Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Supreme Court Nominations Have Become a Matter of Life and Death
Frontpage Mag ^ | September 23, 2020 | Don Feder

Posted on 09/26/2020 11:21:24 AM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Rioting in New York, threats of court-packing, promises of arson at the thought of Trump replacing its demi-god with a justice who actually believes in the Constitution. The left is rabid.

Even character assassination (a la the Bret Kavanaugh inquisition) is no longer enough. When will the hostage-taking start?

The President has Article II power to nominate “judges of the Supreme Court.” Donald Trump’s power doesn’t extend to the next election, but to the next inauguration -- still four months away.

The composition of the United States Supreme Court was a major issue in the 2016 election. Voters balked at the idea of giving that supreme power to the Queen of Corruption, the Bonnie Parker of Illegal E-Mails. Trump was empowered to nominate justices for his entire term of office.

The media told us conservatives had a 5-4 majority prior to Ginsberg’s death. This was meant to soothe us into a false sense of complacency.

In reality, it’s now 4-4 at best. Chief Justice John Roberts is a turncoat who sides with the left (Breyer, Kagan and Sotomayor) on the really important stuff. That’s why a replacement for Ruth Bader Ginsburg has become the center of a storm that makes Hurricane Laura seem like a summer breeze.

At the time of the Kavanaugh circus, I said it was a dress rehearsal for choosing Ginsburg’s replacement. World War III just broke out.

For decades, the judiciary has been the left’s House of Lords. It can lose the presidency. It can lose Congress. But as long as it has the courts – the Supreme Court in particular – democracy is in chains.

(Excerpt) Read more at frontpagemag.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events; Philosophy; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 1stamendment; 2ndamendment; antifa; blm; compromisedroberts; democrats; election2020; insurrection; johnroberts; leftists; liberals; marxists; nomination; rbg; revolution; rkba; scotus; supremecourt; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-52 next last

1 posted on 09/26/2020 11:21:24 AM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Because it became a political appointment.

They really should just decide whether a law is constitutional or not. If they decide not, the legislature and states can still amend the constitution. A long slow process but obviously it has been done.

But now they are another legislative political body. It is a shame but how can we change it back? When we nominate originalists we are told we are “right wing.” That really is not a “wing” position.


2 posted on 09/26/2020 11:24:02 AM PDT by Persevero (I am afraid propriety has been set at naught. - Jane Austen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Persevero

They stopped upholding the Constitution in the 1930s when they helped FDR kick the Constitution to the curb. Now they uphold Arbitrary government where they can make shit up as they go along.


3 posted on 09/26/2020 11:26:05 AM PDT by Rurudyne (Standup Philosopher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 100American; 3D-JOY; abner; Abundy; AGreatPer; Albion Wilde; AliVeritas; alisasny; ...
PING!
4 posted on 09/26/2020 11:28:14 AM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (The Constitution guarantees the States protection against insurrection. Act now, Mr. President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rurudyne

Never should have left the gold standard.


5 posted on 09/26/2020 11:28:57 AM PDT by Eddie01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

For decades, the judiciary has been the left’s House of Lords. It can lose the presidency. It can lose Congress. But as long as it has the courts – the Supreme Court in particular – democracy is in chains.

__________________________________________________

As Thomas Jefferson feared. It was never meant to be this way. Every pet “civil right” of the Left was never meant to be treated as an amendment to the Constitution.


6 posted on 09/26/2020 11:32:21 AM PDT by Bishop_Malachi (Liberal Socialism - A philosophy which advocates spreading a low standard of living equally.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

What the Founders gave us is now a complete wreck.


7 posted on 09/26/2020 11:33:40 AM PDT by shanover (...To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them.-S.Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eddie01

Ironically we may be in better shape now for a gold standard than in 1973 as our money supply has not, IIRC, increased as fast as the price of gold. Assuming, of course, that there’s any gold remaining.

As for FDR, not only did he lawlessly seize the gold he immediately turned around and devalued the paper money he made people take for it ... FDR was a total scumbag.

Aside: the Constitution specifies the States cannot pay except in gold or silver coin ... we should hold them to that.


8 posted on 09/26/2020 11:37:04 AM PDT by Rurudyne (Standup Philosopher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
For decades, the judiciary has been the left’s House of Lords. It can lose the presidency. It can lose Congress. But as long as it has the courts – the Supreme Court in particular – democracy is in chains.

Translation: Liberal Democrat controlled judicial Oligarchy than reigns supreme over the other two branches of government.

9 posted on 09/26/2020 11:46:23 AM PDT by jeffc (I'm a Patriot, and the media are our enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks; All

After ACB’s appointment, it’ll be 5-4. After President Trump’s next appointment in his next term it will be 6-3. I can live with that.

At this point, the best we can hope for is to slow down the destruction of our Republic. ‘The Powers That Be’ will not be going quietly.

I think we all know that in our heart of hearts.


10 posted on 09/26/2020 11:49:07 AM PDT by Diana in Wisconsin (I don't have 'Hobbies.' I'm developing a robust post-Apocalyptic skill set.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

The Supreme Court needs to be concretely divested of power by Congress.


11 posted on 09/26/2020 11:51:34 AM PDT by Arcadian Empire
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
No one disputes that the upcoming election will be contentious.

Very possible scenario - a hard-fought battle, apparently won by Trump, but the results aren't in yet in some battleground states. "Found" and late Mail-in ballots keep trickling in as the recounts and re-re-recounts go on and on. Sound familiar?

Yeah, and just like 2000, it goes all the way up to SCOTUS to halt the recounts and declare the winner.

Maybe Amy Barrett is the deciding vote. Think that will sit well with the Dems?

Or maybe Amy Barrett isn't seated yet and SCOTUS is deadlocked at 4-4. How would Repubs like that?

12 posted on 09/26/2020 11:51:40 AM PDT by ZOOKER (Until further notice the /s is implied...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rurudyne
FDR? It started long before him with Woodrow Wilson. And Wilson was proposing extra-constitutional governance in 1887...
...in his seminal 1887 article, “The Study of Administration,” published in the same year that the first modern regulatory commission, the Interstate Commerce Commission, was created, Wilson explained that he wanted to counter “the error of trying to do too much by vote.” Hence, he admonished that “self-government does not consist in having a hand in everything,” while pleading for “administrative elasticity and discretion” free from checks and balances. Not surprisingly, Wilson’s conception of government run by administrative “experts,” unconstrained by popular consent, runs up against the traditional understanding of the Founder’s Constitution, with its tripartite system based on a separation of powers among the legislative, executive and judicial branches.
FDR greatly amplified what WW started.
13 posted on 09/26/2020 11:52:49 AM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom ("And oft conducted by historic truth, We tread the long extent of backward time.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

....matter of life and death....
////////////////////////////////////////
Yes, just ask the babies in their mothers’ wombs. Instead of a safe place, they are in deadly danger from a woman’s “right to choose” an abortion to kill them.


14 posted on 09/26/2020 12:05:19 PM PDT by frank ballenger (End vote fraud,harvesting,non-citizen voting & leftist media news censorship or we are finished.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Persevero
They really should just decide whether a law is constitutional or not

Where in the text of Article III, or anywhere else, do you find that power?

This rot goes back a long way.

15 posted on 09/26/2020 12:09:16 PM PDT by Jim Noble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Millions of aborted children since Roe v Wade are eternally aware of just how much United States Supreme Court nominations are a matter of life and death.


16 posted on 09/26/2020 12:22:13 PM PDT by T.B. Yoits
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble

I thought the job of the Supreme Court was to take up cases appealed where there is a constitutional question.

If not, then I’d like to know what you believe the job is.


17 posted on 09/26/2020 12:41:04 PM PDT by Persevero (I am afraid propriety has been set at naught. - Jane Austen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Anyone checked up on Stephen Breyer lately? He is 82 years old.


18 posted on 09/26/2020 12:45:26 PM PDT by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Buy weapons and ammo, folks. This does not stop at elections and appointments. Leftist democrats want you dead. All of them not just their paramilitary wing called antifa.

JoMa


19 posted on 09/26/2020 12:53:45 PM PDT by joma89 (Buy weapons and ammo, folks, and have the will to use them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ZOOKER

Roberts really needs to come clean about who has him by the short hairs and why. That way he can do his job on these election matters, then resign once a winner is ultimately decided and face the music.


20 posted on 09/26/2020 1:40:54 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (The Constitution guarantees the States protection against insurrection. Act now, Mr. President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-52 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson