https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=uufeEhq25rc)
To: olivia3boys
“The cheaters are saying in reply: weve already been doing that...”
They have already stated they have not segregated the ballots after the Supreme Court told them to do so the first time. And how, once they are blended in, can they be recognized?
106
posted on
11/06/2020 5:35:37 PM PST
by
odawg
To: Enlightened1
Haven’t they already been mixed in?
107
posted on
11/06/2020 5:35:46 PM PST
by
vigilante2
(Make liberals cry again)
To: Cold War Veteran - Submarines
One would hope we have a chain of custody for this very reason.
It is a very serious matter.
108
posted on
11/06/2020 5:36:23 PM PST
by
mylife
(The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
To: Enlightened1
And who is going to make them do it and do it correctly?
109
posted on
11/06/2020 5:36:24 PM PST
by
JustaCowgirl
(A vote for Joe Biden is a vote for empty smirking pantsuit Kamala Harris for President)
To: patriotspride
Their enforcement ability depends on what argument is brought to them.
I've been saying that if the state legislature brings the argument that it is they who have the Constitutional authority to make election law, and not the elections officials, the governor, or the state courts, and that the election is so corrupted by their unconstitutional power grab as to be beyond trustworthy, then the only option for the court is to nullify the certification and let the legislature exercise its Article II Section 1 power to select the electors directly.
The way to do it is this:
- Hold the recanvas and document the inconsistencies in the books.
- Prove that it is systemic and not just a statistical anomaly. Name names of perpetrators and provide whistleblower testimony, if possible.
- Argue in front of the Supreme Court that the Constitution provides for the remedy of the state legislature, acting as the representative of the people in a republic, to select the Electors in a failsafe situation, as long as the Court finds the management of the election to be so fraudulent and untrustworthy as to vote to decertify it.
- Then have the GOP state legislatures meet to vote on the following:
- Have their GOP legislature make a vote of no confidence in the outcome of the election, citing a) widespread non-compliance with the election laws as passed by the legislature, and b) numerous examples suspicious behavior in the counting of the votes.
- Have a second vote to express the sentiment of the legislature that the people of their state intended to vote for President Trump.
- Have a third vote to exercise their Article II Section 1 power to appoint the Trump slate of electors to the Electoral College.
Then let Biden take THAT to the Supreme Court.
-PJ
110
posted on
11/06/2020 5:36:30 PM PST
by
Political Junkie Too
(Freedom of the press is the People's right to publish, not CNN's right to the 1st question.)
To: ifinnegan
If they dont like it, take it up with local the election officials who caused their votes to be disqualified.Possible additional expense. Just outside the elections office leave a goodly supply of tar and feathers. May be a bit expensive but it will be worth it.
To: Cold War Veteran - Submarines
Ever been in an investigation?
They don’t always identify the perp but they do identify shenanigans.
112
posted on
11/06/2020 5:37:44 PM PST
by
mylife
(The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
To: Political Junkie Too
By the time SCOTUS rules on this, the elections officials will say “Sorry, we accidentally comingled those ballots into the general mix and can’t back them out from the counts anymore. The intern who made this mistake has been reprimanded with a sternly worded letter in his permanent file.”
*****************************************
Well, that is not going to work. The Secretary of State Kathy Boockvar sent an email to all the poll workers telling them not to separate the ballots. At least, that’s what the PA legislators said when they called for her to resign.
113
posted on
11/06/2020 5:37:50 PM PST
by
kara37
To: rolling_stone
Strip the votes counted after they stopped counting at 2am
114
posted on
11/06/2020 5:38:49 PM PST
by
griffin
To: mewzilla
Whats the remedy if PA has made certain that those ballots cannot be segregated? Simple. Invalidate the election and make only those who voted on election day vote again. Or else award it to the person who was leading on election night.
115
posted on
11/06/2020 5:39:10 PM PST
by
libh8er
To: Enlightened1
Please someone tell me this is good news.🙏🏻
To: griffin
sounds like a reasonable remedy
To: kara37
Well, then she's in contempt of court and can be used as prima facia evidence of vote fraud.
That's all that SCOTUS would need to set aside the certification of the election and hand the remedy to the legislature via Article II Section 1.
-PJ
118
posted on
11/06/2020 5:40:17 PM PST
by
Political Junkie Too
(Freedom of the press is the People's right to publish, not CNN's right to the 1st question.)
To: crz
I really like the sound of that.
To: libh8er
Do the same for GA, MI and WI!
120
posted on
11/06/2020 5:40:55 PM PST
by
Mr Fuji
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 ... 181-196 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson