Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/14/2020 6:09:37 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Kaslin

Good luck getting a writ from the D.C. circuit.


2 posted on 05/14/2020 6:11:44 AM PDT by billorites (freepo ergo sum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Sullivan has made himself the judge jury and prosecution. Nothing he rules will stand on appeal.
President Trump needs to end this joke now.


3 posted on 05/14/2020 6:14:39 AM PDT by SmokingJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Wasn’t it the judge who asked Flynn if he wanted to changes his plea months ago before Flynn brought in Sidney Powell?


4 posted on 05/14/2020 6:16:08 AM PDT by Sans-Culotte (With every passing day, I am a little bit gladder that Romney lost in 2012.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

The unmasking requesters names released yesterday... a huge story with the names of Biden and other biggies shown to be liars and treasonus. Turned on the TODAY show this morning to see how they spun it.... they didn’t...IT WAS NOT MENTIONED.


5 posted on 05/14/2020 6:17:13 AM PDT by DOC44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Judge Sullivan needs to be removed. One way or the other. Permanently.


6 posted on 05/14/2020 6:20:33 AM PDT by Uncle Sham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

What did the Constitution and law have to do with anything the left wants to do?


9 posted on 05/14/2020 6:26:23 AM PDT by maddog55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
Not so sure that the two situations - 1) a pro-forma waiver of speedy trial, and 2) dismissing charges to which the defendant already has pled guilty, are sufficiently similar for the former to be controlling precedent on the latter.

I'm sure Flynn will make that argument...but I'm not sure I buy it.

That being said, the case against Flynn is a travesty and should be dismissed at the government's request.

10 posted on 05/14/2020 6:27:04 AM PDT by Bruce Campbells Chin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Bronc0 likely called Sullivan and said:

“I mispoke about that Perjury charge and now look stupid. Clean that up, will ya!”


11 posted on 05/14/2020 6:27:05 AM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Imagine Judge Sullivan’s reaction if agents from the Justice Department’s Office of Judicial Integrity showed up in his chambers based on a “tip”. First asking him if he had been contacted directly by outsiders who were not a party to the case. He would of course decline to answer. But then warrants were issued for phone records, sworn statements of clerks, secretaries, court officers and finally a thorough investigation of his family’s financial transactions. All it takes is a “dossier”.


13 posted on 05/14/2020 6:30:21 AM PDT by allendale (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

I never read articles like this because there is no effective application of the constitution and there hasn’t been for years. Sullivan’s courtroom should be surrounded by thousands of righteous patriots in protest 24.x.365, but it won’t be. We’re a nation of leaderless cowards.


15 posted on 05/14/2020 6:33:11 AM PDT by JonPreston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

A judge is a judge not a prosecuting attorney.


18 posted on 05/14/2020 6:38:44 AM PDT by Don Corleone (The truth the whole truth and nothing but the truth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

“”The government’s motion to dismiss highlighted new evidence uncovered by an outside U.S. attorney, Jeff Jensen””

What on earth is an OUTSIDE U. S. Attorney?


24 posted on 05/14/2020 6:49:15 AM PDT by Thank You Rush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Absolutely incredible!! An op-ed written by the judge who is asked to serve in the case? What is happening? They don’t know enough to even keep their mouths shut about cases they will be hearing? Some people here are old enough to remember the furor caused by President Nixon when he remarked on the Charles Manson trial and here we have a judge showing clearly his bias...

Improper political influence?? He’s kidding, right? They are in WASHINGTON, DC where the only thing that matters is POLITICAL INFLUENCE!

“”The same day Judge Sullivan named Judge Gleeson to serve in the amicus curiae role, the Washington Post ran an op-ed co-authored by Gleeson, entitled, “The Flynn case isn’t over until the judge says it’s over.” “The Justice Department’s move to dismiss the prosecution of former national security adviser Michael Flynn does not need to be the end of the case—and it shouldn’t be,” he opened. Then, after misrepresenting the Rule 48(b)’s “leave of court” requirement, Gleeson suggests dismissal of the Flynn case would be inappropriate because “the record reeks of improper political influence.””


27 posted on 05/14/2020 6:56:39 AM PDT by Thank You Rush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

I think the Fokker case clearly addresses this issue, and provides an immediate remedy.


28 posted on 05/14/2020 7:01:36 AM PDT by Fido969 (In!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
Also see Post 14 - http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3844781/posts

. Good lead... thanks

Fokkering Judge Sullivan.
29 posted on 05/14/2020 7:03:14 AM PDT by ptsal (Vote R.E.D. >>>Remove Every Democrat ***)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Judge Sullivan is going senile. There is clearly something wrong with him. Its frightening the partisan evil going after Flynn, the left is really beginning to scare me.


40 posted on 05/14/2020 7:32:51 AM PDT by thirst4truth (America, What difference does it make?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
The Fokker decision was a 2016 decision from the D.C. Circuit Court and, as such, establishes “mandatory precedent,” i.e., precedent that must be followed, by all D.C. district court judges—including Judge Sullivan.

If we truly had an impartial Justice System, when Flynn Appeals this decision, the Appeals Court would hold Judge Sullivan in Contempt of Court and JAIL HIM for 30 days.
46 posted on 05/14/2020 7:49:05 AM PDT by eyeamok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Was Sullivan forced to commit this legal atrocity? I really doubt he came up with this himself.


58 posted on 05/14/2020 11:31:54 AM PDT by mom.mom (...our flag was still there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson