Posted on 06/15/2020 9:43:32 AM PDT by Anti-Bubba182
The Supreme Court on Monday declined to hear the administration’s challenge to California’s main sanctuary city law protecting illegal immigrants, dealing a significant blow to President Trump’s hopes of forcing jurisdictions to cooperate with ICE.
The justices did not offer comment on their decision, though two — Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel A. Alito Jr. — said they wanted to hear the case. It takes four justices to put a case on the court’s calendar......."
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...
They just declined to hear would like to know who the justices were who declined to hear this is NOT the full court declining to hear!!
So, at most three justices thought that they should hear the case. Thomas, Alito, and possibly one more. This means that at least one of Trump's appointees voted against hearing this case.
Why do we even have a Supreme Court? They will not hear crucial cases which determine the future of our country and hinge upon the interpretation of the Constitution. They refuse to do their job. Might as well defund the Supreme Court.
If illegals were strongly supportive of Trump’s policies there wouldn’t be a single sanctuary city in the country. Its all about political power.
What happened to Gorsuch and Kavanaugh?
This is about getting rid of White people. In the end, if you’re still alive just look around and see whose riding high on the hog and not having to wear a mask.
Look who the lawyers are who always defend these invaders and how they are able to paralyze our system.
Your question was answered in the article.
Alito and Thomas are the only two who voted to hear the case. That means ALL the rest voted to not hear it.
“It is. The beginning of the end of this country as we have known it.”
It began when we let in the Bolsheviks after the Russian revolution. They had children who became lawyers and agitators and activists and educators. Now they rule us.
This ruling is catastrophic. This means people can come into the country in any number and the immigration laws cannot be enforced.
*************
If they’re not going to enforce laws we can play this game too.
“This ruling is catastrophic. This means people can come into the country in any number and the immigration laws cannot be enforced. It is a boon to demagoguing Democrats who will happily accommodate them for the votes.”
Nothing in the ruling prevents the Feds from continuing to enforce immigration laws. What it does though is inhibits cooperation from local law enforcement.
The best part of it though is that all of these leftists, government agents, activists, etc. are ALL going to ultimately be devoured by the hellhole leviathan they are creating.
They will keep feeding it until civilization itself is totally destroyed.
That’s the ONLY comfort.
😡
The Supreme Court is becoming another enemy of this country!
No protection..No country
I’ve always been cautious about forcing states to uphold Federal immigration laws in the first place — for the same reason why state and local law enforcement officers cannot be obligated to enforce Federal gun laws.
Unfortunately true.
But the swamp runs deep.
Just so frustrating to wait for Justice- But wait we must😑.
And we best get prepared for Trump to lose the election.
:(
Backed in to a corner will bring out the fight in us.
If this turns into a w...a...r..., pe.loi and others will the first ones to go do.wn, I guarantee! Go after the causers of this take.0ver.
Didn’t they already rule on Arizona’s SB1070 that “only fedguv can enforce immigration law”?
And doesn’t “sanctuary cities” violate that ruling?
Probably bush-mole kavanaught.
SO 3 justices on OUR SIDE voted down hearing the case, perhaps there was something WRONG in the filing of the case and they need to go back with different wording or such!!
Somehow I just knew.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.