Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Here's Why Trump's Final Debate Was a Game-Changer
Townhall.com ^ | October 23, 2020 | Larry O'Connor

Posted on 10/23/2020 12:10:39 PM PDT by Kaslin

Anyone who has read this byline over the years knows that I'm not in the prediction business. I rarely take the precious space this fine website grants me to tell you what I think or believe may happen in the future, especially when it comes to how Americans will vote.

Anyone who tries to predict how the American electorate will respond to the candidacy of Donald Trump is lying to you and themselves and engaged in a fool's errand. This is a political figure who has defied every ounce of conventional wisdom in the five short years he has been engaged in electoral politics, and if the 2020 election is any indication thus far, that phenomenon continues.

Remarkably, the majority of my very well-paid colleagues who dabble in the dark art of political commentary and analysis on television didn't learn this simple lesson after the 2016 presidential election. But, there they are again, telling their viewers that the election is "Biden's to lose" and "Trump is way behind" and (my personal favorite) "Biden is favored to win in 87 out of 100 scenarios!"

However, taking into account the well-executed disclaimer above, I'd like to take a few moments to explain why I think President Trump's debate performance Thursday night could very well be the game-changing event he needed to head straight to re-election eleven days from now.

1. The Tone

I'm not one of those voters who really gives a flip about whether a politician "sounds presidential" or not. Most of the men who have held the office of president of the United States have had huge egos. It's sort of a pre-requisite to put yourself out there as a potential "leader of the free world," isn't it? I expect that most of the presidents and presidential candidates in my lifetime have been insufferable jerks behind the scenes and they put on their phony "presidential" face to con the voters.

That said, we must recognize that many voters do crave a straight-forward, serious tone in their president, and their opinions on this matter should not be dismissed. After all, they vote too.

The latest RCP average of polls shows Biden leading 51% to 42%. (I know, the national polls are irrelevant because of the electoral college, but for the point I am about to make, the national polls actually serve a purpose.)

To me, the remarkable aspect of this poll is not that Biden is leading. It's that it shows 7% of the electorate is undecided. Really? Undecided? This late in the game? And with these two politicians? One who has been fed into our consciousness in every aspect of our lives over the past five years and is currently the president and the other who was vice president and has been in the public sphere for nearly five decades? Who in the hell are this 7% who can't make up their minds?

And then it hit me: They aren't undecided, they lean Trump, but they are waiting to make that final commitment. Something is stopping them. Something relatively intangible. It's the "tone" thing. They are down with his policies and achievements, but they just don't like the guy's attitude. They prefer the "presidential" thing.

Last night, Trump gave them just enough of that tone to help them make that commitment in the final days of the campaign.

Again, I don't give a flip about the tone thing; I evaluate results. Would I like my president to be the second coming of George Washington and Abraham Lincoln? Sure. Is that guy even running for office in this era? Hell no... I mean, the mobs are tearing down statues of the real Washington and Lincoln, so why would our era's version step up?

2. The Oil

It can't be overstated: Trump getting Biden to admit that he will end the oil industry was a seminal moment. It was the perfect confirmation of just how radical, out-of-touch and destructive Joe Biden and the Democratic Party have become.

The proof is in the Biden campaign's embarrassing attempt to gaslight the world and tell us all that what we heard Biden say is not at all what we heard Biden say.

Yeah right. He was just talking about subsidies. OK... let's watch the moment together, shall we?

Biden has been telling the country that he is not beholden to the radicals in his party pushing the Green New Deal. Of course, we don't really believe him, but many voters are more than prepared to allow themselves to be fooled by such gaslighting. But this is indisputable. It comes from his own mouth and semi-coherent words.

It's less about oil, although, in Pennsylvania, Ohio, and really anywhere else people like cars (I hear cars are big in Michigan), than it is about Biden voluntarily confirming that he is aligned with the radical Left to upend our nation's economy and way of life.

There's one other thing about this moment that helps Trump. Watch the video again. Do you see it? Trump created this moment. He had to take charge of the stage, raise his hand to stop the moderator from moving along, and challenge Biden directly with the question that should have been asked and forced the agenda. This is an Alpha-leadership move and it is the kind of thing that people genuinely want in a leader, regardless of politics.

3. The Outsider

Donald Trump has been president for four years. He is the leader of the free world and has been at the center of every American political issue for over five years. And yet, somehow, he is still running as an outsider.

It's an amazing thing.

He got an assist from the Democrats since they nominated the longest-serving politician in America who has been the ultimate insider and personification of stagnant, do-nothing DC politics for that entire time. Trump skillfully took that gift and hammered home the most important message of his candidacy last night.

A sample: 

"That’s a typical political statement. Let’s get off this China thing, and then he looks: 'The family around the table,' everything. Just a typical politician when I see that. I'm not a typical politician. That’s why I got elected."

"See, it's all talk, no action with these politicians. Why didn't he get it done? [You say], 'That's what I'm going to do when I become president' – you were vice president along with Obama as your president, your leader for eight years. Why didn't you get it done? You had eight years to get it done."

"Joe, I ran because of you. I ran because of Barack Obama. Because you did a poor job. If I thought you did a good job, I would have never run."

In the final third of the debate, Trump was able to settle into this theme very comfortably. It's no wonder it's what vaulted him into the lead in the 2016 Republican primary and on to victory that November. Anyone who is still undecided is probably a voter who does not traditionally align themselves on a regular basis with one party or the other. They are independent. These voters like outsiders.

They liked Ross Perot. They like Barack Obama. They like Donald Trump.

He was able to remind them that even though he's the president, he's still the consummate outsider compared to the likes of Joe Biden.

Again, I don't pretend to tell you how voters will line up in eleven days, and I won't insult your intelligence by assuring you that this thing is settled for either of these candidates. If I had that kind of undeserved arrogance and hubris, I'd be a television analyst.

I only say this; President Trump had a couple of important goals to achieve in this last debate to give Trump-shy or Trump-hesitant voters enough reason to commit to him. In my opinion, for what it's worth, he achieved those important goals. And then some.



TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2020election; biden; debate; debates; donaldtrump; election2020; joebiden; landslide; trumplandslide
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last
To: TheConservativeTejano

President will not win NY, CT. Mass, VT.R.I.,Marryland, and N.J. out east. Hiding Biden will not win Oregon, Washington, California, and NM. He will take all the other states.

President Trump may take the states of N.J. and California.


You’re not making sense.

You say the President will not take N.J., then you say he “may” take N.J.

You say Hiding Biden will not win California, then you say President Trump “may” take California. Who else might take California?


41 posted on 10/23/2020 3:07:12 PM PDT by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The article nailed it.

On the corrupt politician theme that Trump hammered home, nobody has proven Trump to be corruptly enriching his pockets while in office.

In fact, he’s only taking $1.00/year salary as President. He’s frigging DONATING his time, people!!

Trump needs to “brag” about the fact that he’s only paid $1.00/year.

So even if Trump did some tricky deals as a businessman and took advantage of his competition, it’s not relevant to the discussion when we are evaluating his performance as President.


42 posted on 10/23/2020 3:15:03 PM PDT by AlanGreenSpam (Obama: The First 'American IDOL' President - sponsored by Chicago NeoCom Thugs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

FWIW...The number at all Biden appearances for texting donations to his campaign: 30330? If you divide 2020 ÷ 666 = 30330. There will be a decimal point in the number, but the answer will be those numerals: 30330.


43 posted on 10/23/2020 3:16:27 PM PDT by Tucker39 ("It is impossible so to rightly govern a nation without God and the Bible." George Washington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

Voting in person on election day with no exceptions other than active military and they should not get absentee ballots but there should be “precincts” and polls set up on the relevant bases.


44 posted on 10/23/2020 3:28:34 PM PDT by arthurus ( covfefe H0O)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

For what it’s worth Trump’s campaign seems unconcerned.””

Trumps been here before. He saw Florida going to Hillary...then it didnt...


45 posted on 10/23/2020 4:10:27 PM PDT by TalBlack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Why is the Vegas betting line -180 Biden, +135 Trump? That means Biden is favored...why? I guess betters are stupid?


46 posted on 10/23/2020 4:57:12 PM PDT by CincyRichieRich (2020: Broken glass election : Republic or no Republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

But Sleepy Joe said he changed his mind about oil this morning! The thing about a lie, you gotta know it’s not true when you tell it. Joe can’t remember what he said as soon as the words leave his mouth apparently. So Joe isn’t a liar at all, he just can’t remember.


47 posted on 10/23/2020 5:19:58 PM PDT by WilliamOrby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: entropy12

“Cash to pick up stocks cheap if Biden wins.”

Only problem with that strategy is that for 4 years of Biden, your stocks will only continue to plummet........

And when Tom Cotten is elected in 2024, it will be another year or two before your stocks get back to where they are today, maybe more.

I’d buy gold. As a Biden hedge.....


48 posted on 10/23/2020 6:31:41 PM PDT by Arlis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Arlis

History does not confirm what you said. Stocks have done better under democrat presidents than republican presidents since WWII.

It could be because democrats spend more and that creates inflation including in stock prices.


49 posted on 10/23/2020 7:11:33 PM PDT by entropy12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: CincyRichieRich

Betters read the polls.


50 posted on 10/23/2020 7:12:31 PM PDT by entropy12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: CincyRichieRich

Hillary was favored too in the betting, right through election day


51 posted on 10/23/2020 7:19:55 PM PDT by JBourne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

"With 175 days of “lid” in his campaign..."


Liddin' Biden.

52 posted on 10/23/2020 7:30:19 PM PDT by Songcraft
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DuncanWaring

Should I say then too close to call the race in N.J.

Also, race in California to close to call this presidential race in CA.

President Trump will be the winner on Nov. 3rd.

53 posted on 10/23/2020 8:57:09 PM PDT by TheConservativeTejano (God Bless Texas..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: my job

Partner, yup, there is too much fraud in Oregon.

President Trump, we can say will not win the state of Oregon.

54 posted on 10/23/2020 8:59:17 PM PDT by TheConservativeTejano (God Bless Texas..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
This is a political figure ...

No; he ain't!

55 posted on 10/24/2020 5:38:33 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dp0622
What percentage of all voters could have possibly voted already?

It mattereth not; if we have no idea WHO was voted for!

56 posted on 10/24/2020 5:40:39 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: dp0622

It’s like the “polls are still open out west” mantra

East coast voters vote “early”.
Will that have any effect on West coast voters?


57 posted on 10/24/2020 5:42:31 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The truth is Trump has never been behind, the polls are BS gas lighting and nobody is “undecided” at this point.


58 posted on 10/24/2020 5:43:51 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: entropy12

History does not confirm what you said. Stocks have done better under democrat presidents than republican presidents since WWII.

It could be because democrats spend more and that creates inflation including in stock prices.
——-
That is so. It is also so that the numbers are heavily slanted towards earlier Democrats, and Democrats following capitalist principals. For example post-WWII Truman when we were the world’s sole industrial power, post-JFK supply-side tax cuts, and post-1995 Clinton where he yielded to a Republican Congress.


59 posted on 10/24/2020 5:23:15 PM PDT by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: lepton

You got it right.
Biden Kamala team does not understand business and Kamala is anti-business. If elected they will cancel all what Trump has done.


60 posted on 10/24/2020 10:00:05 PM PDT by entropy12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson