Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Roberts visibly reacts to Warren's impeachment question about his 'legitimacy' without trial witnesses
Fox News ^ | January 30 2020 | Charles Creitz

Posted on 01/30/2020 11:15:16 PM PST by knighthawk

Chief Justice John Roberts seemed visibly irritated when Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., formally asked a question during President Trump's impeachment trial Thursday that referenced him and questioned the legitimacy of the Supreme Court and Constitution in relation to the proceedings.

In accordance with Senate rules, the chief justice of the United States must read aloud the questions posed by senators to the impeachment managers and the president's counsel. Roberts formally recognized Warren, a Democratic presidential candidate, who then submitted her written question to a clerk.

Roberts read her question from the card -- which referenced him.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Massachusetts
KEYWORDS: alexandervindman; burisma; declassification; elizabethwarren; ericciaramella; fauxahontas; fbi; fisa; impeachment; johnroberts; massachusetts; roberts; slingingbull; ukraine; warren
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

1 posted on 01/30/2020 11:15:16 PM PST by knighthawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: knighthawk

“Visibly irritated” by stupidity.
LOL!


2 posted on 01/30/2020 11:18:16 PM PST by mrsmith (Dumb sluts (M / F) : Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat/RINO Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk

Roberts was/is DeepState from the start.


3 posted on 01/30/2020 11:29:38 PM PST by A strike ( Ecclesiastes 10:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk

I question John Roberts’ legitimacy as a judicial Conservative.


4 posted on 01/30/2020 11:33:29 PM PST by zeestephen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mrsmith

As a presidential candidate, (kind of) what is she doing there again?


5 posted on 01/31/2020 12:04:43 AM PST by Luke21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mrsmith

Is there anything better than a whiney rat?


6 posted on 01/31/2020 12:37:55 AM PST by genghis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: zeestephen

I don’t. I question him period. He is bought and paid for by someone, probably someone attached to obammy. Roberts is a hack.


7 posted on 01/31/2020 12:38:01 AM PST by Sequoyah101 (We are governed by the consent of the governed and we are fools for allowing it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Sequoyah101
He is bought and paid for by someone, probably someone attached to obammy.

I believe the 'RATS have the goods on him & his wife as regards the shady adoptions of their two Irish children that were consummated in South America in order to circumvent Ireland's strict laws.

8 posted on 01/31/2020 12:50:57 AM PST by twister881 (Jeffrey Epstein did not kill himself)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Sequoyah101
Re: "probably someone attached to obammy"

I will guess someone a lot closer to home...

George W. Bush - who tried to shove Amnesty and Supreme Court nominee Harriet Miers down Conservative throats.

9 posted on 01/31/2020 1:07:19 AM PST by zeestephen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk

Nothing like calling out a RINO Judge to sway him the radical moonbat point of view./sarc

Princess Gray Beaver Warren was absent from law-school when they covered ‘Apple Polishing’.


10 posted on 01/31/2020 1:17:11 AM PST by Beagle8U (Did Eric Ciaramella kill Epstein? He didn't kill himself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: twister881

That speculation is getting tiresome. It has nothing to do with fuzzy adoptions and everything to do with his membership in the cult.


11 posted on 01/31/2020 1:29:23 AM PST by HalfIrish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Luke21
As a presidential candidate, (kind of) what is she doing there again?

well, its an interesting situation where, if she were out campaigning, she would be derelict in her duty as a congresscritter, which would reflect on her badly
12 posted on 01/31/2020 1:37:55 AM PST by wafflehouse (RE-ELECT NO ONE !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: wafflehouse

Oh, she should get a vote, just not a voice. Conflict of interest.


13 posted on 01/31/2020 1:52:48 AM PST by Hugh the Scot ("Jesus was a fundamentalist".- BipolarBob)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk

I think she was trying to embarrass Roberts into voting for witnesses in case of a 50/50 tie vote. It’s not clear if he is the tie breaker or the vice president is. Of course I’d rather have Pence decide than this traitor.


14 posted on 01/31/2020 1:57:55 AM PST by Nateman (If the left is not screaming, you are doing it wrong ...and Epstein did not kill himself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: twister881

That has to be getting moldy by now. Aren’t the kids in college now?


15 posted on 01/31/2020 2:28:08 AM PST by napscoordinator (Trump/Hunter, jr for President/Vice President 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk

Yet he didn’t read Rand Paul’s question.


16 posted on 01/31/2020 2:28:44 AM PST by wastedyears (The left would kill every single one of us and our families if they knew they could get away with it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zeestephen

I question him as a Chief Justice at all now.


17 posted on 01/31/2020 2:32:02 AM PST by combat_boots (God bless Israel and all who protect and defend her. Merry Christmas! In God We Trust!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Luke21

Campaigning & pandering


18 posted on 01/31/2020 3:18:36 AM PST by NativeSon ( What Would Virginia Do? #WWVD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk

SENATORS: If the Impeachment doesn’t fit....you must ACQUIT!


19 posted on 01/31/2020 4:10:24 AM PST by 2harddrive (Go to www.CodeIsFreeSpeech.com for 10 FREE 3D-printer gun blueprints!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wastedyears

I was wondering when someone was going to point that out.

If the rules actually state he has to read Senate questions, then he violated Senate rules. Problem then becomes, what to do about it.

I believe Roberts is either severely compromised, or he is an unprincipled and leftist charlatan.

We don’t know, but if what Rand Paul said afterward about his question is true, it is also possible Roberts was afraid the question would have placed pressure to have witnesses.


20 posted on 01/31/2020 4:37:53 AM PST by patriotfury ((May the fleas of a thousand camels occupy mo' ham mads tents!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson