Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. stimulus package is biggest ever, but may not be big enough
Reuters ^ | March 30, 2020 | by Lawrence Delevingne, Howard Schneider

Posted on 03/30/2020 10:27:17 AM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer

The Federal Reserve has offered more than $3 trillion in loans and asset purchases in recent weeks to stop the U.S. financial system from seizing up, but it has not yet directly helped large swaths of the real economy: companies, municipalities and other borrowers with less than perfect credit.

That is partly because America’s central bank is not allowed to take much credit risk itself, and loans to lower-rated borrowers have a higher chance of losses. The risk is exacerbated by the spread of coronavirus which have brought economic activity to a screeching halt.

To alleviate that constraint, the U.S. Treasury - whose job it is to manage the government’s finances and help the Fed keep the economy steady - has taken on some of the risk that Fed loans will not be paid back.

It has contributed about $50 billion from a pool of money called the Exchange Stabilization Fund. That money will be used to absorb losses from Fed loans that go bad. Assuming only a fraction of loans will default, the Treasury contribution has allowed the Fed to lend much more without taking on additional risk.

On Friday, the Treasury got about $450 billion more from Congress as part of a $2.2 trillion U.S. stimulus package, greatly increasing its ability to support the economy. Before the bill passed, the stabilization fund had about $93 billion in assets as of the end of February.

Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin told Fox News on Sunday he believed the additional funds could help the Fed and Treasury provide about $4 trillion in loans.

But investors and economists said even this additional money may be insufficient, and Congress will likely need to pony up trillions of dollars more before the Fed and Treasury can make a significant dent in the real economy.

(Excerpt) Read more at reuters.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; US: New York; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: alreuters; china; fed; howardschneider; lawrencedelevingne; newyork; porkulus; porkulus2; porkulusii; reuters; treasury; unitedkingdom; virus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Hopefully Team Trump does not run out of ammo, at least until the Nov election is past


21 posted on 03/30/2020 10:43:11 AM PDT by nascarnation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

I really don’t know how this can be sustained.

I hear $2 Trillion, but also hear $6 Trillion as the actual cost. And this amount was predicated on a return to business relatively soon, as in mid-April. Now it’s end of April.. maybe. So how can this be sustained?


22 posted on 03/30/2020 10:44:28 AM PDT by Obadiah (Kill the deep state or lose the Republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Is the $2.2 trillion U.S. stimulus package bill available online?


23 posted on 03/30/2020 10:44:38 AM PDT by windsorknot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: windsorknot

https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/6201/text


24 posted on 03/30/2020 10:48:06 AM PDT by nascarnation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

“because America’s central bank is not allowed to take much credit risk itself”

I don’t know where they found that “rule”. I suspect that they made it up because it sounds good.


25 posted on 03/30/2020 10:48:16 AM PDT by Pelham (RIP California, killed by massive immigration)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

the markets are rallying - so i think we should cruise.


26 posted on 03/30/2020 10:49:08 AM PDT by avital2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rapscallion

“So do we continue on this road until China refuses to let the US borrow any more money?”

China could do that only if they decided to cut off their own access to the American consumer market. Buying bonds is the flip side of that trade.


27 posted on 03/30/2020 10:50:09 AM PDT by Pelham (RIP California, killed by massive immigration)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

At some point, the system will break down.


28 posted on 03/30/2020 10:52:48 AM PDT by Tzimisce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wny

That’s $1,000 each, about what we’re getting.
The other $1.85 trillion is for graft.


29 posted on 03/30/2020 10:56:12 AM PDT by Lurkinanloomin (Natural Born Citizens Are Born Here of Citizen Parents_Know Islam, No Peace-No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: gibsonguy

Rooters and Asspress suck more than usual, if that’s possible.


30 posted on 03/30/2020 11:00:57 AM PDT by Luke21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Translation: The democrats want way more money. And they want more to funnel to all there progressive causes. And they want more to funnel through their shell companies and then back to themselves.


31 posted on 03/30/2020 11:22:13 AM PDT by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Keynesianism died with The Carter Administration.

People are still arguing over the grave marker these 40 years later.


32 posted on 03/30/2020 11:29:26 AM PDT by Uncle Miltie (Messaging to Snowflakes: They stole it from Bernie AGAIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ealgeone

> Rep Massey(?) made a great point....for the $2 TRILLION we’re spending we could have sent a check for 13,300 to the 150,000,000 workers in the country. That’d be a better help than the $1,200/$3,400 people are getting.

Although some of the money is actually in the form of loans which the government anticipate will be paid back... (yes? dunno for sure...)


33 posted on 03/30/2020 11:48:20 AM PDT by SteveH (intentionally blank)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Luke21

Reuters and AP really have upped their game in the leftist BS
effort.


34 posted on 03/30/2020 11:57:09 AM PDT by gibsonguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

OK. Following that reason, the “stimulus” should be 50 trillion dollars, in one year. That should really “stimulate” the economy!

Obvious bull$h!t. What it will do is deflate the value of the currency leading to runaway inflation and poverty.

Pray tell, oh Holy Reuters Gurus of the economy — if more is better, then there is no limit to how much more. Where should it stop?

Like the minimum mandated hourly rate (”minimum wage”). If $15 is great, then 30 should be better. In fact, let’s go to 60. NO. I say 600. But why stop there? Make it 5,000 per hour and those McDonald’s burger flippers will all buy 148 room mansions with pools and tennis courts.

(Except that a 149 room mansion will cost $680.0 million and the burgers $5,000.)


35 posted on 03/30/2020 12:12:29 PM PDT by I want the USA back (The US media is the most destructive, mendacious irresponsible institution that there is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurkinanloomin

Still don’t understand why Trump signed this monstrosity.


36 posted on 03/30/2020 1:35:03 PM PDT by Sam Gamgee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson