Posted on 05/12/2020 11:49:34 AM PDT by nwrep
In the Supreme Court Oral Argument on Congressional Subpoenas for President Trump's Financial Records broadcast live, Justice Sonya Sotomayor slipped up and said "WE" are asking for his personal tax returns", while questioning President Trump's lawyer Patrick Strawbridge. Her use of "WE" instead of referring properly to the Congressional subpoena showed her true colors.
Audio and transcript at 16:25 in the embedded video on the C-SPAN link.
Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life,”
Might as well said, “ME AND MY ANTI-AMERICAN COMMUNIST BUDDIES” are asking for his personal tax returns”
Democrat troll, paid to shill on conservative sites?
No, she was saying that she, Sonya Sotomayor, is one of the individuals requesting Trump’s tax returns.
We don’t need to act like Alinsky.
She used “we” because she feels deeply that she is requesting his returns.
Her use of “we” illustrates her perspective. It’s not the perspective of a judge, or a “Justice.”
I disagree with the ‘wise’ part preferring to refer to it as the ‘Wide Latina’.
You should see the sudden silence when I confront the 1619 mentality....”1619 is on the British not America until 1783. The Brits countenanced slavery in this country and we spent nearly 181 years trying to clean up the mess British tainted slavery left us with.
They forget that from 1619 until the final battle for freedom in 1783 we were a part of great Britain....so technically Great Britain should be paying reparations. There was no concept of America until 1776 and no real America until 1783...but no constitution for some years after that.
Sotomayor esta La Cucharacha of the Supremes.
Ginsberg is a relative of Yoda’s.
Thank goodness these weirdos are slipping into their whacko twilight years.
Recuse yourself, b!tch.
Yes, it is, but not with this House.
Rats will sometimes tell the truth.It doesn’t happen often and it’s almost always by accident...but it’s fun to behold when it does.
bttt
I’m sorry, did I not goose step to your satisfaction?
C-Span transcripts. All of them are in CAPS.
Correct. C-SPAN transcripts.
“Is it possible to impeach a SC Justice?”
Yes and it has been done. Samuel Chase was impeached by the House for political bias. He was found innocent by the Senate on all charges. He served until his death in 1811.
it would be funny if Trump invited her over to check them out with him
The same statute that the Dems are relying on gives the President almost unfettered authority to release anyone’s IRS records. Imagine the reaction in an alternate universe where President Trump had ordered the release of all of Pelosi’s and Schumer’s tax returns.
Hey, I’m not drunk. :^)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.