Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Clinical course and outcomes of critically ill patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a single-centered, retrospective, observational study
The Lancet ^ | 24 Feb 2020 | Xiaobo Yang, et al

Posted on 02/24/2020 9:47:42 PM PST by datura

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 last
To: PGR88

Steroid use with ARDS is usually routine, but from what I’ve read it’s usually counter-productive with this virus so it’s kind of fallen into a last resort category.


61 posted on 02/25/2020 3:17:54 AM PST by whershey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: datura

Not censored?

How do we know that?


62 posted on 02/25/2020 3:40:13 AM PST by mewzilla (Break out the mustard seeds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

(71%) patients required mechanical ventilation.


We’re going to need a bigger ventilator factory, right?


63 posted on 02/25/2020 3:43:18 AM PST by VTenigma (The Democrat party is the party of the mathematically challenged)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: datura
To anybody: Google (just searched for about 3 minutes) doesn't quickly pull up a death rate for flu, but it looks like about 80,000 in 4 million yearly around the 2017, 2018 time frame (I think that's U.S. ), or about 2%, or about the same as Corona seems to be.

Is that about the right number/percentage - those who know?

Thanks!

64 posted on 02/25/2020 4:53:51 AM PST by tinyowl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Glad I left my canned goods and bottled water in the basement last time Glenn Beck told me society was about to collapse because of the birdflu...
...or was that SARS?....oh wait maybe it was because of the great economic collapse of January 2018.

...oh well, either way.


65 posted on 02/25/2020 5:08:33 AM PST by BuckeyeGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Wayne07

I see NO South American countries listed... Gee, I wonder why..... :(


66 posted on 02/25/2020 5:26:35 AM PST by unread (A REPUBLIC..! if you can keep it....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: datura

“South Korea 893 infected, 9 deaths, 6 critical, 22 recovered

Do you see odds like that for flu? No.

That’s almost 10% mortality in a first world nation. Or one squad in a battalion on a five day exercise”

Math major? It’s 1%


67 posted on 02/25/2020 6:13:01 AM PST by DAC21 ( and Naflet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: PGR88

“32 (61·5%) patients had died at 28 days”

Thirty two, not twenty, died.

That is 4.5% = 32 / 710.


68 posted on 02/25/2020 7:07:12 AM PST by Uncle Miltie (OKSnowflake!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: datura
28 day mortality for ICU patients.

That's after ICU admission. How long were they coughing before they went to the hospital? How long were they in a regular room before moving to ICU?

That gives us what, average five (or six) weeks from infection to death? And they've got everybody on a 14-day quarantine? No wonder the cruise ship kept having more cases pop up every couple days. It probably wasn't much continuous infection with everyone stuck in their room, almost everyone was already infected when quarantine began, from all the partying prior.
69 posted on 02/25/2020 8:21:01 PM PST by Svartalfiar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: PGR88
In sum, 20 of the original 710 ultimately died. 2.8% mortality. indeed is higher than “the common cold.”

As of right now, the Johns Hopkins tracker shows 45 non-China deaths (I am including HongKong/Singapore here), and 254 recoveries. That gives us a current non-Chinese fatality rate of 45 / (45 + 254) = 15%.

Which, is another indicator that the Chinese numbers are bullshit, because with their pollution issues, smoking rates, and crappy/overloaded medical facilities, there's absolutely no way China has a lower rate than the rest of the world. (China's is officially 9.1%.)
70 posted on 02/25/2020 8:32:55 PM PST by Svartalfiar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: dp0622
Because the death rate outside of China is incredibly low. It’s a flu.

Um, look at my post above, but the current numbers from Johns Hopkins put the non-China mortality rate at 15%.
71 posted on 02/25/2020 8:34:58 PM PST by Svartalfiar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: datura

Thanks for this....


72 posted on 02/25/2020 8:36:21 PM PST by DouglasKC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mariner
This virus is apparently very dangerous with an R naught of around 2.5. And it kills something above 1% of those who get it.

Where are you pulling numbers from? The current mortality rate is 9.1%, if you trust the Chinese numbers. Probably much higher.
73 posted on 02/25/2020 8:38:09 PM PST by Svartalfiar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson