Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

DOJ asks Supreme Court to preserve 'Remain in Mexico' border policy
The Washington Times ^ | Friday, March 6, 2020 | Stephen Dinan

Posted on 03/06/2020 11:52:21 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum

The Justice Department petitioned the Supreme Court on Friday to preserve the key program that solved last year’s border surge, after a lower court ruled it was illegal.

Known formally as the Migrant Protection Protocols (MPP), and more commonly called “Remain in Mexico,” the policy allows the U.S. to push migrants who entered from Mexico back across the border to wait for their immigration court dates.

About 60,000 migrants had been subjected to MPP.

The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals issued a ruling last week that MPP was illegal, but stayed the order. On Wednesday, the court gave the Justice Department a week to appeal to the Supreme Court or else the injunction against MPP would take effect.

In its petition to the Supreme Court on Friday the Justice Department said “chaos” erupted after the original 9th Circuit ruling, with large groups of migrants storming border ports of entry demanding immediate entry.

“Relief from this Court is therefore urgently needed,” wrote Solicitor General Noel J. Francisco.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 3judgepanel; 9thcircuit; 9thcircus; asylum; ferdinandfernandez; judiciary; ninthcircuit; ninthcircus; obamajudge; politicaljudiciary; rapinbilljudge; reaganjudge; richardpaez; richardseeborg; scotus; supremecourt; supremes; threejudgepanel; williamfletcher

1 posted on 03/06/2020 11:52:21 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
I be surprised if the SCOTUS doesn't strike down the 9th Circuit
Court ruling.
2 posted on 03/06/2020 11:55:11 AM PST by DoughtyOne (The DNC has a taxidermist on speed for Nancy, Hillary, and Ruth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

We better get Schmukie out there on the steps to “advise” the Justices.


3 posted on 03/06/2020 11:55:25 AM PST by gibsonguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

I’d be surprised if they do.

They’re all about Process Uber Ales. They’re going to kick it back to the 9th. for an en banc hearing. Meanwhile the injunction will go into place and eight or nine caravans will cross the border while the appeals wind slowly along.


4 posted on 03/06/2020 11:56:43 AM PST by Buckeye McFrog (Patrick Henry would have been an anti-vaxxer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

They MAY do a stay on the injunction and send it back for an en banc ruling.


5 posted on 03/06/2020 12:00:34 PM PST by gibsonguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

all designed to create more chaos and sob stories at the border during the summer surge to make Trump look bad, along with smuggling in more illegal votes.


6 posted on 03/06/2020 12:03:56 PM PST by sheehan (DEPORT ALL ILLEGALS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Okay, I’ll bite. Exactly WHAT is illegal about keeping aliens on the Mexican side of the border?

Smells like social justice bullsh!t.


7 posted on 03/06/2020 12:04:01 PM PST by Jacquerie (ArticleVBlog.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

Hope you’re wrong, but can’t say that you will be


8 posted on 03/06/2020 12:13:25 PM PST by DoughtyOne (The DNC has a taxidermist on speed for Nancy, Hillary, and Ruth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: gibsonguy

They MAY do a stay on the injunction and send it back for an en banc ruling.
*****************************************
I haven’t followed this case too closely but I think this appeal to the Supreme Court is just on the issue of the injunction.


9 posted on 03/06/2020 12:22:45 PM PST by House Atreides (Boycott the NFL 100% — PERMANENTLY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: House Atreides

I predict that the Supreme Court stays this order pending the resolution of all appeals

Hans von Spakovsky wrote an excellent, succinct explanation of the many very substantial issues with the 9th Circus’s ruling:

https://www.heritage.org/immigration/commentary/remain-mexico-policy-needed-reduce-illegal-immigration


10 posted on 03/06/2020 1:12:12 PM PST by TheConservator (All the blather about TrumpÂ’s violation of the law is simply a projection of their own lawlessness.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

If they knock it down, the flood starts again.


11 posted on 03/06/2020 1:15:46 PM PST by Lurkinanloomin (Natural Born Citizens Are Born Here of Citizen Parents_Know Islam, No Peace-No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Trump had made great strides in putting conservatives in the 9th Circuit. Unfortunately there are still too many liberals still there and with the bad luck of drawing 2 liberals judges on a judge panel, you get garbage political decisions like this one. Supreme Court if they take the case which they probably will, will reverse it


12 posted on 03/06/2020 2:32:23 PM PST by chuckee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Indefinite quarantine.


13 posted on 03/06/2020 2:46:31 PM PST by clearcarbon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson