Posted on 10/04/2020 5:08:32 AM PDT by SkyPilot
A paper published in the New England Journal of Medicine has called for mandating a coronavirus vaccine, and outlined strategies for how Americans could be FORCED to take it.
The paper warns that an immediate mandate for the vaccine would spark too much resistance and backlash, so the writers suggest that at first it should be voluntary.
However, it suggests that if not enough people are willing to get the vaccine within the first few weeks of it’s availability, it should be transformed into an obligation, with penalties put into place for refusal.
The paper outlines “six trigger criteria” that need to be met before the vaccine is made mandatory, and that it should be rolled out to specific demographics of the population first.
“Only recommended groups should be considered for a vaccination mandate,” initially, according to the paper, which cites “high risk groups” as the first set of people.
“[T]he elderly, health professionals working in high-risk situations or working with high-risk patients…persons with certain underlying medical conditions,” as well as those in “high-density settings such as prisons and dormitories” should be mandated to get the jab, the paper says.
It also suggests that active-duty military service members should be among the first that are forced into the vaccination.
The paper proclaims that “noncompliance should incur a penalty” and notes that it should be a “relatively substantial” one.
It suggests that “employment suspension or stay-at-home orders,” should be issued, but that fines should be discouraged because they can be legally challenged, and “may stoke distrust without improving uptake.”
The paper also suggests that government health authorities should avoid making public their close relationship with vaccine manufacturers, to quell public mistrust.
(Excerpt) Read more at summit.news ...
Yes and has been repeatedly reported this is not injectable but placed on the packaging so that the supply chain can be monitored. It is not injected biologically.
This stuff gets tiresome. Between the armchair Dr google experts and those convinced that there is a grand CJ doorway to turn us into mushrooms by genetic manipulation while tagging us. Could we possibly look more neurotic?
As usual to what I think is its (Summit News) agenda (it is a Russian backed outfit), the article in the New England journal of medicine is much more nuanced, as far as any mandate, than the article in Summit News implies.
We have mandates on many vaccinations for what has historically been high risk childhood illnesses, and during the time these mandates have been working we have nearly eliminated the occurrence of most of those illnesses. And those vaccinations of children do have a penalty for non-compliance - your kid can’t attend the school.
As the authors of the New England Journal of medicine pointed out, in their opinions, any penalties that went with any mandates for a Covid-19 vaccination should not be either criminal or fines. What they are suggesting is more like schools do to today - without the vaccine, the services or work you seek can’t be approved. Such penalties could actually be employed by employers without any legislation by anyone.
So what is Summit News doing? Trying to scare “the right”.
I knew it folks. First it was masks, now it’s going to be mandatory vaccines or you can’t go to Walmart, and finally it’s going to be the Mark of the Beast. When are people going to wake the F up?
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microchip_implant_(human)
It’s available already some states have passed laws banning it ( we’ve had it for pets for a number of years now)
I hope these clowns are happy because I’m done getting flu shots of any kind because of this. As with every other shot I ever got, they were for my protection. Except for blood donations, I’m not getting a needle and injected with whatever’s in it for others. If that’s what they want this about and want to force it on me, then F them hard.
This healthcare worker says take the vaccine. This is sort of the point. That’s why I lean on the science and not the politics.
Oh please. Lots of vaccines require multiple doses. The hand wringing is a bit over the top
However, it suggests that if not enough people are willing to get the vaccine within the first few weeks of it’s availability, it should be transformed into an obligation, with penalties put into place for refusal.
—
I know! They can just call it a tax!
You’re too deep in your gasses.
Bill Gates has been talking about it openly. It is also where we are headed for banking and financial records as well.
“Digital certificates” which indeed will be implanted in people. The “microneedle” skin delivery of the vaccines are in fact developed to provide that.
Ever heard of nanotechnology?
You may pride yourself on your med background, but I’ve got one in tech and cybersecurity. ID2020 is a consortium Gates set up and largely funded, through his GAVI, as part of the ongoing plan for this.
I’ve already posted patent and tech journal links on this stuff to this thread. You’ve got...nothing.
Whoever told you flu mist was dead out and out lied to you. Flumist is a live attenuated Boris. The flu shot is inert (dead)
Oh, and so deep in your gasses there, doc, you apparently know nothing about mRNA vaccines either.
The last time I got ‘vaccinated’ was in the late 60’s for the Hing Kong Flu.
I knocked me down for 10+ days. NO INCOME.
LAST time I got vaccinated for anything.
I will probably take the vaccine, but this strongly reminds me of the seat belt laws. In the beginning, just a slogan (buckle up for safety, buckle up!). Then, the ‘automatic’ belts and buzzers. When that didn’t accomplish their goal, they passed laws. “But hey, we’re not going to stop people just for that!” or so they said. Now, not only will you be pulled over and ticketed just for that infraction, but it has become an excuse to pull over any vehicle.
Just the tip, I swear, that’s all.
-
You’re right. That’s the very moment America began going downhill - when the government felt perfectly comfortable compelling people to do something “for your own good” even if you weren’t hurting anyone else by doing it.
Opposition to seat belts is just stupid
Whoever told you flu mist was dead out and out lied to you. Flumist is a live attenuated Boris. The flu shot is inert (dead)
Huh? What?
Looks like your “spell checker” deserves a bonus this morning :-)
They're not worried...they'll be 'raptured' out just in time.
Yes because you simply can’t handle the argument. You are the worst of the worst. You make up graphics and call them the truth. You link things that are laughably incorrect and then wrap yourself in the cloak of truth. You are intentionally misleading people to advance your own agenda and resort to name calling when some one disagrees. And offers evidence to the contrary.
There is no difference between you and the liberals who lie wirh great aplomb and then say it worked so the lie was worth it
You are intellectually dishonest and emotionally argue with the fine skills of a 4 year old. Please. Stop helping true conservatives. You give us a lousy name.
“It’s available already some states have passed laws banning it ( we’ve had it for pets for a number of years now)”
*********************************
Yes, we’ve had our mutts responsibly microchipped for many years. But they’re not “invisible” nor can they “be read and programmed from the remote cloud level”. That would be quite a leap from reality to Koo Koo Land, IMHO.
Yup. Showers for those who do not comply.
I’m saying
1)the technology is there to do it. It is no big deal now- we can chip our pets. The chip is inserted with a needle.
2) a number of leftists have called for mandatory tracking data on people regarding Covid compliance
3). Would be extremely simple to combine the fear of covid, the push for mandatory vaccines and penalties for not complying with a simple chip tracking system
You seem to regularly make fun of people who dare to speculate on things that might or could happen. Bill Gates/ microsoft do have a parent on a blockchain technology that can be used to track biometric data for the purpose of earning blockchain money through movement. Did you see the patent description above ?
I’m not saying all this has come together in one place, I’m just saying the technology is not a barrier at this point, it is possible to do and there may be a push for it.
I don’t know why you feel the need be rude.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.